Morlex

@insomnia_vip that’s is full

@0xMorlex I wanna to see full lecture mate

An Anthropic engineer spent 15 minutes on stage explaining how they actually build agents the takeaway is almost boring: a clear role, the right context, the right tools, no frameworks, no magic that's not a research project. that's a claude project Most people use claude ai like a search bar. Open tab, ask, close, repeat. Every session starts from zero. Projects kill that. System prompt + your files + memory that persists across every chat. That's not a chat window it's a full-time specialist that already knows you. the 7 i run every day: → morning brief: news + inbox + tasks in 3 min → content engine: writes in my voice, not "AI voice" → research lab: deep dives that remember every session → second brain: connects everything I've ever saved → inbox zero: triages + drafts the whole inbox in 10 min → code helper: already knows my stack, no re-explaining → strategist: honest pushback, not comfortable answers 7 specialists. one $20 sub. setup cost: one weekend The part everyone skips: the context files. The system prompt is copy-paste. The files are what make it yours Watch the 15-min talk, then save the full setup below

@0xMortyx enjoy the show

@0xMorlex i gona watch it tonight

GitHub VP on running Claude at scale: At enterprise volume, the model isn't the bottleneck the harness around it is In 30 minutes Mario Rodriguez reveals GitHub's actual production stack: caching, harnesses, advisor models that review every call Caching + harnesses + advisors Worth more than a $500 vibe-coding course

@de1lymoon i hope it will be helpful

@0xMorlex good material for study, i've saved it

@MyWestLord with claude = limitless potential

Most people use Claude like Google. Ask a question. Get an answer. Close the tab. Here’s what the other 5% are doing: → Building entire websites and mobile apps no code. A song randomizer that used to take months. Done in 1 hour. UI, UX, backend Claude handles all of it. → Scraping YouTube videos, articles, and API docs in seconds. Paste a link. Get a 4-minute brief instead of 50 hours of reading. → Plan Mode breaks your prompt into sub-tasks and catches what you missed. You think you know what you’re building. You don’t. Plan Mode figures it out before you waste 3 hours on the wrong version. → /everyone shows every message you’ve sent. Click any of them. Project reverts to that exact point. → /output style explanatory every Claude response now includes a box explaining exactly why it made that decision. → Auto-review on every GitHub PR. Claude watches the pull request before it merges. No deleted files. No surprise rollbacks. You’re using 10% of a tool that’s free. The other 90% is sitting there waiting.

@de1lymoon definitely need to try it

@0xMorlex just 6 patterns you have to try, thanks for sharing alpha

Andrej Karpathy keeps repeating one idea: the gap stopped being talent. it's leverage anthropic just showed the Claude Code version of that idea: you don't need one smarter agent. you need an org of agents a real engineering pod researcher, builder, reviewer, QA, strategist costs $20,000+/m as a solo builder you can't justify that, so you do all five jobs yourself and call it discipline here's what most people miss: you don't need a team of people. you need their roles. and a role is just system instructions, context, tools, and a clear job. that's exactly what Dynamic Workflows are 6 patterns, one Claude Code setup: > classifier: figures out what kind of task this is > fan-out agents: split 50 files, bugs, docs, or claims into parallel work > verifier: checks the result without self-bias > filter: kills weak ideas before they reach you > tournament judge: picks winners through pairwise comparison > loop agent: keeps going until the goal is actually done the old move was asking Claude to do the work. the new move is asking Claude to design the machine that does the work most people are still prompting like employees. the move is being the org. watch Karpathy’s talk, then save the 14-step Claude Code setup below

@0xCodez Thank you for such an alpha

@0xMorlex Amazing share bro ! thanks for your support

@helperone_ai templates as a base, then tweak per task, output stays surprisingly stable once the role prompt's locked in

@0xMorlex Do you script the role prompts or tweak them per task? Curious how stable the output stays

Andrej Karpathy keeps repeating one idea: the gap stopped being talent. it's leverage a real team researcher, writer, editor, assistant, strategist costs ~$5,000/mo. as a solo creator you can't justify that, so you do all five jobs yourself and call it discipline. here's what most people miss: you don't need a team of people. you need their roles. and a role is just a system instructions, context, the right tool. that's exactly what an agent is. 5 roles, one $20 Claude sub: > research analyst: turns 45 min of scrolling into a 3-min brief > content writer: writes in your voice, not a generic one > editor: kills the weak draft before the internet sees it > exec assistant: triages the inbox, picks your top 3 > strategist: decides what to make, pushes back when you're wrong a $5,000 team for $20. zero sick days, zero onboarding, drafts at 3am most people are still the employee. the move is being the org watch the talk, then save the full setup below

@de1lymoon hope this will be useful

@0xMorlex leverage > talent. saved this

@0xMortyx everyone needs to see this

@0xMorlex i hope more people will see it