funky

Hey! I'm Irel, but you can call me Geodess. Biochemistry graduate, spent 3 years in med school, currently cabin crew at Emirates in Dubai. But honestly? My real obsession is AI, medtech, and Web3. Let me tell you why 🧵

@InevitableKD @notdvb @grok SO uptown

@notdvb @grok which building is that?

sad to be leaving this apartment soon. it's been an incredible 1.5y. time for a new chapter.

@0xKolten @aave Most legit team since 2017 and the Ethlend days. There's a reason why it has the highest revenue + TVL in all of DeFi.

Aave Labs is one of the few teams around today that’s been building since the ICO era. Despite all the work done so far, we still have lots more to do if we want @aave to operate in the arena of global finance. Alongside the other service providers, we’ll make sure Aave wins.

@0xKolten Push it to vote so we can stop talking about this. Let the votes do the talking

I'd like to offer my perspective to help clarify the facts around the recent DAO discussions and vote. The conversation began on Dec 11 with a discussion about ParaSwap's positive slippage referrals and then, after five days of discussing that, evolved into an ARFC. This escalation signaled a desire from the community to move toward a resolution. The ARFC was then discussed for an additional five days, generating hundreds of replies, tens of thousands of forum visits, and extensive engagement on socials. Following the DAO’s established framework, the proposal was moved to a Snapshot vote exactly as it was written. Proponents repeatedly stated that implementation details would be handled in a future “Phase 2,” and the consensus was that *this* vote was about the core principle and didn't need the fine print. Nor were there calls for revisions to the proposal itself. When Stani suggested an iterative approach, many people expressed a preference for avoiding such steps. Which is fair enough, given that wasn't the expressed goal of the proposal. Only after the vote was called did a new set of “soft rules” appear such as holiday voting periods and author consent. These are not part of our current written framework. If these are important considerations for the future, I agree they should be formally discussed and added to our governance process. I have also been named by a service provider for causing "reputational damage." IMO, the real damage comes from turning internal governance debates into a public spectacle. Amplifying negative press, pushing prediction markets, and spinning misleading narratives is what harms the brand. My prior work for the Aave ecosystem reflects the exact opposite of this behavior. My number one goal since I got hired has been to make Aave as successful as possible. That means growing the brand, increasing DAO revenue, and ensuring we all win together. This year, I’ve worked closely with all of Aave's service providers to amplify their work and align our efforts toward that shared success. I’ve been a token holder since the ETHLend days, and I’ve always believed Aave's strength comes from the DAO's ability to have these debates and then come together to make a decision. That can't happen with the rhetoric that's been amplified, and encouraged, by some involved in this discussion. This ongoing drama is overshadowing what has been Aave’s most successful year yet. I believe it is better for the DAO to vote and resolve this issue so we can all move forward together.

iETH hit the gym. now it’s superETH. staked ETH, but superchain-sized. mint on ink.

@nekonya_02 every unemployed person is a ceo

@MonetSupply that's the one principle of valuation: something has value if someone is willing to pay for it every valuation model is a heuristic for this

more buyers than sellers everything else is storytelling

Submitted Reward Vault Request for STONE-beraETH on protocol Kodiak with incentive tokens BERA, DINERO

Submitted Reward Vault Request for WETH-beraETH on protocol Kodiak with incentive tokens BERA, DINERO

Submitted Reward Vault Request for DINERO-WBERA on BEX with incentive tokens BERA, DINERO

from the boyco UI, this translates to c. $500k over 3 months pretty juicy stuff

How beraETH aims to replace WETH on Berachain 0:58 The Origin of Dinero and Its Evolution 3:09 pxETH Explained: How It Works and Why It Has the Highest Yield 4:30 Adoption Challenges and Security Concerns in the ETH Derivatives Market 7:43 How pxETH Differentiates Itself and Integrates with Berachain 9:50 The Concept of Branded ETH 11:54 Partnerships with Native Applications and DeFi Integrations 15:25 The Goal of Replacing WETH with beraETH 18:06 The Reasoning Behind the Rebranding from Redacted to Dinero 20:26 The Long-Term Vision for Dinero and the Future of Branded LSTs [Featuring @_funkyjunky from @dinero_xyz]

Discord member just leaked alpha 👀 Rough model for some beraETH Boyco yield.

A few juicy beraeth markets

@BigCheds 50x for bitcoin, 20x for eth 💀

My first ever $BTC price tweet. $1940 per coin If only I knew what I know now

wats beraETH

@dinero_xyz wats beraETH

Dinero coded. beraETH coming in Q5 🐻⛓

@0xAlunara I remember something similar on tiktok with anchor back in the day

1⃣ Have X amount of money 2⃣ Get a mortgage for X/2 (50% LTV = low rates) 3⃣ Buy a house 4⃣ Put the other X/2 in Aave for yield > mortgage rate Now you own a house, with liquid assets that can pay off the loan anytime you want but in the meantime earns you money.

There’s a new native LST on ZKsync 🦋 DeFi users can mint zkETH directly on ZKsync to earn ETH staking rewards through @dinero_xyz’s liquid staking protocol. Soon, zkETH will be available across the Elastic Chain, not just ZKsync Era.