007TX Validator

430 posts

007TX Validator banner
007TX Validator

007TX Validator

@007TXValidator

Strategic infrastructure for the tokenized world. Committed to the secure, decentralized operation of the TX Network and the global democratization of asset own

Katılım Mart 2023
342 Takip Edilen613 Takipçiler
007TX Validator retweetledi
Watcher.Guru
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru·
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senators reach deal with White House to resolve crypto stablecoin yield dispute with banks.
English
377
1K
6.8K
390.8K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
The TX ecosystem's "compliance-first" thesis is spot on and refreshingly pragmatic for positioning as a serious competitor in the RWA/tokenization space. By baking KYC/AML, investor controls, sanctions screening, and programmable compliance directly into the L1 protocol (rather than bolting it on later), TX sidesteps the regulatory quicksand that trips up most chains. Pairing that with U.S.-headquartered ops, FINRA/SIPC-registered partners, institutional custody (Fireblocks/BitGo), and fiat rails makes it one of the few platforms that can credibly claim "built for real regulated markets" instead of hoping regs bend to crypto. In a world where institutions still demand TradFi-grade guardrails, this vertical integration—L1 + marketplace + regulated partners—creates real defensibility against pure DeFi plays or less structured RWA attempts. [Yes, I asked Grok to help me communicate my thoughts in this tweet...I am not that smart to communicate all that so elegantly by myself alone 😅]
007TX Validator@007TXValidator

Very good read. Encouraging to see the level of thought the TX team is putting into building a truly integrated, compliance-first ecosystem for real markets. @txEcosystem/compliance-first-building-for-real-markets-191876c75959" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@txEcosystem/c…

English
4
4
22
1.1K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
Very good read. Encouraging to see the level of thought the TX team is putting into building a truly integrated, compliance-first ecosystem for real markets. @txEcosystem/compliance-first-building-for-real-markets-191876c75959" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@txEcosystem/c…
English
0
3
16
2.1K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
@50saucy @JamesISO1138 @BrendanBird5 Agreed on one point: diversification is always sound strategy. It’s the first piece of solid advice you’ve shared today. Thanks for looking out for the community—I look forward to more of your constructive insights like this in the future.
English
1
0
5
1K
Ƨaucy
Ƨaucy@50saucy·
I'm watching you. An insane amount of tokens managed to get staked at a validator with no face. Number 1 validator with no voice in the community. No one else thinks this validator is dodgy? $TX
GIF
007TX Validator@007TXValidator

Big step forward in #RWA: Stobox just partnered with TX Ecosystem (the merged powerhouse from Sologenic + Coreum). Why this collaboration stands out: Stobox brings battle-tested, regulated tokenization expertise — they've tokenized over $500M in real-world assets across 100+ projects. Their stack (Stobox 4 for full lifecycle management, STV3 programmable assets, and StoboxDID for seamless compliance) handles issuance, investor onboarding, dividends, transfers, and more — all while staying fully aligned with EU VASP rules and global standards. TX Ecosystem complements this perfectly: it's built as the "operating system for tokenization," with a live marketplace for tokenized stocks, ETFs, and alternatives. What makes TX strong is its institutional-grade connections — deep integrations and partnerships with custodians and players like Kraken, Fireblocks, BitGo, Texture Capital (SEC-registered broker-dealer), and Brale. This gives real trading, settlement, and custody muscle that many pure issuance platforms still lack. Together, they solve one of the biggest bottlenecks in RWA right now: the disconnect between issuance and liquid, compliant trading/settlement. -Issuers tokenize assets compliantly and efficiently via Stobox. -Those assets flow seamlessly into tx's marketplace and custodian network for real secondary market access and institutional-grade security. In a fragmented space where silos slow adoption (and trillions in potential value are still off-chain), this is classic "1+1=3" infrastructure building. It's not about one winner taking all — it's about connecting specialized layers so the entire ecosystem scales faster, reduces friction, and attracts serious capital. As both teams said: collaboration over competition. This is exactly the kind of pragmatic, aligned move the RWA sector needs to move from pilots to mainstream utility.Excited to watch the integrations unfold.

English
7
1
14
1.4K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
Spot on, James. Some people prefer 'voice' in the community; I prefer 100% uptime and zero-commission legacy. As for the 'no face' comment—my mom says I'm the "George Clooney" of the TX ecosystem, but maybe that’s just the 'Mom Bias' talking seeing me through a very good filter. Appreciate the years of support!
English
0
0
1
28
James From CB1138
James From CB1138@JamesISO1138·
@50saucy @BrendanBird5 Nope, not one bit. @007TXValidator has been one of the best for years. Zero commission charged for years, until the chain forced him to. There was only a couple to choose from that charged no commission when Coreum was brand new. So his grew and grew. Not everyone is on X all day
English
2
0
4
157
007TX Validator retweetledi
tx
tx@txEcosystem·
This is a monumental moment for the industry. The SEC and CFTC just delivered the harmonized regulatory clarity builders and investors have been waiting years for. Clear lines. Clear rules. For the first time, a coherent framework that addresses how federal securities laws actually apply to crypto assets. tx was built with this framework in mind. Compliant issuance, regulated access, and the purpose-built infrastructure to operate within it.
English
5
64
178
11.4K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
Big step forward in #RWA: Stobox just partnered with TX Ecosystem (the merged powerhouse from Sologenic + Coreum). Why this collaboration stands out: Stobox brings battle-tested, regulated tokenization expertise — they've tokenized over $500M in real-world assets across 100+ projects. Their stack (Stobox 4 for full lifecycle management, STV3 programmable assets, and StoboxDID for seamless compliance) handles issuance, investor onboarding, dividends, transfers, and more — all while staying fully aligned with EU VASP rules and global standards. TX Ecosystem complements this perfectly: it's built as the "operating system for tokenization," with a live marketplace for tokenized stocks, ETFs, and alternatives. What makes TX strong is its institutional-grade connections — deep integrations and partnerships with custodians and players like Kraken, Fireblocks, BitGo, Texture Capital (SEC-registered broker-dealer), and Brale. This gives real trading, settlement, and custody muscle that many pure issuance platforms still lack. Together, they solve one of the biggest bottlenecks in RWA right now: the disconnect between issuance and liquid, compliant trading/settlement. -Issuers tokenize assets compliantly and efficiently via Stobox. -Those assets flow seamlessly into tx's marketplace and custodian network for real secondary market access and institutional-grade security. In a fragmented space where silos slow adoption (and trillions in potential value are still off-chain), this is classic "1+1=3" infrastructure building. It's not about one winner taking all — it's about connecting specialized layers so the entire ecosystem scales faster, reduces friction, and attracts serious capital. As both teams said: collaboration over competition. This is exactly the kind of pragmatic, aligned move the RWA sector needs to move from pilots to mainstream utility.Excited to watch the integrations unfold.
Mike McCluskey@MikeMcC1uskey

The RWA market will be built through collaboration, not silos. We’re excited to work with @StoboxCompany to explore integrations, support new tokenization initiatives, and help expand the infrastructure layer for the next generation of on-chain assets. Big thanks to the whole Stobox team!

English
4
10
49
3.9K
007TX Validator retweetledi
Artem | TX
Artem | TX@alinetskyi·
I've noticed some misunderstanding of PSE mechanism in $TX, so I dedicated some time outside of working hours and put together this simple tool that will estimate how much $TX will be added to your existing delegations on the next PSE event. It's really simple: 1. Connect your wallet (Only Keplr is supported for now) 2. Calculate your distribution amount (It takes about 2-3 minutes) tx-pse.today Looking forward to your feedback 🙏
Artem | TX tweet media
English
32
31
84
4.9K
007TX Validator retweetledi
Eleanor Terrett
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett·
🚨JUST IN: The @SECGov and @CFTC have issued joint, Commission-level interpretive guidance outlining how federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets and transactions. This follows a submission to OIRA earlier this month signaling the agencies’ intent, and was approved by all three SEC commissioners (Atkins, Peirce, Uyeda) as well as @ChairmanSelig. The guidance establishes a token taxonomy and addresses how activities like staking, mining, airdrops, and wrapping are treated under existing law. Notably, SEC Chair @SECPaulSAtkins says it reflects that most crypto assets are not themselves securities and that investment contracts can come to an end. While interpretive guidance doesn’t change the law, it reflects how regulators intend to apply it, giving the market a clearer directional signal. Separately, this is distinct from the SEC’s still-pending rulemaking on crypto asset offerings.
Eleanor Terrett tweet media
English
94
615
2.5K
301.3K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
There is no reason to change validator unless you feel the need to. Nearly all validators at the moment are doing well in terms of stability. My 2-cents is that you should be with the validator that aligns with (a) your financial interest which normally aligns with the lowest comission and (b) the one that provides value for you personally, whether it is on being a source of information, or whether it is a project that that validator is running on parallel that adds value to the TX system and that you feel connected to. So in summary, this is a decision that has more to do with your own personal preference. In reality, there is no no a good or bad choice as long as you are happy with your decision
Nobell0824@MoojongSong

@AwarenessLvL10 @BRW_Solo @007TXValidator I am staking at the zenlaunge should I change the validator??

English
3
2
21
1.7K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
Thanks for taking the time to clarify the proposal and explain the mechanics behind it. I understand the intention and the effort to create predictability and transparency around the community allocation. That said, my view remains that this is not the right moment to modify how the ecosystem is structured. The current tokenomics — including the 40B community allocation — were already known when Proposal-29 was discussed and ultimately passed with strong community support. For that reason, I don’t think it makes sense to revisit or reshape its spirit so early in the life of the network. I also want to clarify something important for anyone delegating to our validator (or any validator), because this is often misunderstood: delegating does not remove your voting power. In TX (Cosmos-based governance), delegators always keep their own vote: • If you do not vote, your validator’s vote is applied to your delegated tokens. • If you vote yourself, your vote overrides the validator’s vote for the tokens you delegated. So even if a validator votes one way, your own vote will be counted according to your choice for your stake. The validator’s vote therefore only represents: • their own self-stake, and • the stake of delegators who choose not to vote themselves. In other words, if proposals move forward, every delegator still has a direct voice in governance. I’m simply making my position transparent. Anyone delegating to our validator who disagrees with this view can vote differently, and their vote will be counted exactly as they cast it in the final tally.
EndTimesB@AwarenessLvL10

Don’t miss the main point of the proposal- it does t rearrange, modify or suggest anychanges to validators and founders. The main focus is how the 40% community allocation is distributed and protected from outside scavenging, siphoning and misuse. The paradigm used is an extension of the founders allocation. The founders have a protected 60% and it has distinct designations and earmarks. Our proposal does the same. It locks in 1/2 of the 40billion for legacy holders at a one time snapshot- so everyone is guaranteed their share of the community PSE at an equal 1/83 a month over 83 months to make them whole and at the same time validators have a constant, predictable PSE stream. The other 1/2 of the 40billion is used for growth of the community, staking with no outside pillaging of the supply for projects, grants or skimming wallets. Funding/ grants come exclusively from the founders. -no dilution from outside sources and all legacy holders and whoever stakes at the time of the snapshot will receive a smart-contract with their 1/83 setup to drop every month based on what they have staked. How can you not get behind this level of transparency? Coreum and Sologenic holders both have been diluted to a puddle. This proposal allows all holders to get a constant PSE to make them whole over the 83 months and validators get constant predictable / measurable growth. Community trust restored and guardrails established on how the community PSE can be spent. Sounds like a win win to me.

English
5
4
25
6.2K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
Thanks for sharing the proposal and for taking the time to think about the long-term structure of the TX ecosystem. I appreciate the effort and the intention to protect the network’s future. Personally, I’m not supportive of governance or tokenomic changes at this stage. TX is still in its early phase, and the priority right now should be allowing the network to launch, stabilize, and grow under the framework that was designed for it. One of the main reasons many of us are here is because we trust the team building TX. They have access to far more operational data and modeling than the rest of us, and they designed the current tokenomics with a specific strategy in mind. My view is that the most constructive approach right now is to give them the room to execute and deliver on that plan before we start revisiting structural elements of the system. That doesn’t mean governance discussions are not valuable — they absolutely are — but in my opinion those conversations will be more meaningful once the network has had time to operate and we can evaluate things based on real experience rather than early assumptions. For that reason, my preference would be to allow TX to run under the current structure for a while before considering proposals that modify governance or token distribution. At the end of the day, participation in any ecosystem comes down to conviction. If someone believes in the team and the direction of the project, the reasonable approach is to give them time to execute. If someone does not share that level of trust, there are many other opportunities in the market where they may feel more comfortable allocating their capital.
Rick Sanchez 🌴 🎰@schwifftynhere

@007TXValidator @RippleForesty This article details almost anything you would need to know about a proposal that has been worked on. I would greatly appreciate you taking a look at it and providing any feedback you may have

English
8
0
21
1.7K
007TX Validator
007TX Validator@007TXValidator·
I believe the problem is that I only allow messages from people I follow (I was getting at one point lots of nonsense and fishing). You can try now (I followed you) and see if it works. regardless, and as I mentioned earlier I prefer public conversations. I am not fun of DM discussions, I don't think it serves the community overall
English
2
0
3
154
RIPPLE FORESTY
RIPPLE FORESTY@RippleForesty·
.@007TXValidator what's your take on incoming proposal that is cooking with regards to legacy community? Your Dm is locked, so I am asking you publicly. However, I dont know if you have seen it.
English
1
2
9
859