家庭連合一世おじさん信者

"7,000+ Rally Against Religious Corporation Dissolution Bill as Concerns Over 'Religious Freedom Violations' Spread" 7,000 Protestant clergy and believers gathered outside the National Assembly on April 1. They came to demand withdrawal of a civil law amendment that would allow the government to dissolve religious organizations and seize their assets. The bill was framed as targeting groups like the Unification Church and Shincheonji. Mainstream Protestant leaders rejected that framing. The rally's closing statement made the case directly: "It is packaged as a Unification Church and Shincheonji prevention law. In practice, it could apply to all religious organizations." The specific provisions drawing alarm: ･ Warrantless investigations and oversight of religious bodies ･ Mandatory government seizure of assets upon dissolution ･ Vague, undefined criteria for determining "political interference" Pastor Kim Un-seong of Youngnak Church called it "a dangerous starting point that could eventually cover all of society." Pastor Lee Tae-hee pointed to China: "China started with institutional management and developed into a structure that restricts even doctrine and sermons. This law could become the starting line for that kind of control." Pastor Son Hyun-bo framed it as a constitutional violation: "The principle of separation of church and state means the state must not interfere in religion. This bill reverses that." PPP lawmaker Cho Bae-suk attended the rally and stated the bill "poses a significant risk of infringing on religious freedom and property rights." Organizers are calling on Catholic and Buddhist communities to join the opposition. Protests will continue until the bill is withdrawn. The bill targets religious groups the government dislikes. Its critics say it will not stop there. Source: m.news.nate.com/view/20260401n…

BREAKING: Korean Pastors Rally Against Dissolution Bill. Condensed translation: Approximately 7,000 Protestant pastors and believers gathered in front of the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, to oppose the proposed Religious Corporation Dissolution Law, calling for its withdrawal over concerns it could infringe on religious freedom and property rights. Participants held placards and chanted slogans opposing forced dissolution of religious groups, arguing the bill could enable state overreach and apply broadly to all religious organizations, not just specific groups. Lawmakers, including Representative Cho Bae-sook, attended in support. She stated: “Laws must not violate the Constitution and must align with universal values. This bill has a high potential to infringe on religious freedom and property rights.” Religious leaders warned that the law could expand beyond religion into wider societal control. Kim Woon-sung said: “This amendment may appear like a small seed now, but it could become a dangerous starting point that eventually covers all of society. Issues related to so-called heretical groups like Shincheonji or the Unification Church are spiritual matters that the church itself should handle—they are not matters for state power to resolve through law.” He added: “A law must have not only legality but also legitimacy. A law lacking legitimacy can lead to another historical tragedy.” Lee Tae-hee warned: “State control over religion gradually intensifies and eventually extends to controlling the content of faith itself. In China, it began with institutional management but developed into a system that restricts doctrine and sermons.” He added: “This Religious Corporation Dissolution Law could become the starting point of such control.” Speakers cited international examples, noting that religious regulation in countries such as Germany, China, and Russia has been used for political control, causing harm. Son Hyun-bo stated: “The principle of separation of church and state means the state should not interfere in religion, yet this law reverses that principle.” He warned: “If this law is passed, it could lead to an abuse of state power—dissolving churches and confiscating their assets.” He emphasized: “Religious freedom is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution.” Speakers also referenced the historical role of religious leaders in the March 1st Independence Movement, framing opposition to the bill as a national responsibility. In a closing statement, Pastor Choi Kang-hee described the bill as: “An unconstitutional piece of legislation that infringes on the religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution.” Key concerns included warrantless investigations, asset confiscation upon dissolution, and vague standards for determining political involvement. The statement concluded: “Although this bill is presented as a measure to prevent groups like the Unification Church and Shincheonji, it is in fact a comprehensive regulation that could apply to all religious organizations. It represents an attempt to turn religion into an object of administrative control.” It warned: “If the bill is not withdrawn, opposition movements led by Korean churches will spread like wildfire. Other religious communities, including Catholicism and Buddhism, as well as civil society, must also join in solidarity.” Organizers stated they will continue rallies and coordinated action until the bill is withdrawn. m.news.nate.com/view/20260401n…

個人としては 高裁判決後、初めての遊説を行いました！ 雨の中ではありましたが、信教二世の声が渋谷に響き渡りました！ そして、今回は、なんと！！！ NHKの取材も入り、撮影していただきました！ どのように放送していただけるかは分かりませんが、少しでも信教二世の声が届くことを願っています。

【朗報】AI翻訳で世界にバレる…日本の「信教の自由」崩壊がアメリカに届く日　 舞台が整い、新しい道がつくられた！　 閉ざされた礼拝堂より強かった“本物の信仰” youtu.be/ULwZiGyAAQY

最近、Xでのコミュニケーションを通して、「ああ、われわれは言っていることとやっていることが一致していなかったから、世の中から嫌われ、最終的に解散命令を受けるようになっちゃったんだな」と思わされたので、少し語ってみた。 youtu.be/vHWxFZpRebo

いやさぁ、保守にとってもリベラルにとっても共産党ってのは日本の敵じゃん。統一教会、勝共連合、世界平和統一家庭連合はずーっと、共産党にとっては目の上のタンコブだったんだよ。その時点で反日勢力ではないって解るでしょ？共産主義の台頭から俺達を護ってくれてた、敬意を払うべき存在なんだよ。

Most people assume anyone can nominate someone for the Nobel Peace Prize. Here is the truth. They can't. The Norwegian Nobel Committee only accepts nominations from a narrow list of qualified individuals: • Members of national assemblies and governments of sovereign states • Members of the International Court of Justice • University professors in history, law, philosophy, theology, and social sciences • Directors of peace research and foreign policy institutes • Past Nobel Peace Prize laureates • Former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee Tens of thousands of people worldwide qualify. Most of the world's population does not. The person who nominated Dr. Hak Ja Han for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize is Dr. Jan Figel. He is not a random political figure. Dr. Figel served as the European Union's first-ever Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief outside the EU, a position created in 2016 at the request of the European Parliament. He is also a former European Commissioner for Education, Training, Culture and Youth, and former Deputy Prime Minister of Slovakia. As EU Special Envoy, Figel helped secure the freedom of 25 individuals persecuted for their religion across Pakistan, Sudan, Iran, and Cuba, including a central role in the Asia Bibi case, a Catholic woman facing execution in Pakistan for blasphemy. He is currently the interim president of FOREF Europe, the Forum for Religious Freedom Europe, and a co-chair of the IRF Roundtable in Washington, D.C. Figel cited Dr. Han's decades of interfaith dialogue, humanitarian cooperation, Korean Peninsula peacebuilding, and family values advocacy as the basis for his nomination. This is what a credentialed, independent religious freedom nomination looks like. The nominator has spent his career freeing people from death rows and confronting authoritarian regimes in defense of conscience. When someone with that record submits your name, it is not a publicity move. It is a professional judgment.

大本教の弾圧を支持する人は現代ではほとんどいないだろう。世界連合の解散命令を支持する世論は後世どのように見られるか考えてみたらどうだろう。

米州人権委「信教の自由と法人格は不可分」　 人権侵害への深い反省　アルゼンチン、軍政下でエホバの証人弾圧 worldtimes.co.jp/global/2026040… 特別抗告が却下された場合、先進民主主義国家の日本の法理と判例が、アジア全域の信教の自由を巡る前例となることを忘れてはならない。

𝕏の翻訳機能が蛸壺化した言論を激しく揺さぶっている。討論からも事実からも逃げ続ける人たちの卑怯さがあからさまになる時代だ。 月刊『正論』５月号本日発売。 二つの視点。すべて事実ベース。５倍濃縮くらいの対談です。

The Tokyo High Court Unification Church Decision 5. Violating International Law bitterwinter.org/the-tokyo-high… Restricting freedom of religion or belief on the grounds of “social acceptability” & “public welfare” is prohibited by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

スロバキア交通相やEU（欧州連合）の委員を務めたヤン・フィゲル氏が、今年のノーベル平和賞候補として旧統一教会トップの韓鶴子総裁を推薦した。このことについて所感を述べてみた。泥臭い戦略にワクワクしている。 youtu.be/387pCYiLzDA

月刊『正論』５月号（４月１日発売）──法の支配が終わる日 東京高裁決定の衝撃 対談。ほんの一部ですが紹介します。同決定の問題は多岐に渡り、一宗教法人にとどまらない影響を与えることが必至です。法だけでなく実態との乖離など語り尽くしました。 ぜひ、お読みください。明日は我が身。

紀藤正樹氏、公開討論から逃げるのか？ 小川榮太郎が突きつけた“封印された論点” 拉致監禁・強制脱会・ダブルスタンダード…家庭連合をめぐる議論を、今こそ白日の下にyoutu.be/f6OsZjToaj4

The Tokyo High Court decision dissolving the Unification Church claims it does not violate international law. But it does bitterwinter.org/the-tokyo-high…

日本語で適当に呟いた一言が 世界に翻訳されるらしい じゃあ聞いてみたい 日本では 刑事事件ゼロの団体が解散させられそうになってて 刑事事件バリバリの団体は普通に存在してる このダブスタ、どう思う？

ここにも家庭連合にご理解のある方がいらっしゃいましたよ😊 嬉しいですね💡

毎日新聞（2026/3/31）では、東京高裁での家庭連合解散命令が「妥当である」81％、「妥当でない」4％、「分からない」14％との調査結果を発表した。昨年の地裁判決後の調査よりも「妥当である」は3％減った。世論は少しずつだが変化している。 youtu.be/IGZCh7kYwOQ

@shibanuma1920 ご活躍、期待しています！

#新しいプロフィール画像

宗教自由巡り日本を懸念　 旧統一教会解散　日米関係に影響も worldtimes.co.jp/global/2026033… ＜元駐ルクセンブルク米国大使　ランディー・エバンス氏＞ エバンス氏は世界平和統一家庭連合への解散命令について「間違いなく懸念を呼ぶ動きであり、日本政府が米国との関係構築を進める上で妨げとなる可能性が高い」と述べ、トランプ政権がこの問題を注視しているとの認識を示した。