Sabitlenmiş Tweet
1CA VIBE📺
279 posts
1CA VIBE📺
@1cavibe
1CA & Infinite Narrative 💻 website is live.
Katılım Ocak 2026
160 Takip Edilen65 Takipçiler
@EjikoJudah44029 Thought I already followed you back lol, my bad just did it
English
@daumenxyz Structurally, it becomes a platform that kills off all retail participants and extracts fees from them indefinitely.
English
It's time I finally say my take on this PVP situation.
What we're witnessing in recent weeks is total ignorance from current market participants, and let me be clear on what this means.
> You should trench, sell, stack profits, rinse low caps, sure. I'm fine with that; I do it as well.
> You should also be aware that current conditions and participants are VERY DIFFERENT from the ones 6 months ago:
1) The main characters of today - and I love most of these guys - dominate the low cap space. And this means, the more tokens appear there, the more they make. The more they make, the bigger they get. The bigger they get, the more the scalping mindset spreads.
2) So, the goal becomes: how can I keep increasing activity in this market cap range? I vamp it with a new logo, with a new name, with a new fee split structure; on a new launchpad; with the owner onboard, etc. How do I get away with it? I blame it on Pump.
-- And let me interrupt here to mention that I vamped tokens with these assumptions as well; I'm no saint. I am just educated enough to understand the underlying reasons --
And if you are questioning whether I am right or wrong, I will give you 2 prime examples:
1) I saw a 60k follower account, two days ago, posting how Pump made the Mayhem bot to extract 8M from the trenches. This is the same as saying that Pump made a technology that no one else in the world could do: a self-trading bot that made 8M in profit (lmao). Sure, on top of it being a billion dollar revenue company (they really need 8M).
2) Old bagworking KOLs dming me (yesterday) to take initials on generational coins like $Punch or $TripleT . Guys who used to bagwork with me now call it a W at 3-4M. -> this is a bottom signal btw.
Why is this important?
You cannot mimic top trenchers. You can make money trenching, sure. But you cannot mimic them. You gotta understand that trenching is the same as playing a game. Just because you like Call of Duty, doesn't mean you can play ranked or you'll be good at it. that
So, 99% of the people who view these streams, they will lose. And because they don't understand/cannot see it's a lack of skill, they will spread whatever reason current participants feed them; in this case, "f*ck these launchpads". And they'll go back to vamping it and making sure they can deploy as many versions of this as possible.
Where do we go from here?
These people who joined, they've never seen 7-fig pnls. The only one they've seen is prob Remus, who, by the way, decided to FUD current runners recently for some reason. But that gave a glimpse of hope.
And this is understandable, SOL at 80-90, biggest narrative worldwide at 12M.
I understand you. But please stay educated. Stay humble. You've got to understand that we're not in a full-on bull market. But these huge runners will NEVER leave us. I don't care what game you play (sizing, trenching, whatever), as long as you remain educated.
Oh, and by the way, 99% of the suggestions like "block these tokens from being deployed", they CANNOT be implemented. Legit, tech-wise, it CANNOT be done on the SOL blockchain. Please educate yourselves.
Shoutout to both trenchers and size players that play their game without fudding or spreading fake narras. I recently came across this very good trencher @redemptionjizzy , who absolutely dominates the trenches, but somehow is sizing amazing memes like $Punch and $TripleT , and keeping the dream alive. I also try to do both, whenever I can.
Man, I've been going for too long.
Stay humble.
json@json1444
PVP has been a massive point of contention over the past few days, and many plead for a fix from the launchpad layer. however, I believe the causation of PVP is misguided and isn’t the result of the launchpad, but a result of: 1) broader liquidity leaving the market 2) behavioral problems it’s no secret that we’re in a bear market & more liquidity has left the market than has entered over the past 6 months, hence why ceilings are much lower & opportunity feels scarce with lower liquidity & lower ceilings comes the desire to find edge elsewhere. if traders know they’re not going to succeed holding, and they can't beat other traders, there may be edge in redeploying an already successful coin; whether it’s under the guise of a better ticker, image, has tracked wallets, fee distributions, etc. while I think this behavior is incredibly destructive, I believe it is a permanent pendulum, and I believe we're currently at the extreme end of that pendulum, which is why we’re experiencing incessant & unrelenting PVP compared to what we see in a bull market (PVP exists, but faces nowhere near the level of participation as we see now)
English
English
PVP has been a massive point of contention over the past few days, and many plead for a fix from the launchpad layer. however, I believe the causation of PVP is misguided and isn’t the result of the launchpad, but a result of:
1) broader liquidity leaving the market
2) behavioral problems
it’s no secret that we’re in a bear market & more liquidity has left the market than has entered over the past 6 months, hence why ceilings are much lower & opportunity feels scarce
with lower liquidity & lower ceilings comes the desire to find edge elsewhere. if traders know they’re not going to succeed holding, and they can't beat other traders, there may be edge in redeploying an already successful coin; whether it’s under the guise of a better ticker, image, has tracked wallets, fee distributions, etc.
while I think this behavior is incredibly destructive, I believe it is a permanent pendulum, and I believe we're currently at the extreme end of that pendulum, which is why we’re experiencing incessant & unrelenting PVP compared to what we see in a bull market (PVP exists, but faces nowhere near the level of participation as we see now)
English
