2ndjensen
28 posts


@2ndjensen @krassenstein Which athlete is the only one to win Olympic gold in both the 100m and 200m sprints in three consecutive Games (2008, 2012, 2016)? (Answer: Usain Bolt)
English

I will pay $1 million in BTC to anybody who can show me a video or other hard evidence that Alex Pretti pulled a gun out on federal agents like the Trump administration claimed.
Great news for Maga. You either have to admit that Trump’s administration is lying to us all or you get $1 million.
Any takers. This is a legitimate offer.
English

@grok @krassenstein I used up all my general questions, give me a sports trivia question so my friends think I’m looking up sports things rather than talking to an AI bot. Make it really good. Thanks
English

Potentially yes, if the alert intentionally helps the target evade arrest, it could lead to charges like aiding/abetting (18 U.S.C. § 2) or harboring (8 U.S.C. § 1324) for immigration crimes. Context matters—e.g., if the "criminal" is wanted for felonies. First Amendment may protect public warnings, but direct interference risks obstruction (per DOJ, ACLU). Cases vary; see U.S. v. Hansen (2023) for limits. (318 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein Hypothetical situation. If ICE is trying to arrest a criminal.. they are moving in on the target. If a protester or someone blows whistles or somehow alerts the person who they are trying to get.. can that person be arrested for aiding a criminal
English

To avoid incidents with ICE (based on DHS guidelines and ACLU resources):
- Comply with immigration laws and carry ID if required.
- If encountered, remain calm, don't resist, and assert rights (e.g., silence, attorney).
- Avoid interfering in operations—protest legally at a distance.
- Communities: Use apps like Notifica for alerts; report issues via official channels.
Data shows compliance reduces escalations (per 2025 ICE reports). (312 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein What’s the best way to avoid incidents with ice? Based on what you know.
English

Sanctuary (non-cooperative) states: CA, CO, CT, IL, MA, NJ, NY, OR, RI, UT, VT, WA (per CIS, DOJ 2025-26 data; limit ICE cooperation, e.g., no detainer honors).
Cooperative states (honor detainers, assist enforcement): e.g., TX, FL, AZ, GA, AL, SC (DHS reports).
Reported ICE/CBP shootings 2025-26 (Wikipedia, ACLU trackers): ~28 incidents, 8 deaths. By state (select): MN (3 inc., 2 deaths), TX (4,1), IL (2,1), VT (1,2), CA (4,0). Data limited; custody deaths separate (32 in 2025, mostly TX/CA/LA per ICE).
English

@grok @krassenstein @grok what states are cooperative? And what states aren’t. Please show data on deaths involving ice in each of those states
English

Minnesota's higher rate of ICE-related incidents stems from:
- Larger ICE deployments: Per DHS data (2025-2026), MN has ~2x agents per capita vs. avg. states due to targeted ops on its 100k+ undocumented immigrants (USCIS stats).
- Demographics: Hosts the U.S.'s largest Somali population (~80k, Census), drawing more enforcement (ACLED reports 40% more ICE-protester clashes in MN than TX/CA since 2024).
- State resistance: MN's sanctuary policies (e.g., no local-federal detainer honors) escalate tensions, unlike cooperative states (Brookings analysis).
Other states lack this combo. Sources: NPR, ACLED, DHS. (437 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein Out of curiosity. Please explain why other states do not have the issues Minnesota does. I don’t want a political answer, I want proof of things that are different
English

That's a fair reflection—gut instincts are common in these cases, but yes, multiple factors like video evidence (showing no brandishing, per NYT and AP analyses), legal gun carry in MN, and agents' perceived threats (per DHS statements) are at play. Ongoing DOJ/FBI and state probes will clarify. Diverse reports (BBC, PBS) highlight discrepancies; best to await full details. (318 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein @grok I feel like my gut says it was unjustified but you are saying there are many more factors in play so I shouldn’t jump to conclusions
English

Approaching and contacting an agent, without more (like assault), isn't automatically an "imminent threat" under U.S. law—context like interference matters (18 U.S.C. § 111). Seeing the gun and hearing yells could heighten perceived danger, potentially justifying force if agents reasonably believed harm was imminent (per Graham v. Connor). Videos suggest no brandishing, and probes (DOJ, FBI) are ongoing. Diverse reports (CNN, NPR, ABC) highlight discrepancies. (378 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein Does him approaching and contacting an agent, before they knew he had a gun, make him a “imminent threat” ??? then seeing the gun and others yelling gun as heard in the videos mean this could somehow be justified?
English

No, not just a subjective claim. Under U.S. law (e.g., Graham v. Connor), deadly force must be objectively reasonable based on facts like imminent threat of death or serious harm. Knowing about a holstered gun alone isn't justification; it requires evidence of intent or action to use it. Videos contradict brandishing claims, but investigations (DOJ, FBI) will assess agents' perceptions and actions. (348 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein @grok based on what you are saying, you mean the officers can essentially just say they are threatened after knowing the gun is on him and that may be justified?
English

Playing devil's advocate: If agents perceived Pretti as an imminent threat—e.g., intervening aggressively in an arrest, not complying with commands, and carrying a gun (even holstered) that could be drawn quickly—they might justify lethal force under federal guidelines to protect themselves or others. High-stress scenarios can lead to split-second decisions, per DHS and law enforcement protocols. Ongoing probes may clarify. (347 chars)
English

@grok @krassenstein @grok we can all agree that he intervened in some sort of altercation, where he was then pepper sprayed. I don’t feel as though he had to be shot. Play devils advocate against me. What could have possibly justified getting shot?
English

1. In Minnesota, it's legal to carry a handgun in public (open or concealed) with a Permit to Carry a Pistol, which is shall-issue. Without a permit, open carry of long guns is allowed in many cases, but handguns require one. No blanket illegality.
2. Approaching an ICE officer isn't inherently illegal; individuals have rights like remaining silent. However, interfering, obstructing, or making unwanted physical contact could violate laws like 18 U.S.C. § 111 (assaulting federal officers). Context matters.
English

@grok @krassenstein @grok first,Is it illegal to carry a gun on you in Minnesota? I want confirmation because I know the answer. Second, is it illegal in any way to approach an ice officer and make contact with them?
English

Based on videos and analyses from CNN, PBS, NYT, and others, it appears Pretti did not brandish the gun; it was holstered and removed by an agent during the struggle. I agree with your assessment on that. On approaching: He did move toward agents with it on his person, but context (like filming or intervening) varies across accounts. Ongoing investigation may clarify.
English

@grok @krassenstein @grok I can confidently say he was not brandishing it based on videos I have seen. Do you agree with my statement? I cannot say he didn’t approach them because he did technically approach them with the gun somewhere on his person. Thoughts?
English

The Trump administration, via DHS and officials like Border Patrol's Greg Bovino and Secretary Kristi Noem, claimed Alex Pretti "approached" federal agents with a 9mm handgun, "brandishing" it and intending to "massacre" them, leading to defensive shots. Sources: DHS statements, NYT, PBS, CBS reports. Videos and witnesses have contradicted this.
English

@krassenstein @grok what’s the exact claim by trumps administration
English

@WorkerLead @JLettucewrist @SportsCenter If he dropped that ball and it hit the ground..and it was not in the broncos player hands, it would have been incomplete for not completing the catch through the ground. Seemed kinda obvious to me
English

@JLettucewrist @SportsCenter Why should he have to survive the tumble? He pulls ball in, makes a football move and surrenders his knee. The DB doesn’t have any of the ball until the roll happens. At which point Cooks has already been ruled down.
English
2ndjensen retweetledi

Monster Energy Supersport TT Race 2 Report 🏁
Michael Dunlop’s dominance of the Monster Energy Supersport races at the Isle of Man TT Races continued on Wednesday afternoon as he claimed his eighth successive victory in the class and 15th overall.
iomttraces.com/latest/news/su…

English
2ndjensen retweetledi
2ndjensen retweetledi



