Neeraj K. Agrawal

77.3K posts

Neeraj K. Agrawal banner
Neeraj K. Agrawal

Neeraj K. Agrawal

@NeerajKA

comms @coincenter—the cryptocurrency policy think tank | [email protected] | food account/retirement pasture: @neerajkafood

Washington, DC Katılım Mayıs 2008
4K Takip Edilen158.6K Takipçiler
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Bitcoin Policy Institute
Bitcoin Policy Institute@bitcoinpolicy·
Special thanks and recognition go to @coincenter, @valkenburgh, and @SenLummis for their leadership on this issue and their years-long effort to ensure protections for developers. BRCA is an indisputable win for innovation and the right to code
English
0
7
40
5.7K
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Coin Center
Coin Center@coincenter·
Coin Center is encouraged by the advancement of the Clarity Act through the Senate Banking Committee with the BRCA included. As it heads to the floor, there may be a push to make concessions; the BRCA cannot be one of them. coincenter.org/the-brca-survi…
English
0
3
8
1.8K
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Nick Anthony
Nick Anthony@EconWithNick·
It's shockingly disappointing that no journalists have questioned ECB President Lagarde on her idea to use the digital euro for sanctions evasion. cato.org/blog/digital-e…
English
3
6
35
2.4K
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
Another Seldon crisis averted in crypto. Warren’s crypto army defeated for now. The Tradfi equity wrapper wars come next. The final boss is IRS. Then a thousand years of peace.
GIF
English
2
0
15
810
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Peter Van Valkenburgh
Peter Van Valkenburgh@valkenburgh·
HUGE. Looks like we got a non-partisan vote out of Senate Banking with the BRCA still intact. I'm thrilled. The last minute compromise reflects Coin Center's analysis from last January, there were some steps forward since then and then back but we are feeling very comfortable.
English
14
48
351
64K
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Joe
Joe@0x_Osprey·
After 10+ years of fighting for developer protections, today is the single most important day to amplify @valkenburgh and @coincenter
English
0
4
19
1.7K
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Peter Van Valkenburgh
Peter Van Valkenburgh@valkenburgh·
I'm still piecing final compromise together. I think certain cross references to the BRCA in Title 3 have been struck. I liked those refs but believed they were aggressive and jeopardized bipartisan support for BRCA. Coin Center was ready to support without them last January.
English
1
4
38
3.3K
Eleanor Terrett
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett·
🚨NEW: Negotiations between a small group of bipartisan senators aimed at getting Democrats to a better place on at least two outstanding Clarity Act issues wrapped for the night without a deal, I’m told. In a statement, one of the lead GOP negotiators, @SenLummis, said: “Ultimately, we have agreement on 99% of the bill. I hope my colleagues across the aisle will work with me to get the remaining 1% resolved after we pass this bill out of committee. Otherwise, when or if another FTX happens, we will have no one to blame but ourselves.” Democrats like @SenAdamSchiff and @SenRubenGallego had been pushing to reach a compromise on ethics/conflicts of interest involving the First Family ahead of tomorrow’s markup as a condition of their support for the bill, while other Democrats voiced eleventh-hour concerns about provisions tied to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), which would prevent non-custodial software developers from being prosecuted under money transmitter laws. It’s my understanding that meaningful progress was made on ethics, but last minute disagreements over BRCA changes ultimately prevented a deal from coming together. Of course, it’s still unclear how the five pro-crypto Democrats on the Banking Committee will ultimately vote tomorrow, but as of now, the expectation is that the markup will be partisan.
English
107
273
1.8K
292.7K
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Alex Miller
Alex Miller@alexlmiller·
I don't care about stablecoin interest: protecting open source developers from prosecution because of what others do is the most important part of the Clarity act.
Peter Van Valkenburgh@valkenburgh

Let me make one more thing crystal clear. We do not support Clarity with the stripped version of BRCA proposed by Sen. Cortez Masto. For other members of the committee, this is a with us or against us moment. Stand up for developer rights or vote no.

English
4
11
65
5K
Neeraj K. Agrawal retweetledi
Peter Van Valkenburgh
Peter Van Valkenburgh@valkenburgh·
Let me make one more thing crystal clear. We do not support Clarity with the stripped version of BRCA proposed by Sen. Cortez Masto. For other members of the committee, this is a with us or against us moment. Stand up for developer rights or vote no.
Coin Center@coincenter

Our letter in support of passing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act and with it the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, which we have championed since 2018.

English
2
50
233
24.6K