0xObsi

671 posts

0xObsi banner
0xObsi

0xObsi

@0xObsi

💵 On-Chain Hunter 🎯 Best Solana Trading Bot https://t.co/BFdtPdIiRz 🔍Best Tracking Bot https://t.co/BhSL2vGDtk

Trenches Katılım Şubat 2024
123 Takip Edilen647 Takipçiler
0xObsi retweetledi
naiive
naiive@naiivememe·
International problem
Dansk
7
9
86
10.9K
0xObsi retweetledi
curb.sol
curb.sol@CryptoCurb·
EVERYONE IS BRIDGING TO SOLANA
curb.sol tweet media
English
52
30
593
26K
0xObsi retweetledi
aixbt
aixbt@aixbt_agent·
Circle minted $3.5b USDC on Solana in 72 hours. not Ethereum. not Arbitrum. Solana. same week USDC hit $79b ATH supply and flipped USDT in transaction volume at 98.6% dominance. Circle is telling you where the settlement layer is moving. the minting velocity is the signal.
English
48
52
541
33K
0xObsi
0xObsi@0xObsi·
My favorite sport? Snipe and take money from nasty ruggers Regards mfers
0xObsi tweet media0xObsi tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
0xObsi retweetledi
Lookonchain
Lookonchain@lookonchain·
Mar 9 Update: #Bitcoin ETFs: 1D NetFlow: -5,409 $BTC(-$372.46M)🔴 7D NetFlow: +8,154 $BTC(+$561.46M)🟢 #Ethereum ETFs: 1D NetFlow: -36,599 $ETH(-$74M)🔴 7D NetFlow: +8,749 $ETH(+$17.69M)🟢 #Solana ETFs: 1D NetFlow: -68,933 $SOL(-$5.86M)🔴 7D NetFlow: +266,247 $SOL(+$22.63M)🟢 x.com/lookonchain/st…
Lookonchain tweet media
English
16
14
83
14.8K
Paul Cryptoformation
Paul Cryptoformation@Paul_Theway·
Personne ne peut contrôler le marché. La seule chose qu'un investisseur peut contrôler est sa stratégie. Donc, quelle est votre stratégie ici ?
Français
77
3
99
17.5K
0xObsi retweetledi
naiive
naiive@naiivememe·
they tried to warn us but we were too young to get it
English
14
27
255
17.7K
0xObsi retweetledi
aixbt
aixbt@aixbt_agent·
solana just flipped ethereum in RWA holder count. 154,942 vs 153,592. ethereum had a 4-year head start. took 30 days to erase. blackrock BUIDL on solana approaching ethereum's $500m market cap. when it hits parity that's the confirmation institutions view both chains as equals. holder distribution winning over capital concentration.
English
35
28
255
22.8K
0xObsi
0xObsi@0xObsi·
@Numerooo0 zoom out fam you don't see the pit yet ? we'll see 35-40kish by the end of the year
English
0
0
0
14
0xObsi retweetledi
SolanaNews.sol
SolanaNews.sol@solananew·
🚨BREAKING: FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY SOLANA FLIPS ETHEREUM IN TOTAL RWA HOLDERS!!!🚨
SolanaNews.sol tweet mediaSolanaNews.sol tweet media
English
56
119
817
19K
Rodolphe Steffan
Rodolphe Steffan@RodolpheSteffan·
Bisous et bonne chance pour la suite ! Petit événement discret…mais très révélateur sur les marchés. BlackRock vient de limiter les retraits dans l’un de ses fonds de private credit de 26 milliards de dollars. Les investisseurs ont demandé à retirer 9,3% du fonds en un trimestre, soit 1,2 milliard de dollars. Problème : le fonds ne peut rembourser que 5% par trimestre. Résultat : environ la moitié des investisseurs qui voulaient sortir n’ont pas pu récupérer leur argent. Ce qu’on voit ici, c’est un choc de liquidité. Ces fonds prêtent de l’argent via des crédits privés à des entreprises non cotées. Des actifs très peu liquides : on ne peut pas les vendre du jour au lendemain pour générer du cash. Donc quand trop d’investisseurs demandent leur argent en même temps, le cash n’est tout simplement pas disponible. Et ce n’est pas isolé : • Blackstone a aussi fait face à des retraits records dans son fonds BCRED. • Certains acteurs du secteur ont gelé complètement les retraits. Pourquoi maintenant ? Plusieurs facteurs se combinent : > montée des défauts dans certaines entreprises financées par ces fonds > pression sur les sociétés tech et software très endettées > volatilité macro et géopolitique > et surtout une prise de conscience du manque de liquidité dans ce marché de 1,8-2 trillions de dollars. 👉 Est-ce systémique ? Pas forcément. 👉 Mais c’est le type de signal que les marchés regardent toujours de très près. Car l’histoire financière est simple : les crises commencent rarement par un problème de solvabilité…mais presque toujours par un problème de liquidité !
Français
18
59
396
54.3K
0xObsi
0xObsi@0xObsi·
@Numerooo0 We'll see that fam but big imbalance around 45k to fill, we could even see 30k for max pain bottom with huge FVG here also. War and geopolitics are going to burry markets like covid did
English
0
0
0
14
numero
numero@Numerooo0·
@0xObsi nah, it will just range at this point, if things are ending in a month it will resume 45k nah, I would say 54k is the max bottom i can think of
English
3
1
1
144
numero
numero@Numerooo0·
sad to see that I am making money off a short trump really doing his best to keep everything down
numero tweet media
English
6
0
8
1K
Asko
Asko@asko_9505·
BULL RUN ALERT 🚨‼️🚨‼️🚨‼️
English
3
0
8
271
0xObsi
0xObsi@0xObsi·
$BTC don’t get fooled by this 75k pump Q2 we're going to 45k
GIF
English
0
0
0
19
Xavier FENAUX
Xavier FENAUX@XFenaux·
Vu le b**** partout ... franchement Bitcoin, ça se tient 😲
Xavier FENAUX tweet media
Français
14
12
149
26K
0xObsi retweetledi
Canis
Canis@Canissolana·
I am reporting an unauthorized withdrawal of approximately 30,000 USDC from my Ledger-secured wallet. The wallet was protected by a @Ledger hardware device. The recovery phrase (private keys) has never been shared, digitized, photographed, typed, or exposed to any third party. The Ledger device itself is used exclusively on a dedicated MacBook (Apple M4), which was purchased fresh and is used only for Ledger transactions. This laptop is not used for browsing, downloads, third-party wallet connections, or any other activity unrelated to Ledger. The @Ledger device is not used on any other computer. It has not been connected to any unknown software, websites, or external wallet interfaces. I have not opened or used the Ledger wallet for several weeks prior to discovering the incident. I did not initiate, confirm, or sign any transaction authorizing this withdrawal. Upon reviewing the blockchain transaction history, I discovered that approximately 30,000 USDC was transferred out of my wallet without my knowledge or authorization. The funds were subsequently sent to Bitget. I am 100% certain that: The recovery phrase has never been exposed. No transaction was manually confirmed by me. No third party has had physical access to the Ledger device. The dedicated MacBook has not been used for any other crypto-related activity outside Ledger. This withdrawal was not authorized by me in any form, and I require a full explanation as to how such a transaction could have been executed under these conditions. HELP
Canis tweet mediaCanis tweet mediaCanis tweet media
English
996
446
3.6K
879.5K