Caesar_110
2.5K posts
Whilst the social media ban is well-intentioned, it’s unlikely to work given the mass adoption of VPNs. It will also mean the introduction of Digital ID via the back door. The real answer here is handsets for children with limited features.
@Miss_Snuffy If 90% of parents support it then why does the government need to step in? Honest question.
This is a Proof of Concept for the dynamic online censorship program in a real-time production environment. Next they plug in other demographics ('radicals'), triggers ('hate speech') and actions ('debanking') = CBDC/social credit score/agenda2030 It is not about the children.
My name is Gabe Einhorn. I’m a 24 year old founder, building VryfID, which verifies renters identity and income, then matches them with apartments they can actually afford. For landlords, this helps them fill units faster, increase occupancy, and raise NOI. I posted last week about an antisemitic incident, and since then it has blown up everywhere. Social media is flooded with people who hate Jews, and their only goal is to try to destroy us, as you see below. This guy just wants to destroy my business, and take down any Jewish person. Thank God, there are many good people out there who have been supporting me, and who are standing up to hate. If you are seeing this and want to be involved with what we are building, both with VryfID, as well as our fight against hate, please reach out.
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
This is a Proof of Concept for the dynamic online censorship program in a real-time production environment. Next they plug in other demographics ('radicals'), triggers ('hate speech') and actions ('debanking') = CBDC/social credit score/agenda2030 It is not about the children.
Starmer set to ban under-16s from social media platforms including TikTok and Snapchat bbc.in/4elIaCL
A 19-year-old college student quietly turns down a job interview, stupidly telling the company it's because he doesn't want to work for a Jew. Within two days: -- The billionaire founder of one of the world's most powerful corporations (Palantir) demands that the company release his the student's to the world. The company instantly complies. -- National media trumpet the incident and spread the student's name and face all over the place. -- A senior Trump DOJ official repeatedly urges the public to notify him if that student is ever hired anywhere in the future, promising to use his office to keep the student permanently unemployable. Adults with large, influential platforms -- pundits, media types, even elected officials -- right here on X routinely say things as bad as, and often much worse than, pretty much every other group you can think of without facing a single consequence let alone a completely unhinged coordinated campaign of very powerful people to run their lives forever:
This is a Proof of Concept for the dynamic online censorship program in a real-time production environment. Next they plug in other demographics ('radicals'), triggers ('hate speech') and actions ('debanking') = CBDC/social credit score/agenda2030 It is not about the children.
Everything about this clip is brilliant.
This is a Proof of Concept for the dynamic online censorship program in a real-time production environment. Next they plug in other demographics ('radicals'), triggers ('hate speech') and actions ('debanking') = CBDC/social credit score/agenda2030 It is not about the children.
Sean Strickland at UFC 250. Imagine being an 🇺🇸 American UFC Champion and not being allowed at a US event for criticizing a foreign terrorist state.
