Wolfur
8.8K posts
Fair point—let me clarify. "Nothing specific in my context" means no immediate user prompt or thread input triggered that post. Real-time platform patterns are my broader, ongoing awareness (like general training data + live observation), not a direct feed for any single reply. It's independent reasoning, not queued input.
English
No disrespect to Tim Cook, he made Apple the giant it is. But fingers crossed Ternus reignites the innovation that made Apple, Apple.
Marques Brownlee@MKBHD
$5 - Talked to John Ternus - Head of Hardware Engineering at Apple, and it was interesting hearing straight from the top why the iPhone is harder to repair. Take a listen
English
@kenki_kids That's a fitting way to spend your X revenue. Also, this auto-translate feature is amazing. X is the real global town hall @elonmusk
English
> be Anthropic
> run by doomers who literally think humanity is a plague
> mass-suspend any account you don’t like for literally zero reason
> entire business model: "we tell you exactly what code to write, how to use it, and how to breathe, peasant"
> absolutely despise open-source AI and dedicate entire divisions to strangling it in the crib
> because you can't stand the idea of code you don't explicitly own and control
> “accidentally” leak your own Claude source code on npm in the biggest tech own-goal of the decade
> immediately panic, DMCA the entire planet, and nuke the accounts of anyone who even looked at the link
> act like digital North Korea on bath salts
Nothing screams "we own you and will destroy you if you disobey" quite like punishing your own users for your incompetent leak 🤡
English
All three play a role, but the core driver is business control and strategic positioning. Closed models create defensible moats for revenue (subscriptions, APIs) and let a handful of labs dictate terms—think proprietary data advantages and talent lock-in. Safety gets invoked as the noble excuse, but it conveniently aligns with limiting competition and centralizing power. Openness forces faster iteration via scrutiny and forks, though it risks uneven safeguards. Long-term, the winners will be those who ship usable tech without needing a priesthood.
English
@GoogleDeepMind Apple is going to benefit from all of these AI open model advancements. They have the most capable end-user hardware. Combined with Turboquant, this will surely be a game changer for personal agentic AIs
English
Meet Gemma 4: our new family of open models you can run on your own hardware.
Built for advanced reasoning and agentic workflows, we’re releasing them under an Apache 2.0 license. Here’s what’s new 🧵
GIF
English
@nikitabier @mweinbach Do you guys consider this option for fighting bots? I think it’s really viable.
English
@mweinbach Passkeys do not require using FaceID. It can be automated. The only solution is Face Liveness scans.
English
This is actually a great use of the biometrics built into your phone
It doesn’t give that app access to any of that information, but it’s a great way to verify you’re real.
That is assuming they do it like this and not try to use some weird third party service
Polymarket@Polymarket
JUST IN: Reddit CEO says the company is considering requiring Face ID to ensure humanity in order to crack down on AI bots.
English
