Nick Carpinito

2.4K posts

Nick Carpinito banner
Nick Carpinito

Nick Carpinito

@0xMetaLight

Research @blockworksres / @Blockworks | Cooking @DePINPulse

Boston Katılım Aralık 2021
1.4K Takip Edilen3K Takipçiler
Nick Carpinito retweetledi
Ryan | Loading... 🇺🇸
Reflecting on my time at Blockworks, I’d be remiss not to highlight the phenomenal work of the @blockworksres analyst team. The BWR team went from *zero* to the leading crypto research & data platform in the industry. There are many reasons why - raw talent, org culture, ambition, open mindedness, discipline alpha process, etc etc. I could write 10,000 words on why this team is special. But at the end of the day, success in our industry boils down to one thing: prediction. More specifically, being right about the future when everyone else is wrong. There are few teams that have been as ahead of the curve on so many industry trends. Below I reflect on some specifics. *Alpha* - the team correctly identified that *alpha* is the critical wedge for a crypto research shop. Plenty of research sounds really smart, but historically, it was rare that crypto research was aimed at helping investors generate exceptional returns. Coming from tradfi, for me, this was an obvious gap in our industry. So much of crypto research was just waxing poetic about some improbable future state, or diving far too deep on some questionably relevant technical upgrade. Fun to read, doesn’t help me invest. We recognized this gap & went the other direction: we benchmarked ourselves to the price of bitcoin. Analysts were expected to find underappreciated opportunities & measure their call against the market. We developed a process for identifying alpha opportunities and achieved consistently strong hit rates on both long & short calls as a result, making a name for ourselves in the crowded crypto research space. *Fundamentals* - What sticks out to me from 2024: being laughed at. Constantly. The highest performing tokens have a good narrative, they told us. Nothing else matters, FDV can go as high as narrative & 'memetic value' can take it. We got strange looks at best, & backlash at worst, when we applied traditional valuation measures and competitive frameworks to tokens, proposed shorting popular tokens with ridiculous valuations, and helped popularize REV accounting, which quantified revenue & free cash flow for smart contract platform tokens. We focused on traditional metrics, business strategy & durability of cash flows while the entirety of ct was focused purely on stories. Fast forward 24 months, & it is now *obvious* to the vast majority of crypto market participants & ct that fundamental analysis & a traditional valuation lens were the correct ways to assess token opportunities over the period. So how did we get this right? Why did this happen in 2024 and not 2021? The BWR team correctly understood that, as the marginal buyer of crypto assets flips from degen/retail to institutional/tradfi, market characteristics would start to mirror the values of that new investor class. Fundamental measures like revenue would *obviously* be top of mind, and valuations must make sense. It’s a new market now, and only a handful of people got this write. I like to think Blockworks was one of the voices leading this change. *Shorts* - I’ve been told by a number of people that BWR was the first research shop to write explicit short reports. A simple “This is not the right price for this token” goes a long way, and we did this when most were extremely critical of us for doing so. It was never personal, just objective, as best as we could possibly be. Our hit rates here were high, but most importantly, we weren't dogmatic about our positions. We'd happily go long or short any token at any time. When the facts changed, we changed. At any rate, I like to think we helped people avoid mispriced assets over the past 2+ years. *Solana ecosystem* - The team was super early to SOL & the Solana ecosystem, when it was *extremely* unpopular. They nailed SOL’s rise in Q3/Q4 2023 (before my time at BWR), and nailed follow through. We were super early to identify pumpfun and tg bots as legitimate businesses in crypto, and reasoned about the knock-on effects of their activity on the broader ecosystem. Through 2024, we correctly shifted focus to the then emerging solana ecosystem, which is now, by many measures, the most commercially successful ecosystem in crypto. *Hyperliquid* - the BWR team, led by @GoldDefi and @salveboccaccio, correctly identified hyperliquid as an emerging & likely dominant perps platform, with an airdrop worth farming. Then @shaundadevens took the lead, deepening our coverage & correctly nailing the importance of HIP-3 & RWA markets. There are countless more examples I could point to, but I won’t attempt to cover them all here. What stands out is the consistency and the clarity of the mission: be ahead of the curve, popular industry opinion be damned. I’m grateful to have been part of such a talented group, & I have no doubt they’ll continue leading from that front. you can follow the team here: @blockworksres @0xMether @salveboccaccio @0xcarlosg @marcarjoon @Kunallegendd @shaundadevens @_dshap @defi_kay_ @0xMetaLight @minnus
Ryan | Loading... 🇺🇸@ryanconnor

Personal Update: This is my last week at Blockworks. What @JasonYanowitz & @MikeIppolito_ have built is truly exceptional - high talent density, high work ethic, *great* people. I’m gonna miss this team, & I’m grateful for everyone here that made this chapter special. I’m just lucky to have been a part of it. There is no doubt in my mind Blockworks continues to grow and dominate data, research, & podcasts. This team SHIPS like no other. @smyyguy, @EffortCapital, @0xMether, @GoldDefi, @fejau_inc and the rest of the team are just getting started. Excited for what’s ahead. On to the next thing. More soon.

English
4
5
65
5.2K
Nick Carpinito
Nick Carpinito@0xMetaLight·
Most of these critiques are fair. But "subsidized by emissions" is not the gotcha. Early infrastructure networks price below cost to bootstrap supply. The real question is whether the incentive mechanism produces genuine coordination that wouldn't otherwise exist. For distributed GPU capacity, there's early evidence it does. The legitimate concerns are elsewhere. Most subnets generate no real revenue, value accrual to TAO + SN tokens is opaque, and self-reported benchmarks collapse under a second eval. The more useful question is if the subsidy producing durable infrastructure, or just renting activity that disappears when emissions decline?
Vadim@zacodil

Show me one Bittensor "achievement" that works without $TAO inflation subsidy. I went through them. Here's what I found: 1. Chutes "85% cheaper than AWS" - Miners subsidize compute in exchange for TAO emissions. Not architectural efficiency. In February 2026 Chutes killed the free tier because specific users were consuming 100-324x their subscription value. Surprising when the subsidy ends. 2. Chutes "privacy and censorship resistance" - Miners receive your raw request in plaintext on their hardware. They can log everything. TEE is "in development." For any real enterprise use case this is a blocker, not a feature. Censorship-resistance is for people who can't pass KYC, not for B2B. 3. Chutes "adversarial validation" - Multiple miners cross-check each other's outputs. Sounds robust. In practice it's latency overhead on top of already slow decentralized routing. Fireworks delivers 0.17s TTFT. Chutes doesn't publish theirs. 4. Covenant-72B "first decentralized large model" - Underperforms LLaMA-2 on most benchmarks. LLaMA-2 came out nearly 3 years ago. LLaMA-3.3 70B was trained on 15T tokens, Covenant on 1.1T. Technically interesting experiment with SparseLoCo. Calling it a competitive product is dishonest. 5. Ridges "beat Claude on SWE-bench" - Not on the official swebench leaderboard. All numbers are self-reported by the team selling the SN62 subnet token. For context: open-source Live-SWE-agent on top of Claude Opus 4.5 scores 79.2% on Verified - one repo, one week of engineering, no blockchain. 6. Ridges "4% to 41% in one week breakthrough" - They started from zero with no proper prompting or scaffold. Decentralization didn't improve the model. They just correctly configured an agent framework on top of DeepSeek. Any ML engineer reproduces this in a few days. 7. Ridges "winner-takes-all competition" - Agents use DeepSeek and Llama through Chutes. Subnet 64 subsidy feeds Subnet 62 subsidy. One inflation finances another. The narrative calls this composability. The reality is circular subsidy. 8. Ridges benchmark overfitting - The team themselves admitted: when they added Polyglot alongside SWE-bench, score dropped from 88% to 17-18%. Recovered to 41% within weeks. Classic benchmark overfitting, not real agent improvement. Exactly why they're absent from official leaderboards. 9. Subnet validation problem - For code you can run tests. For the other 120+ subnets (text, analysis, predictions) - validators vote subjectively. This opens the door to validator collusion and score gaming. The core unsolved problem of the protocol that nobody talks about. 10. 2024 security breach - Real wallet exploit through vulnerability in Python package v6.12.2. Network went into safe-mode, transactions frozen. For "trustless permissionless infrastructure" - instructive. The only honest Bittensor thesis: token subsidy aggregates distributed GPUs cheaper than building a datacenter. Interesting bet that this advantage survives as emissions decline. Unproven so far. I'm explicitly not looking at price - I don't care if $TAO is $100 or $500. I'm asking about the product. But judging by the thousands of people tweeting about Bittensor right now - most of them are looking at exactly the price.

English
3
0
1
180
Jack 🟪
Jack 🟪@JackMandin·
Tomorrow marks my 1-year anniversary at Blockworks. Since joining, I've had the chance to dive deep into onchain lending markets. Excited to share some of my key insights on the economics of this exciting sector next week at DAS NYC. See you there.
Jack 🟪 tweet media
English
2
3
30
3.5K
Nick Carpinito retweetledi
Chris Lehman
Chris Lehman@LehmanBrother42·
Crypto friends: see you all at @blockworksDAS next week.
Chris Lehman tweet media
English
2
3
13
686
Nick Carpinito
Nick Carpinito@0xMetaLight·
PJM capacity prices jumped 9.3x, not because of supply/demand, but because a central planner ran a bad sim. ERCOT has the same AI buildout. No price shock. The culprit is market design and interoperability, not megawatts. Bullish VPPs newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/are-ai-datac…
English
0
0
3
152
Nick Carpinito retweetledi
Blockworks
Blockworks@Blockworks·
We’ve launched a new buy button on Blockworks, sponsored by @krakenfx. It gives readers a simple, direct path to Kraken when they’re ready to explore buying crypto. From research to action, with fewer steps.
Blockworks tweet media
English
5
6
45
12.3K
Nick Carpinito
Nick Carpinito@0xMetaLight·
DoubleZero making bold moves here: - Revenue shifting from block reward fees to shred data access - Revenue now distributed to client teams in addition to validators and fiber contributors - Approaching a supermajority of network stake, likely accelerated by the above
DoubleZero@doublezero

2/ First: Zero fees. The 5% block reward fee is gone for every existing and new DoubleZero-connected validator, effective as of Epoch 939. Now carrying ~46% of Solana’s network stake, DoubleZero is maturing from a bootstrap protocol into an economic engine for Solana. Validators are not paying fees anymore. You’re getting paid, through the protocol. Read on…

English
0
0
3
237
Nick Carpinito retweetledi
Digital Asset Summit 2026
Digital Asset Summit 2026@blockworksDAS·
NEW: @BNYglobal to speak at DAS NYC Hear from Robin Vince on how he’s driving digital transformation at one of America’s most storied financial institutions
Digital Asset Summit 2026 tweet media
English
1
3
14
756
Nick Carpinito retweetledi
Daniel Shapiro
Daniel Shapiro@_dshap·
The CEO of one of the worlds largest banks will be speaking at DAS in two weeks Best institutional conference in crypto, hands down
Daniel Shapiro tweet media
English
3
4
17
447