Stonks 🌐

10.2K posts

Stonks 🌐

Stonks 🌐

@1nf0SeC

Not a professional stock trader but here to learn. All opinions and thoughts are my own.

Antartica Katılım Şubat 2017
464 Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$USO Calls are the way to go ;)
English
1
0
1
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
@Xizeyh Because the ones with the $1 requirement need to request for an extension.
English
1
0
3
0
Xizeyh
Xizeyh@Xizeyh·
@1nf0SeC A company is not eligible to follow the procedures outlined in Paras. 802.02 and 802.03 with respect to this criteria. If you read Paras. 802.02 and 0.3, there it says that companies have 18 months, but thus not with the 1.00 dollar requirement
English
1
0
0
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS First off people are uneducated but I'll say this. Any US listed stock on the NYSE and NASDAQ are given extensions and have an appeal process for staying listed in the event that the multiple extensions a company requests leads to a delist or downgrade to OTC Markets.
Xizeyh@Xizeyh

@1nf0SeC $SOS Can you verify the fact that on the NYSE, companies that trade under 1 dollar only have 6 months to regain compliance without additional extensions?

English
5
2
6
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS Also small reminder, until we see BDL update its site about the WI plant being online, to me it is not operational until they post a article stating so.
English
1
1
6
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS So much going on in China for SOS in regards to the entities they have opened but little to no update in the US. The BDLCyber websites both CN and EN sites have had no content updates to both sites ever since the 2-25 filing made by SOS.
English
3
2
15
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
@Xizeyh Their is nothing they can do unless China decides to allow foreign investment in which they would just list their main entity in China on the exchange and would no longer need the offshore shell
English
1
0
0
0
Xizeyh
Xizeyh@Xizeyh·
@1nf0SeC And what would the solution be for SOS to escape this chokehold?
English
1
0
0
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS 1/? Let me explain, the reason why we don't get PR for Mainland activity is solely because of the loophole. Chinese companies who are publicly listed report their Chinese entities to Beijing as having no foreign investors since Chinese law prevents foreign investment.
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC

$SOS New entity that SOS opened up in China called Che Xiaoer Technology Co. Ltd. In December 2021. SOS Auto Service, Qingdao SOS Investment Partnership, Wang Yilin, Jie Weizhao and a Mr. Guo Gang are investors. The Executive Director is Mr. Wang Bin and the Manager is Wang Chen.

English
3
0
9
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS 3/? If a Chinese company is listed using the VIE loophole and they start pushing PR about Mainland activity, legally, it's a problem. Why? Because Beijing will see that these companies are reporting that all investors of their mainland co.'s are Chinese when that is not true
English
1
0
4
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS 2/? Hence, the birth of the Sina Loophole which uses a shell to allow Chinese companies to bypass China law on foreign investments. Now, the reason why we lack PR is solely due to legal reasons.
English
1
0
3
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS New entity that SOS opened up in China called Che Xiaoer Technology Co. Ltd. In December 2021. SOS Auto Service, Qingdao SOS Investment Partnership, Wang Yilin, Jie Weizhao and a Mr. Guo Gang are investors. The Executive Director is Mr. Wang Bin and the Manager is Wang Chen.
English
3
0
19
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS Regarding the securities class action, these cases usually take about 2-3 years to conclude. In such cases you're looking at three scenarios, the company will either settle which may most likely be the case, a judgement or even a dismissal (this can happen at any point.)
English
1
0
8
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS I'll also forgot to say but a combo play includes the SEC here too. If let's say the SEC concludes no wrongdoing was found the stock will most likely go up. Hence, it's important to understand the price of $BTC, the validity of the lawsuit with how far it's come, and the SEC
English
0
0
7
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS Good question. Well here's the thing such plays now go from being a Primary Play which is BTC focused to now being a combo play by this I mean it's now a lawsuit + BTC play. If SOS wins the case against Beltran then this stock will pop but again you have to measure risk here
English
1
0
5
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
@wallstreetdrip $SOS Yes they mentioned the Kimberly Beltran lawsuit in the first paragraph of this filing.
English
0
0
1
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS I have no clue how I missed the 6-K on February 25th but apparently SOS has disclosed that the SEC has subpoenaed the company on Feb. 16th.
Stonks 🌐 tweet media
English
6
1
10
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$cei Damn baby look at CEI go! 💥
English
1
0
5
0
Stonks 🌐
Stonks 🌐@1nf0SeC·
$SOS Citadel Advisors aka the same Shitadel that shorts stocks like $AMC have sold all their shares. They still own calls and puts. This occurred on February 14 of this year.
English
2
3
34
0