TÂRÌQ™

1.4K posts

TÂRÌQ™ banner
TÂRÌQ™

TÂRÌQ™

@0xtariq_will

sensational

Katılım Haziran 2024
64 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
TÂRÌQ™
TÂRÌQ™@0xtariq_will·
The $REM TGE hype is unreal! @sleepdotfun Just 6 days in, and Sleep-to-Earn is already reshaping wellness in Web3. • Wearable integrations (Fitbit, Apple Watch) are live ✅ • Tier-1 CEX listings incoming 👀 • Web3 wellness is up 45% in 2024! 📈
TÂRÌQ™ tweet media
English
6
4
11
388
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
Arbitrum really pushing the programmable economy narrative lately But the real ones, builders knows the grind isn’t hype… it’s: Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Private mainnet-replay testnets, built-in contract simulations, analytics, and tooling are changing the game completely. No more blind deployments. Real builders test hard, iterate fast, and ship with confidence. The future belongs to teams building, not just scrolling timelines. So… what are you deploying this weekend?
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
contract.dev@contractdotdev

Any weekend plans? Me: Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship. Deploy. Simulate. Ship.

English
76
72
184
7.8K
TÂRÌQ™
TÂRÌQ™@0xtariq_will·
@rust_mane @blok_cap This is exactly the kind of infrastructure DeFi needs, moving from hype to actual sovereign wealth management
English
0
0
1
18
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
What if wealth management worked like open-source software instead of an exclusive private club? Most DeFi vaults stop at yield farming. But @blok_cap is building something far bigger; A fully on-chain decentralized private banking infrastructure designed for everyone.
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
English
63
27
75
4.9K
James Cole
James Cole@james84_·
Do you have 0 followers 🫪 Just reply = hello 👋 Lets follow you instantly 💚💜
James Cole tweet media
English
1.2K
105
680
34.3K
ONYEKA V ™
ONYEKA V ™@Sironyeka·
If you’re not monetized, just say hello. We will help you!
ONYEKA V ™ tweet media
English
2K
207
1.4K
76.7K
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
Every serious Web3 builder eventually learns the same painful lesson: most smart contracts don’t fail because the devs are bad, they fail because they were tested in unreal environments. Public testnets are too clean. - No real liquidity pressure. - No chaotic user activity. - No aggressive MEV behavior. - No true mainnet stress. Then projects deploy to mainnet and suddenly encounter MEV wars, oracle volatility, gas spikes, nonce failures, and user behavior that was never accounted for @contractdotdev is tackling that problem in a way that actually makes sense. @contractdotdev Stagenets simulate production-grade EVM conditions by replaying real mainnet activity in private testing environments. Instead of guessing how your protocol might behave after launch, builders can watch it react to realistic liquidity flows, live pricing conditions, transaction congestion, and stress scenarios before risking real funds. That’s a huge difference. A few features that stood out to me: → Replay historical chain conditions in real time → Stress-test contracts with custom tx activity → Import existing Hardhat & Foundry repos directly → Advanced dashboards for gas, TVL, oracle feeds & balances → Multi-chain support across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism & more The reality is: “Passed testnet” has never guaranteed “survives mainnet.” @contractdotdev feels like infrastructure built for builders who want fewer surprises and stronger protocols from day one Start building your own Stagenet here → app.contract.dev/app/projects
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
English
48
26
60
5.9K
TÂRÌQ™
TÂRÌQ™@0xtariq_will·
@0x_beryl @contractdotdev Being able to spin up a mainnet fork with real liquidity, blocks, and market volatility in under 2 minutes changes the game
English
0
0
1
24
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
Testing smart contracts just got a massive upgrade No more fake liquidity or outdated testnets. With @contractdotdev Stagenet, you can fork mainnet, deploy contracts, stress test with 10k+ transactions, and monitor everything through live dashboards, all in under 2 minutes. ✓ Real conditions ✓ Real data ✓ Real confidence before deployment. This is the kind of infrastructure that helps prevent exploits, failed launches, and costly mistakes before they ever hit mainnet. Ready to test in real mainnet conditions? Launch your own Stagenet here → app.contract.dev/app/projects
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
contract.dev@contractdotdev

Fully testing a smart contract on a live mainnet fork in under 2 mins. Deploy, simulate 10k txs, check dashboards all on Contract.dev. The best part? No fake liquidity. No frozen blocks. Just real mainnet conditions.

English
72
26
165
12.9K
SultaN🌍
SultaN🌍@TheSultaan001·
Second Gig today, Community Manager role, Somebody say Web3 jobs😌👌
SultaN🌍 tweet mediaSultaN🌍 tweet media
English
57
3
200
3.7K
SultaN🌍
SultaN🌍@TheSultaan001·
Kindly drop your sol wallets for some Pizza tokens tonight😌Giving mode
English
134
17
215
5.7K
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
Dev frustration is spending weeks testing a contract on public testnets… only for mainnet to instantly humble you Faucets stop working. RPCs lag. No real traffic. No real pressure. Everything feels stable until launch day brings gas spikes, failed nonces, race conditions, and angry users flooding the timeline. That’s why what @contractdotdev is building stands out. Private testnets that replay actual mainnet conditions and transaction pressure? That’s the kind of environment serious builders actually need. Public testnets can simulate code. But realistic infrastructure testing is what prevents disasters. No fake confidence. No nasty surprises after deployment. Just stronger contracts and better launches
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
contract.dev@contractdotdev

🚨BREAKING: WE ASKED DEVS WHY TESTNETS SUCK!

English
64
21
141
10.7K
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
contract.dev
contract.dev@contractdotdev·
🚨BREAKING: WE ASKED DEVS WHY TESTNETS SUCK!
English
132
104
502
28.7K
TÂRÌQ™
TÂRÌQ™@0xtariq_will·
@0x_beryl @contractdotdev Finally someone building proper staging environments for smart contracts. Stagenets sound like the missing staging environment we actually need for DeFi.
English
0
0
1
45
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
There's a moment every onchain dev dreads. Tests passed. Fork looked fine. Testnet worked. You deploy to mainnet and something breaks that you never saw coming. This isn't bad luck. It's a missing layer in the dev stack and that's what @contractdotdev is building🧵 👇
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
English
128
48
149
11.4K
TÂRÌQ™ retweetledi
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
No issues with the leaderboard being separate, but the only issue I have is the so called system that determines the quality of a post,.....you guys really needs to do a better job at that.....the post it marks as high quality most times are not,....some are just AI copy and paste where the guys that actually gives those really good high quality comments or quotes almost don't get any points for that And yes, the team....you guys can do better.....if you keep bringing this issue with the team, instead of them looking into it....they just brush you aside and threaten to ban/restrict you from the group which is just unprofessional, they're there to help.....not threaten......and maybe the team should not participate in any of the leaderboard because of course, they're the team.....they know how it works, the algorithms , everything.......so them participating is almost like cheating already
English
1
2
2
38
nabu
nabu@nabu_lines·
we’ve been running our community activation for the past 3 months and i’ve been testing different systems to see what actually drives real participation and quality output we started simple with members supporting each other’s posts, then introduced a registration system after that we added context based comment filtering, follow activations, and most recently an organic scraping point system based on content quality and quote tweets now i’m at the point where i need to decide the next evolution of the system one route is combining all these mechanics into one unified leaderboard the other is keeping each activation separate with their own rewards and rankings would love real feedback on: • how you would structure the prize pool distribution • what parts of the system are actually working vs not working • whether unified or separate leaderboards make more sense long term • any ideas to improve retention, quality, competition, and consistency without killing the organic participation trying to build something sustainable not just inflated activity numbers
nabu tweet media
English
64
18
118
2.5K
0xberyl.g || ⚖️
0xberyl.g || ⚖️@rust_mane·
NOMAD might be one of the most practical crypto products I’ve seen in a while. A wallet that works both online and offline? That’s a huge unlock for real-world adoption When you’ve got internet, it runs fully onchain with Solana-speed performance. Lose connection? It automatically falls back to SMS relay so you can still send crypto with basic mobile signal A few things that stood out to me: → AI-powered wallet actions → Self-custody by default → No KYC friction → Merchant-ready payment tools → Built for travelers, remote regions & emerging markets → Multi-chain support expanding soon Most crypto apps silently assume everyone has stable WiFi 24/7. @nomaddotfun feels like it’s actually designing for the rest of the world. Offline crypto is starting to feel very real 👀 Try it: trynomad.fun #NOMAD #OfflineCrypto #Web3
0xberyl.g || ⚖️ tweet media
English
16
8
26
1.7K