…

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa The ones who rebelled against him believed he was a kaffir, the ones who didn’t rebel and stayed patient and advised in private didn’t takfir him. We don’t see the ones who rebelled call the other side palace scholars or insult them. You need to learn the WHY.

@tryehaa @Alghurabaaaaaa The system was an islamic Caliphate and he was an unjust ruler and will be hold accountable for it but don't compare those times with modern day secular rulers who are product of colonization and agents of the west.

Four living men — take your fatwas from them and leave the scholars of misguidance: • Saleh Al-Fawzan • Abdul Razzaq Al-Badr • Saleh Al-Sindi • Abdul Salam Al-Shuwa'ir"

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa Was that action Islamic? Every action is a hukm. Was he ruling by Allah’s law when he was doing that?

@tryehaa @Alghurabaaaaaa No but the system was islamic not secular system as today.

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa I don’t disagree, many rulers are bare minimum faasiqeen. We do not make tabdi’ or slander the scholars unless there is clear cut proof that they misguide the rulers. If they remain patient and advise privately because they see the maslaha in that over advocating for rebellion

@tryehaa @Alghurabaaaaaa part 2: as kuffar, zalim or fasiq. I don't make takfeer on people as it requires certainty and I don't have to make takfeer to make my point so hence why I call them muslims. But they are fasiq and their scholars they bought are fasiq like them.

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa Was Al Hajjaj righteous? Killed companions, slaughtered Abdullah Ibn Zubayr grandson of Abu Bakr infront of his mother? Killed people who recited a certain Quranic style that he didn’t like? Killed 100k+ righteous people many of them being sahabis and tabi’s.

@tryehaa @Alghurabaaaaaa part 1: No in salafs time in the Caliphate they ruled with islam and they were legitimate rulers. They were not slaves of US and they did not sell give kuffar bases to kill other Muslims and steal Muslims home. As for ruler being muslim then its because all described ...

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa You are far from consistent. By Allah if we were to be consistent with your standards you’d crumble and have to insult many of the people from the salaf. You believing the ruler is Muslim, but still saying all of this shows your jahl

@tryehaa @Alghurabaaaaaa My scholars? I am consistent. Any Muslim scholars today who is on the payroll of the ruler who does not rule by islam is equivalent to Al-Fawzan. Its doesn't matter if he is ashari, salafi or shia. And I never made takfeer on the scholars not even the ruler.

@takfirism @CigariIIo27 You just sound pathetic, honest truth. Forget about Jolani, his wife isn’t a mutabarija by any means. I don’t know of any madhab mu’tamad that would say this as well

@tryehaa @CigariIIo27 By Allah my transgressions are nothing compared to the taghut dayooth jolani

Imagine this being the state of your caliph’s wife. This is what shariah looks like now apparently.

@takfirism @CigariIIo27 May Allah whomever does that, but your point is what? You’re speaking just to speak

@CigariIIo27 How does it feel to have your amir ul mumineen’s wife’s deep fake/ai corn spreading across rafidhi xitter. Do you feel cucked enough?

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa This can be said towards anyone, your tiny little brain can’t comprehend basic principles. We could say the same for your scholars who are close to their leaders. We can go as far as making takfir on Adnani for saying you get closer to Allah by washing feet of baghdadi.

@tryehaa @Alghurabaaaaaa My Arabic skills and your arrogant response does not address the fact that an alim on a rulers payroll is a huge issue if that ruler is an American ally and does not rule by islam and recently introducing modernity and liberal ideas.

@SamNEW2026 @Alghurabaaaaaa You yourself don’t know proper Arabic this is above your pay grade go learn the Arabic alphabetic and come back

@Alghurabaaaaaa Al-Fawzan is on payroll of the Saudi ruler and he does not call him out so no I would never take a fatwa from him. In arabic we regard him as علماء السلاطين ...

@shahmir69420 @DoeMax2025 @AlDonFodio You don’t understand a lick of the Shaykh’s book.Go study Islam properly before trying to apply it. The salaf themselves had disputes on who was and wasn’t a kaffir. You don’t see them saying whoever doesn’t takfir a kaffir is a kaffir to each other. There is tafsil to the qawl

@tryehaa @DoeMax2025 @AlDonFodio This is from Nawaqid Al-Islām lol.

The kufr of not making takfīr of a Tāghūt Gov Ibn al-Tubbān Al-Maghribi [d. 371AH] By Allah, I do not fear for them because of sins, for their Rabb is karīm. Rather, I fear that they may doubt the kufr of Banī ʿUbayd [the Fatimid state], and thus enter the Fire.

@shahmir69420 @DoeMax2025 @AlDonFodio Jahil

@DoeMax2025 @AlDonFodio If you don’t takfir a kāfir, you become a kāfir.

@KeroVibe_o @MihirRMA @nihari_muncher If you knew a lick of Islam, you’d know if someone’s wife is killed he has the right given from Allah to protect his honor and kill the guy who did so. No man lets his wife get killed and he does nothing about it. You are better off dying while protecting her honor. You filth

@MihirRMA @nihari_muncher You put those sentences together not shias, I explained why Ali didn't create war in early ummah yet you continue to keep repeating it. Truly you are the worst of hypocrites and cowards.

yet named his son and grandson after him ? 🤣

@KajangSym @SchnitzelKroos He quotes mujahid 😂 Mujahid is from the backbones of the people of the salaf

@SchnitzelKroos Fawzan & his Zionists-friendly khawarij sects also promoting kufr Aqidah - the real obvious BID'AH deviant Tawheed never conceived by early Salaf generations

Grand Mufti of Saudi Saleh Fawzan: "Jihad in Palestine or elsewhere my brother, it is not in their hands to declare jihad. Jihad has conditions, and it is only with the permission of the ruler." So defensive Jihad needs permission now from who? Israel🤣 May Allah deal with him

@Deso_Dogg1 @ymm1447 @HanbaliRegiment Average daeshi

@ymm1447 @HanbaliRegiment On the day of judgement they will truly be regretful

This heretic khariji dog of hellfire was better than Khamenei and this should not even be a hot take, it should be common sense.

Notez qu'il comptait violer la sœur devant son enfant, il est resté un moment dans la pièce avant d'en ressortir ayant constaté par lui-même qu'elle était indisposée, c'est ce qu'a rapporté le journaliste. Qu'Allah le jette dans le bas-fond de l'enfer, lui et ses frères.

@AlDonFodio I’m curious. When a judge/ruler out of desire rules by other than the sharia. What is this law he’s ruling by out of desire or bribery?

@shezislam @AlDonFodio I can bring you cases where he takfirs the amal without dwelling into the i’tiqad. No one says Albani was free of irja. May Allah forgive him from the irja he was upon. He was a great Imam but these people who spread these posts takfir him. Fear Allah

From the apparent meaning of Albānī’s statement, where he says kufr amali is all kufr asghar unless accompanied with kufr i’tiqadi — this is ʾirjāʾ without a doubt. Istibdāl is not what I’m referring to, you originally brought a statement from S͟hayk͟h Ṣāliḥ on Istiḥlāl Amali and compared it to Kufr Amali to defend Albānī here, when Ṣāliḥ wouldn’t even agree with Albānī on this issue.

Close student of Albani says to him: O Sheikh there is ijma’ from Ibn Kathir & 6 other scholars on the kufr of one who replaces Shari’ah, likewise MiAW includes it in meaning of Taghut Albani: Kufr ‘amali is all kufr asghar unless its accompanied by kufr i’tiqadi [irja’ of jahm]

@shezislam @AlDonFodio We can agree that there are scholars, whether they dwelled deep into these topics or not that do believe tashri’ is kufr regardless of i’tiqad. There is no problem with this. Whether we deem this as ikhtilaf or a mistake of ijtihad is another issue.

Sorry I misread your final comment. The "showing your true beliefs" in question is just me bringing statements from scholars who differed on this issue. The "larping" in question is just me taking from a lot of the same scholars you do, but you cannot accept even the possibility of ikhtilaf on these issues.

@shezislam @AlDonFodio No problem with Albani’s view in this as many scholars held the same view, and not once has Sh Saleh come out or clarified in his books those views are “irja of jahm” Ibn Baz, one of the most knowledgeable scholars Allah has blessed us in our time has the same views as Albani.

Sure let’s say S͟hayk͟h Ṣāliḥ believes it to be Kufr when it’s dominates over the Sharīʿah, the thing is, Imām Albānī doesn’t. So why are you bringing up S͟hayk͟h Ṣāliḥ to defend the view of Albānī, when he doesn’t agree with Albānī in both : • Istibdāl • Kufr Amali That’s what I’m critiquing and it’s what I’m pointing out. And as for my beliefs, they are known and have been clarified publicly by me many times (إن شاء الله) - don’t conflate your ignorance with “my cowardice”.

@shezislam @AlDonFodio Sh Saleh believes it’s kufr if it becomes the dominant and frequently law over the sharia. Don’t play with the sheikhs words fear Allah. Especially you, don’t forget you were larping for a while until recently you got the courage to show your true beliefs.

@tryehaa @AlDonFodio The account who's posting it, is bringing a quote concerning Istibdal, and Shaykh Salih Al ash-Shaykh agrees this is Kufr to begin with anyways.