RonDawg retweetledi
RonDawg
16.7K posts

RonDawg
@1000101Binary
Terrestrial Follower of Logic
Texas, USA Katılım Şubat 2022
1.8K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
RonDawg retweetledi
RonDawg retweetledi

@pureMetatron My wife and I were just talking about this verse but I couldn't remember it. Thank you! God bless 💯🇺🇸✝️🙏
English
RonDawg retweetledi

"Ye shall not afflict any widow, or fatherless child. If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto me, I will surely hear their cry; and my wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless."
Exodus 22:22-24.
If you are a Christian and you afflict Erika Kirk and her children, you are sinning unto God and He shall hear their cries and the wrath of the Lord will be against you.
If you are atheist and you mistreat and attack Erika Kirk and her children, you may tell us you don't believe these verses, but what they prove even in a secular sense, is that you have less social integrity than bronze age/iron age people.
Either way.
Be compassionate and leave her alone.

English
RonDawg retweetledi

“The type of hate that you have for MAGA, the type of hate that you have for Trump, it's not from God. God does not instill hate. God does not put hate in your heart. That type of hate only comes from Satan.”
This is absolutely correct. I’ve never seen a hate like the hate I see towards President Trump and his supporters.
This is spiritual.
English
RonDawg retweetledi

Are you wondering why the entire Left Wing of America is melting down over this Supreme Court decision right now?
Constitutional⚖️lawyer here — Allow me.👋🏼
Today, SCOTUS dropped a 6-3 reality check in Louisiana v. Callais that has the usual race-hustler brigade frothing at the mouth. Justice Alito’s majority opinion just ruled that Louisiana’s congressional map — with its extra majority-Black district snaking across the state like Michelle Obama on Cialis — was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Why? Because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act didn’t require the state to play racial bean-counter and subordinate every traditional districting principle (compactness, communities of interest, you know, actual geography) to skin color. No compelling interest under strict scrutiny = GAME OVER. Boom. Equal Protection Clause wins again.
This isn’t “gutting” the VRA, you professional outrage farmers. It’s interpreting it correctly for the first time in decades. Alito laid it out crystal clear: The VRA is a SHIELD🛡️against actual discrimination, not a sword🗡️for engineering racial spoils systems or proportional representation by melanin quota.
You see, Louisiana’s map prioritized race above everything else without the required justification. That’s textbook reverse discrimination — treating non-Black voters as second-class citizens whose votes get diluted so Democrats can lock in “safe seats.” The 14th Amendment doesn’t do “equity” carve-outs; it demands equal protection for everyone. No more “but it’s for the minorities!” loopholes that just flip the racism script.
And yet, here come the usual suspects — the Congressional Black Caucus, their media megaphone, and every blue-check race baiter on X — screaming that this “dismantles Black voting power,” “revives Jim Crow,” and “ends democracy.”
Spare us the crocodile tears. These are the same folks who cheered on the race-based admissions, hiring quotas, and DEI hiring that screwed over Asians and whites… but suddenly “racism” is back on the menu when the Court says voters aren’t interchangeable racial pawns. Hypocrites. Your entire grift depends on keeping Americans sorted into victim blocs so you can harvest votes and donor cash.
NEWSFLASH: Treating people as individuals instead of skin-color commodities isn’t “suppressing” anyone — it’s the literal definition of civil rights.
This opinion is chef’s kiss well-reasoned constitutionalism. It flows straight from Shaw v. Reno-era precedents and the Framers’ vision: Race is the most suspect classification, not a magic wand for map-drawers. The VRA was born to crush poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black Americans from the ballot box. It was never meant to mandate racial gerrymandering as a permanent feature of American elections. SCOTUS just slammed the door on that perversion, forcing states to draw maps based on people, not pigmentation. Result? More competitive districts, less racial polarization, and an actual shot at post-racial politics. The left can’t handle it because their power model collapses without the division.
Fun fact for the woke warriors clutching their pearls in the replies: The Constitution is colorblind by design. It doesn’t care about your feelings, your “disparate impact” spreadsheets, or your need for perpetual victim status to stay relevant. Real equality means one set of rules for all — no reverse-racism exceptions, no matter how loudly you cry “systemic!”
Cry harder, identity-politics vampires. The adults in the robe just reminded everyone why we have a Constitution: to protect US from YOU.🫵🏼 America moves forward when we judge ballots by content of character, not color of district. Deal with it.🔥🇺🇸

English
RonDawg retweetledi
RonDawg retweetledi
RonDawg retweetledi

@randomyoko Low IQ thief named Ilhan is how... Needs to be locked up!
English

I’m Japanese and have lived in Japan my whole life, and even I wouldn’t make this kind of mistake in English.
How do you end up making a mistake like that when you’re in Congress?
Fox News@FoxNews
“World War Eleven… oh, two!” A resurfaced January 2025 clip shows Rep. Ilhan Omar misspeaking during remarks on immigration, as she reflects on how the U.S. has treated immigrant communities in the past. The clip is now resurfacing as the Democrat's broader comments on immigration come back into focus.
English
RonDawg retweetledi
RonDawg retweetledi

@BarackObama Barack Obama is the most divisive and racist president in history!
English
RonDawg retweetledi

@AndrewKolvet @HannahD16809 At this point, Candace Owens is a domestic terrorist and I think she should be charged as such
She is inciting violence against your organization against Erika Kirk, and against Republicans
English
RonDawg retweetledi

You have absolutely lost your mind.
YOU were the guy who was supposed to get us PAST sorting people by race.
You said judge people by character not color.
Now you're calling it "voter suppression" when the Court strikes down a district drawn ENTIRELY BY SKIN COLOR??!!
The "racial gerrymander" was YOUR SIDE'S MAP.
The Court rejected it... and you're calling that racial gerrymandering?!!!
That's an INVERSION OF REALITY.
MLK is rolling in his grave reading this.
He fought to STOP government from sorting people by skin color.
You just defended doing exactly that.
What happened to you, man?!!!

English

@RealCandaceO No one with any sense of actual sanity thinks you are anything other than a vindictive “clickbait” lunatic.
English

Very uncomfortable to watch. Painful prompter read.
A speech CLEARLY written by someone else. Objectively terrible so they will now pay for people to tell us otherwise.
Also, of everything I’ve said about Erika she chooses to respond to something I never said. They always lie.
Baron Coleman@baroncoleman
What's going on with this weird pre-record on the Charlie Kirk show? An angry lady in a server's costume from an Italian restaurant and, for some reason, a trucker hat tossed some word salad, and now they're just playing old clips of Charlie Kirk.
English













