Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐

2.9K posts

Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐ banner
Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐

Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐

@umm_yeah_so

Local Alpha can't be quiet anymore 🥀 pro women | pro cats

가입일 Şubat 2024
106 팔로잉118 팔로워
IGN
IGN@IGN_UNBIASED·
@umm_yeah_so Ghunghat wasn't forced per se before. Your wish and accordingly how well u can deal with the weather. Guys in Rajasthan also cover their head and hair due to hot climate. But it became enforced due to islamic Turkic invasions
English
0
0
0
3
Darshan Sharma
Darshan Sharma@dmsh_tuber·
@umm_yeah_so Mai rehta toh ek jor ka slap baja deta woh gynac ko. How did you control your anger that time?
English
1
0
0
12
Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐ 리트윗함
Oscura
Oscura@Akisuki·
Las Mujeres feministas, lesbianas, radicales del mundo, me dan ganas de vivir.
Español
25
969
6.3K
50.6K
Mirage Chaser
Mirage Chaser@miragechazer101·
@umm_yeah_so The modesty surely got inspired from Islamic rule. Just like in British rule. And most of communities didn't keep ghunghat that also show it wasn't popular. This is the tribal attire of biggest ST community of Rajasthan. Where do u see patriarchy here? U r pseudo feminist
Mirage Chaser tweet media
English
2
0
0
41
Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐
@miragechazer101 All I said is it did not come from Islamic invasion which is correct. Also if it was about protection from Sun, men too would do it, but they dont, so u can take ur pseudo justifications somewhere else
English
2
0
0
49
Mirage Chaser
Mirage Chaser@miragechazer101·
@umm_yeah_so Lmao, it was popular in hot, dry areas like Rajasthan, where they have to cover themselves, sometimes even face. Majority of India, had atariya and uttariya. That's the traditional attire in humid regions where people sweat alot. Do better. None of this has to do with religion
English
2
0
0
58
Kirti ִֶָ𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ🐇་༘࿐ 리트윗함
Dr. Sanjukta Basu, M.A., LLB., PhD
My views on the #sabarimala case: From a feminist perspective, it is a completely useless fight. Women need to reject notions of temple, pilgrimage and religion rather than fight for the right to be stupid and regressive. From equality perspective, I wonder, why the petitioner did not initiate the PIL for all women's right to enter all religious structures? Why did they only pick Sabarimala and Hindu women? If the petitioners cannot give a logical answer, then this petition was politically motivated from the get go. I also wonder about the timing of the constitution of 9-Judge bench, since the matter is politically sensitive with elections due in Kerala.
English
19
26
139
11.3K