name
6.1K posts


@1xBet_Eng If Messi lifts the cup 10,000 promo? For me of course
Argentina win penalty kicks 3-2
English

@ConnCFC It was at the nick of the moment, Kante/Caicedo/Ramires have done it a thousand times. Not a yellow in my eyes
English

FURIA with a head scratcher here for sure.
3/5 players from their kickoff regional win are now benched after one bad stage playing out of identity
thomas@AkamaruVal
Furia will be replacing eeiu with c0m ahead of their 2nd game in Stage Two. Eeiu helped Furia qualify for their first international in the franchising era at the start of this year.
English

@SafaricomPLC Mimi ata hajawahi nipandishia?
Ni dm number you confirm my transactions warrant a higher limit?
English
name retweetledi
name retweetledi
name retweetledi
name retweetledi
name retweetledi
name retweetledi
name retweetledi

chess changed his life
Dexerto@Dexerto
Jynxzi has been awarded Man of the Match with an 8.8 FotMob rating
English
name retweetledi

Has Bitcoin's biggest mystery been solved?
The New York Times just posted a loooong piece linking crypto OG Adam Back to the elusive Satoshi Nakamoto.
The main evidence the Times puts forward is a series of posts between 1997 and 1999 that lay out every core feature of Bitcoin, from built-in scarcity to a publicly verifiable protocol.
To tie the writing to Back, the Times used forensic linguistics, running 34,000 of the posts through writing quirk filters to narrow down a pool of 620 candidates to just 1.
Adam Back.
Times reporter John Carreyrou confronted Back at a crypto forum asking him to explain other so-called coincidences like why he conveniently went silent on cryptography forums the entire time Satoshi was active, or why he refused to hand over the metadata on emails that would clear his name.
Back offered up no real explanations.
The final smoking gun Carreyrou puts forth is that Back is about to become CEO of a publicly traded Bitcoin treasury company, which means if he is Satoshi, that billions in bitcoin controlled by Satoshi's wallet becomes a legally material disclosure he's required to tell shareholders about.
It all sounds pretty good...except for one small wrinkle.
Back himself was quick to shut it down.
He called the case "confirmation bias" saying similarities in writing and timing are just coincidence.
Some in crypto don't even want the answer.
For Bitcoin believers, keeping Satoshi anonymous is its ultimate feature, not a bug.
According to Back himself, "I think it is good for bitcoin."

English
name retweetledi






















