John M

Read this slowly. In 2020 the Bank of England created money at the push of a button. They bought government bonds at £100. Today they sold them for £23.41. Half a billion pounds. Gone before lunch. They printed it. They lost it. They billed you. Paid from your wage. Your tax. Your blood and sweat. They handed every UK household a £7,000 bill. You did not see it because they hid it in your tax. You did not push the button. You will pay anyway. This is theft.

Andreas Antonopoulos got mocked for being broke after teaching Bitcoin for 5 years then the community sent him $1.5 MILLION In December 2017 Roger Ver also known as Bitcoin Jesus mocked him on Twitter for never getting rich from Bitcoin Andreas replied that he had bought early but sold in 2013 to cover the rent and support his family because he didn't have much money Within 48 hours over 1,000 strangers sent him more than 100 BTC and one single person even sent 79 BTC, worth over $1 million at the time Those 100 BTC are worth over $7 million today

Irish teacher Enoch Burke has spent 650 days in jail and had his bank account frozen—all for refusing to use they/them pronouns for a student—leaving him locked out of his €40,000. Do you support freeing him and letting him sue the bank? A. Hell yes B. No

Saylor buying Bitcoin with fiat debt is the funniest thing in financial history. He found the Empire’s printer, plugged it into the Orange Death Star, and now every bond manager on Earth has to explain why they’re earning 4% in a currency being murdered by Congress.

Rape Gang Inquiry update. Our team is currently going through our draft report to ensure that all is legally sound for publication. The plan is straightforward. I intend to use parliamentary privilege in the chamber to name a number of the worst perpetrators/officials who we believe have escaped justice. We will then use private prosecutions to pursue those individuals through the courts, and eventually put them in prison. These are incredibly dangerous scumbags. It is an national network of organised crime - it is not simply disparate gangs. This is a comprehensive criminal network that is capable of the most evil acts. I will be informing the police, parliamentary security and the Home Office beforehand of who I intend to name and why - I also now have private security for the first time in my life. But do not underestimate the danger of these networks. It is organised crime of the very worst kind. We started this inquiry not to just talk, but to act. The report will be published after the elections as I want this to be a cross-party effort, and party politics should not interfere with any of our activity. Numerous Conservative MPs have been supportive, as have the Northern Irish and even a Labour MP attending the hearings. I want this to go beyond petty party politics. We still have a significant amount of money from the crowdfunder, and that is ready to privately prosecute. This is where we are. This is the plan. Thank you to everybody for your support.

Rupert’s GB News interview with Jacob Rees-Mogg… As you all know, Rupert has been banned from GB News for many months on Farage’s instruction. So we were pleasantly surprised when Jacob asked Rupert on his show (pre-recorded). What follows is not Jacob’s fault… It was agreed that the interview would go out entirely unedited. A shorter clip went on on Jacob’s show, then the ‘full’ interview would be put online. We were told. Jacob said so on his show, too... A longer clip did go online, but it was not the full interview… We suspected this may happen, so our team recorded his interview. We have the full recording. A segment was cut out, replaced by a VPN ad. The only ad in the whole video… What did the segment cover? Jacob asking Rupert about what happened regarding Reform’s attempt to put him in prison. Jacob raised how Rupert’s guns were seized. How his home was raided by armed police late on a Friday night as a direct result of the Reform allegations. Rupert explained, following Jacob’s questioning, that Farage had admitted their attempt to incriminate Rupert and imprison him on false allegations was entirely because he disagreed with Rupert’s position of deporting foreign child rapists - he said so publicly at a Reform press conference. Farage said it was ‘brutal’, but it had to be done. Rupert’s position is that foreign rapists and their accomplices should be removed - one the British people agree with. This was all cut from the interview, despite an agreement it would go out unedited. Rupert has spoken with Jacob about this, and the clip removal was not his decision - it is not Jacob’s fault. But why would GB News not want their viewers to at least hear both sides of the story? Farage, of course, is a shareholder in GB News - it is essentially his channel. Other GB News presenters have stated publicly that they will have Rupert on their show live and unedited and then gone cold and ignored him - Alex Armstrong, and Patrick Christys as two examples. There are others too... If GB News won’t welcome free, open and honest debate on its live shows - then honestly, what is the point of the channel? They have blamed the elections for not having Rupert on - that is totally false and debunked by media law experts. There was a ban before any elections, and there continues to be a ban now. Of course news channels can have politicians on. To suggest otherwise is ludicrous. Rupert is happy to go on GB News on two conditions - it is live and unedited. The continued censorship of Restore Britain is unacceptable.