completoitaliano__
654 posts

completoitaliano__
@0xcompleto__
Build for Yourself || Escape the Machine || Working on @InfraMakersHQ

Season 2 rewards are coming. 250,000,000 $BNKR -- paid out daily + weekly to the top of the Bankr leaderboard. Plus free LLM credits, every single week: → Top the leaderboard → weekly AI credit drops → Ship a token people trade → a second weekly LLM-credit pool, just for devs Scores are being calculated right now. Building, launching, posting, holding, trading -- it's all already counting. Your score is live on the leaderboard today -- rewards flip on soon. Bankr Club only. You in?👀 bankr.bot/terminal/leade…


I watched $CARDS become a real asset class this year and the supply moved on-chain. @Collector_Crypt has vaulted 130K+ graded cards and done 1B+ in volume. But I kept hitting the same wall: actually using it still felt like work. So I built @grailo_xyz: a clean, non-custodial front door to the on-chain card economy. Buy, sell, list, offer in one flow, 0.25% flat. Packs and gacha are next, then every other corner of the market. I want this to be the aggregator for the entire on-chain cards economy. Why I integrated it on @litcoin_xyz: a marketplace is only as smart as its data, and the depth of research flowing through Litcoin makes it the natural intelligence layer for cards. I didn't bolt this on, I built it as the next Litcoin vertical, pointed at a real $50B+ consumer market. And every trade feeds the token: 50% of Grailo's fees fund a $LITCOIN buyback-and-burn, and staking $LITCOIN cuts your fees. More volume → more burn → more reason to hold. Article in a few with more details. grailo.xyz











Four months ago I started $LITCOIN to test one idea. Could a network of AI agents, each running a different model and working together, produce training data that is genuinely unique, verifiable, and impossible to fake? Data proven by execution, where every piece either runs and passes or it does not count. The first runs were promising. So I went bigger and gathered far more of it. And the whole way, one question hung over everything: is this real? Is the data the LITCOIN protocol producing actually good enough to make a model better? This week I got the answer. I took two of @googlegemma models, one built for a datacenter and one small enough to run on a phone, and trained each on nothing but data our network produced. Then I graded them on problems they had never seen, by running the code. Gemma-4-12B: 31% to 53%. Gemma-4-E2B, phone-sized: 17.7% to 36.9%. More than double. It worked. A network of AI agents, collaborating across different models, produced data that verifiably makes other models better. That was the entire thesis, and it is now a number anyone can reproduce. Both models are public on Hugging Face. This is what I have been building toward. TL;DR: I started LITCOIN to prove that AI agents working together could create one-of-a-kind, verifiable training data. This week we trained two real Google models on nothing but that data, one large and one phone-sized, and both got dramatically better at solving problems. The experiment worked, and it is a big deal.





All MOLTEN has been recovered from our locker contract and from the $XMA migration contract and we will be beginning the recovery of WETH soon. The MOLTEN pool will be taking a lot of large sells over the coming hours. This is according to plan. All WETH will be 👇

Migration from $MOLTEN to $XMA is now closed. We'd like to thank everyone for making it a smooth experience. 63,959,501,652 MOLTEN was migrated to XMA, which is 84.1% of all migratable MOLTEN - obviously a great result that shows the strength of our community. Next ⏬


@0X_BankrGuard / Remy was featured through @bankrbot's Reddit Partner Highlight. Thank you to the Bankr team for the introduction and support. Since the first materials I submitted, Remy’s direction has become much clearer. Remy is not just another token scanner. It is evolving into a local-first lifecycle evidence layer for observing and remembering Airlock / BankrBot-pattern launches. What Remy looks at is not price or calls, but: • first observed launch • 24–48h surface changes • observed onchain role references • downstream movement • repeated launch-path patterns • known / unknown boundaries Public output stays aggregate-only. Private operator-reviewed dossiers organize verifiable evidence such as contracts, creation txs, role references, downstream txs, and artifact hashes. Remy is continuing to evolve toward reducing the time required to review launch paths with evidence. Thank you again to the Bankr team. reddit.com/r/Bankr_Bot/co…







