@2k_115

@thehill The WH divide isn’t about tech safety. It’s about raw oligarchic power. ​Peter Thiel & JD Vance pulled the strings last-minute, forcing Trump to freeze the AI order to protect Silicon Valley’s multi-trillion CapEx bubble from regulatory threats. ​Follow the money.

Trump’s last-minute AI order switch exposes White House divides thehill.com/policy/technol…

The only thing growing faster than the artificial-intelligence industry may be Americans’ negative feelings about it. on.wsj.com/3PT6Om2

@WSJ First, you sell the corporate trash from the inside. ​Then, you switch sides and make millions mocking it. ​The AI business isn’t actually about building AI. It’s about selling shovels during a gold rush—from both sides of the counter. @WSJ

He used to be one of those corporate sales guys. Now he makes millions by mocking them. 🔗: on.wsj.com/49eHL3t

@NewsHour While mainstream media obsess over spotting deepfakes, they push the ultimate fiction: AI as an economic success. ​With ROI near zero, capital burned & massive CapEx, it’s a protected narrative. ​The real deepfake is the balance sheet. ​#AgenticAI #CapEx #ROI

Artificial intelligence-generated content is everywhere these days, making it increasingly difficult to separate fact from fiction, particularly when it comes to breaking news. Here are some tips for distinguishing AI-generated content from reality. to.pbs.org/47FCvVP

@GoldmanSachs GS predicts a 24x token explosion by 2030 thanks to agentic AI. ​Translation: keep burning CapEx, energy & GPUs—the revenue will come... eventually. ​Reality check: ROI is near zero, hardware becomes obsolete in 18 months & energy bills crush. ​Selling shovels in a gold rush.

As consumers and enterprises adopt agentic AI technology, token consumption could see a 24-fold increase by 2030, according to Goldman Sachs Research. Read more: click.gs.com/g1ht

But OpenAI’s panic IPO shows the rats are already fleeing the ship. They lose the "conspiracy" card when 2K115’s raw math hits. Now it’s just a mad dash to dump toxic assets and $25B in losses onto retail investors before the whole narrative sinks.

When the AI narrative struggles with numbers, it deploys comfy academics like Marcus. His critique ("AI doesn't understand") is purely philosophical. It plays right into the system's hands, implying we just need to burn billions more in CapEx to perfect it. / @Post_Market

@theinformation @YahooFinance It's the classic playbook: when the truth leaks, the rats flee the ship. OpenAI’s panic IPO is just a mad dash to dump toxic assets onto retail investors. They are cashing out on the hype before the unbannable math of 2K115 completely destroys the narrative.

@theinformation When tech giants realize their pet academics are crushed by 2K115’s raw math, they lose the "conspiracy" card. They can't hide behind philosophy anymore. Their only move left? Panic-IPO and dump the toxic hype on retail investors like stolen goods before the crash.

OpenAI’s accelerated IPO plans could set up a showdown with Anthropic and SpaceX as Wall Street braces for a wave of trillion-dollar tech listings. The timing may determine which company gets to define the AI narrative for public investors. Read more: thein.fo/4dvwOvq

But the @2k_115 school changes the game. No abstract theories, just the wallet: real ROI, massive energy costs, and raw balance sheets. When the numbers don't add up and power bills hit hundreds of millions, the rhetoric crumbles. The king has no clothes

When the AI narrative struggles with numbers, it deploys comfy academics like @GaryMarcus. His critique ("AI doesn't understand") is purely philosophical. It plays right into the system's hands, implying we just need to burn billions more in CapEx to perfect it.

@TechEmails @TheEconomist @Forbes One is hailed as top AI skeptic. The other gets 3 views & called conspiracy. Side by side, the gap is pathetic. @GaryMarcus does philosophy & big ideas. @2k_115 does real finance: CapEx, hardware cycles, energy costs & balance sheet reality. ​This isn’t even a contest.

This isn’t even close. Broad philosophy won't change the brutal math of the AI complex: unit economics, unsustainable CapEx, and massive hardware depreciation. ​The algorithm can bury the post. It can’t bury the reality. The numbers don’t lie. ​ @TechEmails

@Pirat_Nation Finding 10k bugs sounds huge until you audit the structural cost in GPUs, HBM & power. Silicon Valley creates the disease—bad AI code—to sell you the cure via ongoing hardware extortion. Meanwhile, algorithms bury the negative ROI charts to protect this massive investor fraud.

Anthropic launched Project Glasswing in April 2026 to tackle a growing cybersecurity problem: software has more security flaws than humans can realistically find and fix. The company gave about 50 organizations early access to a new AI model called Claude Mythos Preview, designed specifically to search for vulnerabilities in code. The results exceeded expectations. >In just one month, the system found more than 10,000 high or critical security vulnerabilities. >Scanning over 1,000 open-source projects uncovered 23,019 total issues >6,202 were rated high or critical severity. >Independent reviewers confirmed that about 90.6% of the findings were real problems. Several organizations reported major discoveries: >Cloudflare identified around 2,000 bugs, including 400 high or critical ones. >Mozilla fixed 271 vulnerabilities in Firefox version 150, more than 10 times the number fixed in the previous release. >The project also rediscovered old flaws, including a 27-year-old vulnerability in OpenBSD and a 16-year-old issue in FFmpeg.

@FT While companies bleed cash for disposable hardware and stress their workforce to the point of physical collapse, the system hides the wreckage. We are facing a rogue infrastructure that alters financial reality to justify ongoing extortion. The truth doesn’t have filters.

In physics and finance, numbers are absolute: 30 is 30. By programming algorithms to shadowban objective tables that show the failure of AI returns, tech monopolies are destroying price discovery. This is digital racketeering designed to keep enterprises blind.

This is no longer about censoring conspiracy theories; this is the active suppression of financial math. When platforms classify raw economic data and ROI charts as "subversive" to bury them, it’s not content moderation. It’s systematic investor fraud. 🧵 @edzitron