Aaron Chand 22

@HollyGrayle India was already a wealthy country when Australia 1st fleet arrived in 1788 India GDP was 23% of world GDP

Had Indians sent their prisoners to Australia, and then Indian settlers gone to Australia, Australia would be just like India. People replicate their own culture and conditions, and Australia became a First World country in less than 200 years precisely because only very specific types of migrants were allowed in - in fact, migration from everywhere but Europe and Britain was all but banned entirely up until about 1971. Migration from South East and East Asia has largely been successful, but as soon as the Browns could get their cloven hooves through the door, they came as fast as they could. Smaller numbers integrated pretty well because they had no choice, but then they started coming in droves, and it became quite clear that their own countries were such horrible places precisely because there were so many of them in it. Fast forward to the early 00's, and that was the beginning of the end of Australia's success story. Successive governments stopped bothering with innovation, and their only concern was GDP growth. And because it's much easier to increase GDP by importing infinity Deliveroonians rather than increase GDP per capita, that's the road they took. And now we have ethnic enclaves like Parramatta and Harris Park (Indian), and Lakemba and Bankstown (feral Arabs), Blacktown (full of Sudanese and similarly world-destroying Third Worlders). They all love a good rape, hate paying taxes, find any and every available opportunity to scam taxpayers, and all have strong clannish cultures. Add to that the housing crisis (there's literally not enough houses to house these Bomalians), crimes and practices we've never had to deal with before (forced marriages, terrorism, FGM, incestuous marriages and deformed children, drive-by shootings, racially motivated gang rapes, etc), and stagnant wage growth, and yeah - the country is in major decline. And it all started happening in the last 25 years or so, when very very different migrants started turning up in large numbers and, to my original point, began to replicate their culture just as Britons did, but with vastly different outcomes. The fact is: not all cultures are equal, and each culture is only ever capable of replicating ITSELF - never someone else's. There will always be people who want to flee what their culture produces, but they will only ever bring that dysfunction with them because they ARE the dysfuntion. Australia is the greatest example of British brilliance - even the WORST Britons will still produce an exemplary country. And even the BEST Third Worlder will never be able to even maintain it, much less build upon it; all they are capable of is what they have always done - destroy. The Third World isn't a place - it's a mindset. And nowhere is that made SO apparent than Australia.

@RealJarTaylor Pioneers that for some reason had 2% of world GDP while India and China in the 17th 18th centurys had 33% to India 25% of the world's industrial output Bengal that tiny province of Mughal Muslim ruled India had 12% GDP higher than all of Western Europe combined

Baloney. My ancestors were PIONEERS. They built the country immigrants came to.

@Nina7Infinity @DanielLMcAdams A Persian King is different from an English king Geroge the 3rd

@DanielLMcAdams Is it irony that they are having Leftist "No Kings" protests in Boston while a Puppet King is being uplifted by Right wing Americans to be a leader of Iran? We live in a bizarro world. 🤡🌎

Deport this freak.

@VladTheInflator America was a English settlement colony they didn't like other white people who not of English heritage Ben Franklin famous talked about Germans being too numerous and said they aren't used to liberty in PA. America wasn't a welcome Hotel for all white people

@ScubertDubert70 @estherzelda0514 He got lost trying to find India he stupidly thought the Carribean islands was close to Japan and China

@estherzelda0514 Yes because judging people's actions from 500+ years ago through the lens of 2026 progressive values is a very good and smart thing to do and helps with historical analysis. Your tumblr community is very proud of you today

Christopher Columbus was so infamously cruel that the Spanish crown paid to send someone to Hispaniola in 1500 to investigate. This resulted in a 48-page report detailing the testimony of two dozen witnesses, and the investigator himself, of how Columbus had mismanaged the colony, cut off ears and noses, tortured colonists that questioned his authority, paraded women naked, and sold natives into slavery. He was arrested, tried, and stripped of his titles. Some people that witnessed his barbarism, who had initially supported and participated in his colonization efforts, became so disgusted by Columbus's behavior that they also published accounts of his atrocities and began advocating for the rights of Indigenous populations. In particular, a contemporaneous Pope, and many other lesser Catholic figures, condemned Columbus explicitly, viewing his behaviors as grave offenses against G-d. Matt, you are literally more of a cretin than people that died before 1600 BCE. I wouldn't call you a conservative, I would call you a barbarian.

@AnnCoulter How is Iran a 3rd world culture have you studied world history the Persians are one of the world's great civilizations. Pre 1979 they where on its way to becoming a modern westernized secular state and would be like South Korea Taiwan and Japan had Revlotion didnt happen.

What on earth does Trump think we've "rescued" Europe from under NATO? He said that over and over again, to claim they owe us. From 3rd world savages invading, desecrating their cultures and raping their women? Because if so, we didn't rescue them from squat.

> 70 years ago, Iran looked just like any Western country. > Short skirts, rock’n’roll, open universities. > It’s 1953. Iran elects a secular socialist: Mohammad Mossadegh. > He nationalizes oil. That pisses off BP. > Cold War excuse. > CIA and MI6 stage a coup. Operation Ajax. > Mossadegh is overthrown. > They install the Shah, a brutal US-backed dictator. > Secret police. Torture chambers. > Iran turns into a puppet state. > People are that desperate, they turn to Khomeini, an exiled cleric, promising independence and dignity. > 1979: Islamic Revolution. > The Shah flees. > US embassy stormed. Hostage crisis. > America never forgives. > Arms Saddam Hussein. > Iraq invades Iran. > US provides chemical weapons, satellite intel, logistics. > 1 million Iranians die. > Iranian kids sent into minefields with plastic keys around their necks. > US shoots down Iran Air Flight 655 > 290 civilians dead. > No apology. > Fast forward today, Israel attacks Iran. > The U.S. immediately says “we stand with Israel.” > They talk about “regime change.” > They say that Iranians “deserve freedom.” > No mention of the coup they started. > No mention of the dictator they installed. > No mention of the war they fueled. > No mention of the decades of sanctions and sabotage. > They created the monster, and now they attacked it because it was still breathing. > Watch who they try to put on the throne next. > The son of the Shah is already being presented as the “alternative.” > The same dynasty. > The same foreign backing. >The same promises of stability. > History will repeats itself. > And it’s not gonna end well.

@kauinoa04 @Awk20000 English settlers

America was literally built by European settlers, then a second wave of European colonist/immigrants as well as slaves, and THEN other immigrants. The ‘built by immigrants’ is such an obvious historical revision that only happened after the 70s when the feminization of education and other institutions began gaining momentum.

Asmongold on America being a nation of immigrants “No we’re not..fake thing that you tell people..total bs”

@MichaelMatchone @Awk20000 It was a English setter colony by the English Brtist Empire to be accurate

@Awk20000 If the land has no government then its settlers. If the land has a government then it’s immigrants. Learn the difference! America was built by settlers!

@RealJarTaylor Don't you forget Jared that your people only had 2% of world GDP and India and China Michelle WU family are from Taiwan a Chinese settler colony. Quing Dynsty had 30% GDP India had 23% in the 18th century Bengal that one region made 12% of world GDP explain that

Don't you love the way they come to the country we built and then decide they have the right to give it away?

@RealJarTaylor And you should go back to Europe. And Jared you never answered my question that you said to Pakistani American journalist Amana Nawaz saying we Bulit a wonderful country your ancestors could not have been. Forgetting India since Pakistan was part of India was 23% in 18th CE

Fine. Indians can go back to the Stone Age. Blacks can go back to Africa. Happy now?

@beverleyturner @billieeilish Well the English colonists who came from England in the 17th century did colonize the East coast of North America and set up America the 13 Colonies USA the original 13 states

A highlight of last night's Late Show Live with @benleogbn in LA. We love a bit of mischief. 😂 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 @billieeilish and her fortified residence. It must be lovely to preach from there about being #kind to criminals on the ICE arrest- list.

@dr_duchesne @SantoshGavaskar Bengal that one region which is made up of Bangladesh and the modem Indian state of West Bengal than a united region and other regions. Made up 12% of world GDP higher than all of Western Europe combined. It was the wealthiest regions in the 18th century.

@SantoshGavaskar That Indian's GDP was 23% was a reflection of its massive population, which was likewise about 23% of the world's share. India was a backward society with no modern technologies, in 1700.

It was the British who gave Indians a sense of history, the intellectual and institutional mirror to see themselves clearly as members of the human race. They replaced guru-shishya myth-making with scholarly archives, and the disciplines of history, linguistics, archeology, and geography to study their culture and history. They built them true universities. Before the Brits arrived, India had no historiographical tradition based on proper archives, documentation and causal analysis. They had mytho-poetic chronicles where legend was confounded with fact. Thanks to the British, Indians learned about archival preservation. The Imperial Records Department (1891), established by the English, as well as provincial record rooms, preserved millions of Mughal, Maratha historical documents. Properly trained British scholars like H.H. Wilson, James Prinsep, and Max Müller deciphered inscriptions such as Ashokan edicts. It was the British who gave them scholarly periodicals and peer review journals, such as Journal of the Asiatic Society. As a result, after thousands of years, Indians learned to write their own history. The first historical books about India were written by Brits: Vincent Smith's Early History of India (1904). They trained Indians to write the first modern histories, such as R.C. Majumdar, Jadunath Sarkar, and K.A. Nilakanta Sastri. The British built Indians the first true universities, away from Madrasas and monastic centers: Calcutta, Bombay, Madras (1857) where the first to offer BA/BSc degrees, with research in sciences and humanities. In 1912, Brits produced the first Indian PhD in science. In total, by 1947, India inherited 5 modern universities from the British, in addition to many colleges. By creating Archaeological Survey of India, 1861, Indians were able to discover the Indus Valley (1924), under John Marshall. Two Indian archeologists trained by the British, Dayaram Sahni and R.D. Banerji, used British methods to excavate Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro. The British standardized Indian dialects. William Jones (1786) connected Sanskrit–Greek–Latin, leading to birth of comparative philology. Fort William College (1800) produced first Hindi/Urdu grammars. The British standardized scripts: Nagari for Hindi, Perso-Arabic for Urdu, which enabled mass printing. The Indian Civil Service exams (created by British, 1853) trained the very bureaucrats who dismantled the Raj. I will post later refuting the claim that Britain "de-industrialized" India, showing they created foundations for modern India. Image: Elphinstone College, built 1835.

@fakehistoryhunt @Z3T4theartist @brettachapman They did it Japan

@22Aaron63121 @Z3T4theartist @brettachapman So you think it was common for people to fill a tub with hot water and submerge themselves into it? Do you take a bath every day today?

The only thing Columbus discovered in 1492 was personal hygiene when a Native American named Guacanagari went on one of his dirty ships for dinner and showed him and the medieval Spaniards how to wash their hands when handling food using friction and herbs. Who were the savages?

@TheLaurenChen In the 18th century in the year 1750 India and China has a combined GDP of 60% England and America combined GDP of 2% by the 20th century it went down to 2% for India and China after independence in 1950s

People often say that the developing world is poor because the Western world colonized them and stole their resources. The truth, however, is that over the past century, the developing world has, for the most part, shown that they are completely incapable of harnessing their own resources. They are not poor because we stole from them. They are poor because they do not know how to run and administer their own countries, resources be damned. Take Venezuela. The world's largest oil reserves mean nothing if you have a corrupt communist as your leader. People will actually be starving and trying to eat zoo animals while you sit on trillions of dollars in resources! Africa is another example. Europeans left behind farmland, trains, roads, and mines in Africa. What happened to it all? It's not that all of a sudden, the Africans started running things like anti-colonialist activists had envisioned at the time. No, no. All the infrastructure fell into disrepair and/or was stripped down and looted. They were literally handed fully functioning, completed supply chains for resource extraction, and basically unlimited wealth, but they couldn't manage the simple upkeep. Now, the defense for Africa might be that "The Europeans didn't teach the Africans how to manage any of this! It's not the Africans' fault they couldn't run it independently! They were never trained!" But my brother in Christ, the Europeans DID try to train locals for management! Obviously it would have been easier to have at least some locals in administration, rather than having to import an ENTIRE workforce, but efforts to find African talent were largely unsuccessful. Don't believe me? Just look at the different outcomes in Hong Kong and Singapore when compared to Africa. In East Asia, Europeans often did work with locals in administrative and management capacities. When colonialism ended, Hong Kong and Singapore were able to manage themselves. Not the case with Africa. Now, none of this is to say that colonialism is good. People have the right to self-rule and seld-determination. However, the idea that colonialism and resources extraction are responsible for the developing world's ongoing poverty? That is quite simply a crock of shit.

@fakehistoryhunt @Z3T4theartist @brettachapman How did the Japanese manage in the 16 to 19th centurys yet Europe was so stupid dispite Colonialsm and growing power they couldn't figure out how to take a bath everyday

@22Aaron63121 @Z3T4theartist @brettachapman So you think it was common for people to fill a tub with hot water and submerge themselves into it? Because that's not really common for most countries today. Or are we talking about jumping in a lake, because that was common in Europe too.

@TheLaurenChen @BluPuppy1 You do know China had great civilization long before white English people did China didn't need the West historically. They made up 33% of world GDP in the 18th century under the Quing Dynsty. Ancient China invented gunpowder paper money Paper Tea silks porcelain. CVil service

@BluPuppy1 I am Chinese, yes. A proud product of Hong Kong. A safe, beautiful, thriving former British colony! The British left and we didn't just start ripping apart our infrastructure to sell for scraps. Funny that.

When Europe went to Africa, to be clear, they were already miles behind most of the world. Some areas didn't have written language or the wheel. You can't blame that on Europe. Under colonialism, Europeans actually brought Africa a little further ahead than it had been. They built infrastructure, including schools. They implemented modern agricultural and husbandry practices. And I won't deny that some practices of colonialism were inhumane, but you're also kidding yourself if you think pre-colonial Africa was some bastion of human rights. Case in point, many African nations now have rates of violence exponentially higher than they did under European rule. Now I'm not trying to argue colonialism was good. As I have stated, people have the right to self-determination and self-governance. My issue, however, is the attempt to blame ongoing African poverty on Europe. Pragmatically, Europe's actual influence on Africa was to make Africans safer, better educated, and less impoverished than they had been before, and in some cases, than they even are now. I know it's unpopular to say this nowadays, but you just can't blame the white man for all your problems.

@TheLaurenChen Africa had the wheel and written language it's a colonial myth Africa didn't know what the wheel was. Also the wheel was nesscry in some parts of Africa because of the terrain. Would make it useless

@fakehistoryhunt @Z3T4theartist @brettachapman Japan was one of the cleanest countries in the colonial era 16th century to 19th century even before the Meji era. Edo now Tokyo was the largest capital city bigger than London and France and cleaner. Same with other Japanese cites and towns in the 18th century

@22Aaron63121 @Z3T4theartist @brettachapman Bathing or washing? Bathing wasn't really common anywhere on earth for most of history and still isn't. Washing was. Washing daily is perfectly fine. It was common practice in Europe, still is.