๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ

17.8K posts

๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ banner
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ

๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ

@seldon_seen

๐–’๐–†๐–“๐–‰๐–†๐–™๐–š๐–’ ๐–†๐–‰ ๐–†๐–˜๐–™๐–—๐–†

๐“ฟ ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Mayฤฑs 2021
2.5K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰1.2K ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seenยท
cash lottery to a social leaderboard defaults to purposeless offramp. tickets can accrue by evolving social criteria, redraws can be secondarily priced, and some productive assets can be stewarded from a distance.
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seen

a permissionless goods lottery needs escrow, where the winning ticket can call a redraw after grace period. the reputation can be derived, rather than incentivizing frivolous complaints. lots of options, like transferrability or delegation to chain of custody.

English
1
0
1
97
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seenยท
@deepfates super as in "supergroup"? most of modernity is superintelligent if this is super as in supernatural, that's in the eye of the beholder.
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ tweet media
English
0
0
0
37
๐ŸŽญ
๐ŸŽญ@deepfatesยท
is there any system on Earth currently that is "superintelligent"?
English
21
0
24
2.9K
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
sacha
sacha@sachaยท
when you normalize giving discretionary emergency powers to a committee, you effectively import the worst parts of the existing "democratic" system in other words you import democracy with discretion over specific groups/actors. this combination is effectively what the administrative-state critique, from hayek through the public-choice literature through the post-2008 financial-regulation debates, has targeted you can try to justify via the ends all you want but procedurally it runs counter to the raison d'etre of crypto if you're going to have rules to deal with these things that are credibly neutral then they cannot be discretionary, which means they need to be formally articulated in advance and be generally applicable
English
2
6
20
1.6K
Zy
Zy@ZyMazzaยท
I feel like it kind of gets glossed over that semantic information can be expressed as vectors. Thatโ€™s surprising, right?
English
105
15
854
50K
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seenยท
@gfodor no, the labor market won't collapse except for some premium, and that income will need to be supplemented by a competition of dividends. there's always more solar power and signal to process at a distance.
English
0
0
0
6
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodorยท
It would be much easier if you're going to take a position against UBI you say if you agree or disagree with the premise that AI is going to collapse the market price of human labor, and propose an alternative solution. 99% of commentators are failing this simple test.
English
88
13
186
7.5K
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
๐’ช
๐’ช@SHL0MSยท
Aaron Swartz on doomers
๐’ช tweet media
English
10
17
127
14.3K
Neeraj K. Agrawal
Neeraj K. Agrawal@NeerajKAยท
Letโ€™s say someone likes your ape enough that they want to wear it on a shirt. They would pay you royalties for that.
English
88
233
6.5K
373.1K
Aaron Slodov
Aaron Slodov@aphysicistยท
ok i solved UHI/UBI, pack it up. since agency matters more than intelligence, govt gives every person compute and a robot and can build from there. the market is now billions of personal economies. gamers rise up.
English
29
7
85
5.3K
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seenยท
airdrops don't need to be extractive, the project can release a permit/NFT/GPU periodically, and the proceeds from the market discovery remains accountable to public results (without revealing everything else). warrant problem isn't as severe if tickets are soulbound.
English
0
0
0
31
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seenยท
a permissionless goods lottery needs escrow, where the winning ticket can call a redraw after grace period. the reputation can be derived, rather than incentivizing frivolous complaints. lots of options, like transferrability or delegation to chain of custody.
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ tweet media
English
1
0
1
146
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodorยท
Imagine the prices of all goods and services were slashed by 1000x, but if you tried to find a job, raise money for a startup, or sell anything yourself youโ€™d find no counterparty whatsoever. Now imagine thatโ€™s true for most people. Whatโ€™s the logical solution to this?
English
130
5
369
32.6K
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ
๐ŸŒŒ อœส–๐ŸŒŒ@seldon_seenยท
the irony of AI policy is that the ideal can be really boring what you mean, we need to drop the cost of land freight to zero?
English
0
0
0
12