upupandaway

@tonymoontanalfg @jhuntermav @RealChrisFarral

@jhuntermav $NO chart, only vibes @RealChrisFarral

I must say people say the government is lying and ufo's are made up.BUT WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE ME. I'M NOT CRAZY A DRUNK I GO TO WORK EVERYDAY. BUT THE "THINGS" I'VE SEEN WELL CAME UPON ME. SHOOK MY VERY THOUGHT OF WHAT REALITY REALLY IS. #ufotwitter WE ARE PROOF ALSO.

@1911Moose @atlasofmystery Forget them some of us LIKE ME im no cook no tin foil hat drunk and I have had SOME experiences that I wake up everyday having to deal with. What about US u cant say the millions of US are liars. My family knows I had these interactions and they all believe me.

@atlasofmystery That’s the problem, look who Cuomo is talking to and getting his info from. Known lairs and grifters

If Non-Human Biologics Were Recovered, Why Is the Public Still Learning About It Through TV Segments? *UAP / Disclosure In this NewsNation segment, Chris Cuomo speaks with former Pentagon UAP investigator and whistleblower Lou Elizondo, along with investigative journalist Ross Coulthart, about David Grusch’s claims involving recovered non-human technology, biologics, and alleged UAP retrieval programs. The segment begins with Cuomo asking a very direct question: is Grusch saying that this is not only about technology, but also about organic non-human or extraterrestrial beings that the U.S. government is aware of? Lou Elizondo responds by saying that what we may be witnessing is the “disintegration” of what he describes as perhaps the greatest cover-up in American history. He references David Grusch’s prior statements and testimony, and says that Grusch had access to legitimate information through his work in the national security environment. Elizondo also states that he personally worked with Grusch and that the information Grusch had access to was serious. Ross Coulthart then expands on the point by discussing Grusch’s references to “biologics,” “beings,” and different types of advanced intelligent beings. Coulthart frames this as a major escalation in the UAP discussion because the topic is no longer limited to unknown craft, advanced propulsion, or anomalous objects in military airspace. The conversation is now openly touching on the possibility of recovered biological evidence associated with non-human intelligence. That is what makes this segment significant. For many years, the mainstream UAP debate was usually kept within safer boundaries: unidentified objects, sensor data, flight safety, national security, pilot encounters, balloons, drones, foreign adversaries, or advanced aerospace platforms. But this discussion moves into much more direct language. It involves recovered technology, recovered biologics, advanced intelligences, and alleged secrecy around crash retrieval and reverse-engineering programs. Cuomo’s reaction is also worth noting. He essentially says that if this is true, then it is not just another national security issue. It would be the biggest headline of our lifetime. His point is simple: if there is life beyond Earth, or if the U.S. government possesses biological evidence connected to non-human intelligence, that would overshadow almost every other part of the story. Coulthart also brings up another important angle: foreign intelligence. He suggests that one of the most concerning aspects of Grusch’s claims involves the possibility that foreign adversaries, particularly China or Russia, may have intelligence about U.S. retrieval and reverse-engineering programs. If that is accurate, then the issue becomes more than a question of “aliens” or public curiosity. It becomes a question of secrecy, oversight, compartmentalization, and whether adversarial governments may know more about these alleged programs than the American public, most of the military, and possibly even parts of the U.S. government itself. The segment also touches on a stranger and more speculative part of the UAP subject: orb-like or plasma-like phenomena. Cuomo asks Elizondo about the “plasma” idea mentioned in the discussion. Elizondo explains that some anomalous objects, reportedly observed since the 1940s and later in restricted military airspace, have led some people to speculate that certain phenomena may display behavior that appears responsive or intelligent. He also makes clear that this was not his main focus when he was involved in the program, since his focus was more on physical crash retrieval cases. This part of the conversation is especially unusual because it expands the UAP topic beyond the standard “nuts and bolts” craft discussion. It raises the possibility that some reported phenomena may not fit neatly into ordinary categories like drones, aircraft, balloons, satellites, or conventional plasma effects. Whether that interpretation is correct is a separate question, but it shows how broad the modern UAP discussion has become. To be clear, this segment does not prove the claims. The public has still not seen the alleged recovered craft, biological material, complete classified records, chain of custody documentation, or physical evidence that would settle the matter. But the segment is still important because it shows how openly these claims are now being discussed in mainstream media by people who have been closely connected to the UAP issue. The conversation is no longer only about whether pilots saw strange objects in the sky. It is now about whether hidden retrieval programs exist, whether recovered material exists, whether biological evidence has been found, whether foreign intelligence services know about these alleged programs, and whether Congress has been kept in the dark. If Grusch’s claims are accurate, this would be a historic matter. If they are wrong, misunderstood, exaggerated, or based on incomplete information, then the public still deserves clarity. Either way, the issue should not remain trapped in a permanent gray zone. At minimum, this segment shows why the UAP topic continues to demand serious public scrutiny. The claims being discussed are too consequential to ignore, too significant to treat as entertainment, and too unresolved to accept without evidence. The next step should be more direct congressional oversight, stronger whistleblower protections, testimony from first-hand witnesses, and the release of verifiable records wherever possible. If recovered non-human technology or biologics exist, the public should not be left trying to understand the subject through short television segments and carefully worded interviews. And if they do not exist, then the public deserves to know why claims of this magnitude reached Congress and mainstream media in the first place. Either way, this discussion has moved far beyond the old stereotype of “little green men.” It is now a serious question involving government transparency, national security, science, and public trust.

@atlasofmystery Uhhh because they want to keep it a secret

@theblackvault @AKollsmith I second that. I've disagreed with you sometimes. But u stick to the facts and you do help .

@AKollsmith I appreciate that, thank you :)

Yesterday, David Grusch mentioned a formerly classified 1971 Australian secret assessment by the nuclear branch chief of the Australian government discussing the U.S. coverup of UFOs. This is a thread of that document that has been available on The Black Vault for a decade+.

@theblackvault Good read. The government is full of shit THEY'RE LYING.

**Just in** Lue Elizondo on UFO's: "We are witnessing the greatest cover up in American history" 👽🛸 "I worked with David Grusch at Space Force & I know the things he saw are legitimate" "The government has been lying to us"

@badattrading_ hey can you check $NO thanks

@TrumpDailyPosts @EricLDaugh DAMNNN FINALLY

🚨Trump just said he is "done" trying to be nice with the mullahs. Trump just said Iran took too long to make a deal and now they’re going to "PAY THE PRICE"! The bully of the Middle East is finished🔥 HT @EricLDaugh

🚨Its not illegal to defend yourself w/ deadly force in America.

@semitic_jew FACTS. I WISH PEOPLE WOULD STFU. ESPECIALLY COON ASS NIGGUHHS. IT WAS CLEARLY SELF DEFENSE. WHITE BOYS WAS BEING TOUGH AND GOT STUCK. THEY COULD'VE WENT AND GOT A COACH FUCKING SECURITY OR SOMEBODY AND HAD HIM MOVED. BUTT/ NOOO THEY HAD TO BE TOUGH GUYS 🤷🏿

@timburchett Sooo you get beat up huh. -maaaan u crazy. This is texas OPEN CARRY i will shoot anyone who threatens me damn sure if they touch me ...its called assault and SELF DEFENSE

Start out with “don’t stab anyone.”

@the_jefferymead Coon ass nigguhhsss always around nothing new.

This is about the narrative, not simply truly about black people. He ignores the 22 black people per day murdered by other black people but has all the words when black people have issues with other races. He is putting his energy towards the wrong things.

@ANTHONYBLOGAN Exactly

The Karmelo Anthony verdict of guilty in his murder case was a gross miscarriage of justice. Even if you don't agree with what Karmelo did, it does not reach to the level of murder under the law.

@Breaking911 ABOUT TIME.....FUCK IRAN

TRUMP: We're gonna be attacking Iran, and attacking them very hard. REPORTER: Resuming bombing? TRUMP: Yeah. We are.

@iAnonPatriot 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡 WAKING UP FOR AN ASS WHOOPING. YALL BEST TO GO BACK TO SLEEP IF THAT'S THE CASE 🤡

WHITE PEOPLE ARE FINALLY WAKING UP.

Its funny these white people lay dormant sit in your face like they're good ole Christians. But I see them evil slavery genes are still lingering in them because. I've seen they should hang karmelo to he got off getting 35 years for SELF DEFENSE.

@PulmonaryRunner @AngelinaReagan7 🤡

It is definitely privileged and entitlement as he should have gotten 70 years of prison at 35 years be eligible for parole if met certain conditions and standards. He should get the death penalty but at least long enough sentence that halfway point having a regular reasonable life after parole would be difficult.

35 years is BLACK PRIVILEGE.

@JonShadwellX @AngelinaReagan7 Yall white people still have thst evil slavery DNA gene in yall thst pokes its head when it wants too I see

@AngelinaReagan7 100%. Especially considering he has the possibility of parole in just 17 years for MURDER. Insanity.