123taafe retweetledi
123taafe
636 posts


@SkySportsPL Liverpool wont take what hes worth. So its a non starter isnt it.
English
123taafe retweetledi
123taafe retweetledi
123taafe retweetledi
123taafe retweetledi

@liverpoolfcsyd @ESPNUK You forgetting the red card take by jones pulling avout 20 seconds before ?. So you'd be down to 10 men. Most likely we'd score the penalty. Result would be the same.
English

That goal should of been chalked off... towards the end of the game they showed another angle that is magnified and it clearly showed his hand touching the ball... Why wasn't that angle shown during the decision making!
How do we have ultra‑HD broadcasts, yet VAR zooms in and suddenly it’s 144p? Feels like the VAR team skipped the 4K subscription.
!
English

Liverpool boss Arne Slot laments VAR after Benjamin Šeško’s goal 👀:
🗣️ "I think it's a touch on his hand. The curve on the ball changed, so there must have been a contact.
But it's no surprise to anyone that if there is a VAR intervention, then the decision goes against us. It's happened to us all season."

English
123taafe retweetledi

Worse first season than Antony and cost about £40m more 👍
Match of the Day@BBCMOTD
'I had to keep believing at one point it would click' 💪 Florian Wirtz admits his start to life at Liverpool "wasn't easy."
English
123taafe retweetledi

@justinw86618454 @AdamJoseph Try a new sport pal you dont understand football.
English

@AdamJoseph Well he wouldn’t would he because he didn’t touch him dickhead
English

If Arne Slot wants to complain about the Benjamin Sesko goal & wanted it overturned, go ahead. I'd have been ok with that, want to know why?
Because then Curtis Jones would have been sent off under DOGSO for pulling back Sesko & preventing him from scoring with the original chance.
VAR would have to review the entire attacking phase in the build up, which is standard protocol when disallowing a goal. It would have come under scrutiny as a missed foul in the build-up.
Sesko's goal (which never had enough clear evidence to overturn anyway) was a better outcome for Liverpool than a DOGSO red card & penalty, for which Bruno Fernandes has a 85% success rate of scoring.
Likely 2-0 down with 10 men sounds a lot worse than 2-0 down with 11. The bigger missed decision was Jones, not Sesko. Know when you've been outplayed, don't make excuses & try to claim being hard done by.
Sky Sports News@SkySportsNews
"Not a surprise a decision goes against us" 🗣️ Arne Slot reacts to the decision to award Benjamin Sesko's goal in Manchester United's 3-2 win over Liverpool 🔴
English
123taafe retweetledi
123taafe retweetledi
123taafe retweetledi

@john50taxi @mufcytp And you kept konate and we didnt get a penalty for what was a red card foul in the box. Same outcome either way.
English

@mufcytp You got a goal that broke the rules of the game ,and he kept Bruno on the pitch .
English
123taafe retweetledi

@GooalMouth I thought a foul in the box stopping a goalscoring opportunity was a red and penalty but you not mentioning that ?
English

When did they change the rules for this then? I thought hand ball that leads to a goal means no goal?
The xG Philosophy@xGPhilosophy
1.00(xHandball)
English



















