Wayne Clark

3K posts

Wayne Clark

Wayne Clark

@waredbird

Retired military meteorologist, baseball addict, fisherman & surfer.

Missouri, USA 가입일 Aralık 2009
181 팔로잉185 팔로워
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@PNWConservative Still waiting for that death certificate that lists death by “greenhouse gases”. Maybe Kerry will be the first.
English
0
0
0
9
PNW Conservative
PNW Conservative@PNWConservative·
The grim reaper himself…. “The Climate Crisis is killing people - every year now, millions of people across the Planet are dying because of Greenhouse Gas Pollution”
English
166
21
201
6K
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@TJMoe28 Laura seems to be always whining her heart out. I’d rather sit by a crying kid than a whiny adult.
English
0
0
1
72
Real America's Voice (RAV)
Real America's Voice (RAV)@RealAmVoice·
MCLAUGHLIN SOUNDS ALARM ON SAVE ACT @TriciaOhio says failure to pass the SAVE America Act puts “our national security and, of course, our election integrity at risk” as questions grow over election system vulnerabilities. @JackPosobiec
English
14
81
233
16.3K
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@OwenGregorian @ScottAdamsSays The best sea level rise indicator is when big finance stops giving mortgages to buyers of ocean front property and most of inland Florida.
English
0
0
4
48
Owen Gregorian
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian·
Remember what @scottadamssays: Wait until you find out about climate models.
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian

New Study Finds 90% Of Sea Level Research Relies On Models, Not Real Measurements | Thomas Richard, Climate Change Dispatch This just in: a CNN headline reads, “Scientists find sea levels are already much higher than we thought. That could spell trouble for the future”. How the Dickens, you might reasonably cry, could they be higher than we thought? [some emphasis, links added] As in “more than 3 feet in some regions”? How could you be wrong about whether the water was up to your ankles or your chest? The New York Times likewise insists that “Sea Levels Are Already Higher Than Many Scientists Think, New Study Shows—Researchers found that a majority of studies on coastal sea levels underestimated how high water levels are, and hundreds of millions of people are closer to peril than previously thought.” So why didn’t they notice? And the answer turns out to be worse than the question. See, the vast majority of studies of sea levels were based not on measurements but on wildly inaccurate models. Leading to the conclusion, CNN would have us believe, that the science is settled, and worse than we thought, “raising alarms that the world is underestimating the extent of the threat and how quickly coastlines could disappear,” but this time they’ve got it right, for sure. If you had just discovered that something you had firmly believed to be fact was pretty much just made up, surely the appropriate response would be a pause for reflection on all manner of topics, including, painfully, your own gullibility and dogmatism. But no. Rather, the piece immediately shrills: “Sea level rise is one of the most visible and alarming impacts of the human-driven climate crisis, threatening hundreds of millions of people who live along global coastlines. Scientists estimate we’re already locked into around 6 inches of global sea level rise by 2050.” Now this passage is tosh. First, because the scientists who estimate say no such thing. NOAA, for instance, makes the possibly overheated claim that: “The rate of global sea level rise is accelerating: it has more than doubled from 0.06 inches (1.4 millimeters) per year throughout most of the twentieth century to 0.14 inches (3.6 millimeters) per year from 2006-2015.” But even so, 0.14 inches per year is only 1.4 inches per decade. And since we have less than 2.5 decades between now and 2050, we get less than … uh, can anyone in the newsroom do math even with a computer? Yup, it’d be 1.4 times 2.5, which is… hang on… 3.5 inches. Not six. Dang. Oh well. Math is hard. But what makes that statement really insolent rubbish is that it’s exactly what journalists have been saying scientists were saying for decades now. And what’s the point of a dramatic new finding if it changes nothing, not even the verbiage? OK, what also makes it insolent rubbish is the insinuation that anyone might plausibly be off by three feet about the water level in their local harbour, beach, etc., until some expert comes along and informs them that secretly their dock is underwater. But there’s more. Where the story gets interesting, while remaining insolent rubbish, is that in paragraph six it explains that: “The report authors analyzed 385 peer-reviewed studies published over the past 15 years on sea level rise and the hazards it poses to coastlines. They found 90% relied only on assumptions from models rather than real, measured observations.” What? You mean the whole field is conducted inside a computer in brazen disregard of actual measurements? Surely that’s the lead, that’s the headline. That’s a staggering thing to discover and, as noted above, an even more staggering thing to discover and go right on believing everything else you believed about the climate crisis, including its sea-level-rise aspect. And it’s always-worse-than-we-thought aspect, since the article goes on immediately that: “It’s a ‘methodological blind spot’ that has resulted in widespread underestimations of coastal sea levels and people’s exposure to their related hazards, [study co-author Philip] Minderhoud said.” So, isn’t it serious that the people who’ve been doing all this stuff and fueling the panic for a decade and a half had this “methodological blind spot” of not caring about facts? Yes, but only in the usual way: “The findings suggest that if sea level rises by around 3 feet, it would put 37% more land underwater than currently assumed, affecting up to 132 million people across the world.” No no no no no no no, we cry. Stop. Just stop. The only way that claim can be true is if a bunch more land is already underwater than people believed just by looking at it. And there cannot be millions of fools out there who think something that’s underwater is above water until some academic wags a pencil at them. Or maybe there can, if people still believe this kind of journalism. Certainly, there are far too many fools in newsrooms and, it seems, climate computer labs. climatechangedispatch.com/sea-level-rise…

English
13
31
155
5.5K
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@PNWConservative I moved to eastern Washington in 2000 getting out of California and then it became California. Left Washington in 2020. Hopefully my birth state will stay sane with what few years I have left.
English
0
0
2
69
PNW Conservative
PNW Conservative@PNWConservative·
Washington Democrats are really trying to destroy this state. I live here for because of our beautiful mountains, nature, opportunity and family. Unfortunately, Democrats are stripping away the “opportunity”, causing many of us to find a new home.
PNW Conservative tweet media
English
43
75
407
3.4K
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@614clinton Now do bring, take, fetch. 90% of the authors I read haven’t a clue.
English
0
0
2
27
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@gatewaypundit Since this guy was getting guidance directly from Allah, I suppose Allah threw him under the bus.
English
0
0
1
43
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@Osint613 Didn’t the old supreme leader have a direct line to Allah and Allah threw him under the bus. Wonder what sage advice Allah has for Mojtaba .
English
1
0
1
1.9K
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
Prayer of “thanks to Allah” following the election of Mojtaba Khamenei as Leader of the “Islamic Republic of Iran.” Interesting how the ones managing the war, are allowing this to happen while missiles the size of buses with cluster bombs are being dropped on Israel.
English
128
126
1.4K
250.4K
GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE
GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE@GOP_is_Gutless·
Amazing operation. “HE WASN'T IN THE BUNKER”: The Shabbat Deception That Sealed Khamenei’s Fate 📉🇮🇷 New, jaw-dropping details have emerged regarding the final moments of Ali Khamenei. According to a senior Israeli official speaking to Fox News, the Supreme Leader was caught completely off-guard—not in a hardened bunker, but in an overground compound—because he believed the coalition was resting for the weekend. The key to the mission's success wasn't just firepower; it was a masterclass in psychological warfare. To lure the regime leadership out of their deep bunkers, American and Israeli officials orchestrated a massive deception campaign. On the Friday evening before the strike, top IDF generals and military officials conspicuously left their headquarters in Tel Aviv. They were seen heading home for Shabbat dinner, giving the impression that the military was shutting down for the religious holiday. In reality, those same generals snuck back into the "Pit" (the IDF’s underground command center) in disguise just hours later to coordinate the launch of Operation Epic Fury. Believing the skies were safe, Khamenei and his inner circle emerged for a high-level "strategy breakfast" on Saturday morning. By the time they realized the strike was inbound, it was too late. "They Didn’t Grasp It Quickly Enough" 🛡️🚀 The official told Fox News that even as dozens of planes were entering Iranian airspace, the regime’s command-and-control was in a state of total denial. Because Khamenei stayed overground, the coalition avoided the need for weeks of bunker-busting. They hit him where he sat. The official noted that the "House of Leadership" didn't react in time to move the Supreme Leader underground. Within 50 seconds, nearly 50 senior officials—including Khamenei—were eliminated. While the IDF was fully operational in its secret headquarters, the Iranian leadership was caught in the open, lulled into a fatal sense of security by a few Friday night dinner photos. Since the strike, the IDF has released footage showing the subsequent destruction of the actual underground bunkers Khamenei should have been in. Yesterday, 50 fighter jets dropped over 100 bombs to dismantle the massive network of tunnels beneath Tehran, ensuring no remaining regime "rats" can use them to hide.
GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE tweet media
English
88
408
2.4K
917.3K
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@amuse Does he still have open the option of boobs on the ground?
English
1
0
1
36
Connie 🇺🇸
Connie 🇺🇸@us_connie·
If you had to choose between the two, what would you choose? Truck or woman 🤔
Connie 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
409
16
219
6.5K
Connie 🇺🇸
Connie 🇺🇸@us_connie·
Only 1%will get this right,, what year..? 🤔
Connie 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
2.6K
78
766
103.7K
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
Just remember, every single conservative commentator would kill their own mother if it meant getting more likes and clicks on social media. Just understand how depraved all of them are and then you’ll realize why there is a lack of moral clarity by so many on the right.
English
1.2K
367
2.8K
1.6M
Wayne Clark
Wayne Clark@waredbird·
@Matt_Pinner I’ve done all if I can count recording music from FM radio to real to real tape.
English
0
0
0
21
🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸
🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸@NobodymrRobert·
What was the problem here. Not enough skill, not enough experience, or not enough speed.
English
3.4K
339
1.7K
141K