고정된 트윗
Thinky Crow
48.5K posts

Thinky Crow
@ThinkyCrow
I want a world where married LBGT couples are free to protect their cannabis & poppy gardens with assault rifles they purchased online with cryptocurrency.
SF Bay Area 가입일 Mart 2009
1.2K 팔로잉1.8K 팔로워
Thinky Crow 리트윗함

@BlackDumpling All red, nobody dead.
The only people who die in ANY outcome are blue. Blue creates the problem, just to give you a CHANCE to fix it.
Red means there’s no problem to begin with.

English

@Ephraim_12K @BlackDumpling Except before the buttons got pushed, there was nobody to “save”.
The only people who die in ANY outcome are those push blue. Hence there is ZERO reason to push it.
English
Thinky Crow 리트윗함

@_wej01 I would miss coffee, but not that much.
Also you didn’t say no caffeine. Caffeine pills are cheaper than coffee or energy drinks anyway.
English

Yes… it is. If I vote red, the other guy doesn’t matter. The tally will either be 98 or 99 blue. Either way all blues die.
Yes obviously knowing others’ votes can change the choice. The point is in the original question, when nobody has chosen yet, there’s no logical reason for anyone to vote blue. There is no one to “save”.
English

@ThinkyCrow There is not a 100% certainty that blue loses if you don't vote for it. I said IF you and the other guy. You have to rely on the other guy too, that's the risk.
You would press blue if it has a 0% chance of failing? But not a 55ish% chance of winning like most polls show?
English

@DafityDaf This itself is false equivalency, because it makes blue default. Blue is an action, and it is the ONLY action that puts your life in danger. The only reason anyone is in danger in this scenario is because they pushed blue.
English

@4thOfJuly365 Is it though? Once it hits two likes, there’s no reason for anyone else to like.
English

@ThinkyCrow I don’t understand how much of a difference that would make. Possibly planning time? If the people are aware anyway, not that something like that matters in this poll as you’re the first guy voting.
Might just be a me problem, if possible would you mind explaining?
English

@DafityDaf In that case I would vote blue, as there 100% certainty blue loses if I don’t.
English

@ThinkyCrow Ok dude, in my scenario if you vote blue then the guy after you votes blue it would be 100 red and 100 blue and nothing would happen. That's the point
English

@Truth_in_Number @yoursimmo11 I’m not offended, that’s kinda funny.
English

@ThinkyCrow @yoursimmo11 Not that I'm trying to be insulting, I actually loved your reply, but the first reaction I had to seeing it was to want to reply to you saying, "Yeah, well, your mama is a chemical."
Probably should have just kept that to myself.
English

@DustyDevil19 The original basically assumes everyone chooses at the same time.
English

@DafityDaf You realize you need MORE than 50% to push blue for everyone to live, right? The blue folks are all doomed no matter what in your scenario.
English

@ThinkyCrow Let's say there's 200 people in the button scenario, 100 people have chosen red and 98 chose blue. You are the penultimate vote and you don't know it or what others voted for. Blue is in danger but they're in danger because you MIGHT pick red.
English

@AshValePress @Gingerblast I hate when folks use DnD, but I gotta say DaD is much worse.
English

@DafityDaf Blue is choosing to put your life in danger, requiring you to be saved. Red does not put you in danger and does not require anyone to save you.
English

@ThinkyCrow But that makes no sense because red is not the default position as this whole debate this past week should prove.
English

@DafityDaf But that makes no sense. Before you push the button, there is no one to save.
English

@ThinkyCrow The one time I don't say "potentially guarantees." But the key word is COULD because red COULD also "win" and kill people.
You keep asking why and I keep telling you. because some people value the collective outcome over a guaranteed personal advantage.
English

@John_Cyrano @truthiness4ever We don’t individually have the power to save them. We only have the power to toss in more bodies until we hit 50% +1.
How many folks in China or India do you think would pick blue?
English

Who knows? Perhaps they're stupid? Perhaps they are too young to understand the ramifications of their choice. Perhaps they are trying to maximize the chances of their loved ones surviving even at the risk of their own life.
It doesn't matter why. It only matters that there are people at risk, right now, and you have the power to help save them.
English

Blue always works. Red only works if over half the people vote blue.
(The purpose of red is to kill people who vote blue)
Double A@WeebGodBtw
Blue only works if everyone does blue Red works regardless Majority of the worlds population wouldn’t have the moral clarity to vote blue, and if you can’t guarantee everyone will choose blue you should choose red
English

@sfali789 @cartierfamilyZ @grok So you have two different standards of hygiene for your hands and your butthole.
English

@ThinkyCrow @cartierfamilyZ Who said we don't use soap?! LOL oh dear. Anyway @Grok explain to Thinky here the findings of this 2016 analytical review in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum demonstrating water's clear advantage in actual cleansing over dry tissue.
English

@ThinkyCrow @truthiness4ever Actually the aliens that put humanity in this test created this problem and you're blaming the fellow victims rather than helping them.
English














