sss

761 posts

sss banner
sss

sss

@3NNWYYM

在海外。只要你讨厌台湾人我们就是朋友。

United States Katılım Ağustos 2018
121 Takip Edilen24 Takipçiler
Moonlight🌙月光
Moonlight🌙月光@Moon1ightSt·
美国移民局调整绿卡申请流程 身为移民后代,月光认为这个改变很不人性化 夸张的是,许多美籍华人公开支持新政策🤯 因为他们认为,“自己已经成功上岸了,最好赶紧把入口给关上” 月光觉得,等政党轮替,换民主党上台时,也许又会开放移民政策 所以,如果想润的话,不必太焦虑 那么,特朗普所属的共和党,难道不怕流失选票吗? 一句话:不影响,因为只有公民才能投票! 这次受影响的移民群体,完全没有投票权 特朗普的基本盘是保守派选民,非常支持严控各种形式的移民 思想保守的老美认为,限制合法&非法移民、让外国人回国排队,是特朗普在兑现“美国优先”的竞选承诺 通过高门槛、削减名额来控制合法移民 并以强硬手段打击非法移民 这些都是美国保守选民想看见的
Moonlight🌙月光 tweet media
Moonlight🌙月光@Moon1ightSt

美国移民新政策出炉 对于申请绿卡的小伙伴们来说 确实是蛮麻烦的 移民局USCIS的官方公告写得让很多人看不明白 月光用小学生也能理解的程度来解说一下 基本上像是学校换了新校规,不让你在教室里直接换座位了 你必须先走出校门,回到你自己的家里(回母国) 接着,去学校专门的校外办事处(大使馆)重新排队申请 等拿到正式入校通知书后,才能再走进学校 为什么要改规则呢? 因为学校觉得,以前很多人利用参观校园的机会(临时签证)直接留下来(拿绿卡) 这对一直在校门口排队的人不公平,学校也更难管理 但是,走出校门重新排队很麻烦,要花很多车费(来回机票) 而且万一在校门口被保安拦住,不让再进学校(拒签、禁止入境美国) 就没办法和教室里的好朋友们团聚了😭 新校规对拿着学生签证(F1)和旅游签证(B1/B2)的人管得最严 另外,已经交了申请但还没拿到绿卡的人也非常焦虑 因为新校规没有说明以前的申请算不算数,不晓得会不会被突然赶出校门 如果是拿着工作签证(H-1B、L1)的人,可能还有特殊条款能争取留在校内办理 但是,现在的审查也比以前严格得多

中文
23
0
26
23.4K
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
白人就是喜欢这种drama叫嚣,好像自己受了多大委屈了似的,丢在中国不还得立刻去世啊
Jeremy Bernier@jeremybernier

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions. Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place. The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin. Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not. Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese) On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days. One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads. I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard. Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general. When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it. I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this. I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity. I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc. But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

中文
0
0
4
231
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
@whyyoutouzhele 根本不可能帮台,这些都是政客话术罢了,台湾人不会真的认为美国大兵会为了小黄人出击吧
中文
5
0
7
30.6K
李老师不是你老师
李老师不是你老师@whyyoutouzhele·
特朗普表示 今天习近平曾询问他,是否会派兵保卫台湾? 但是他拒绝向习近平回答这个问题。 “我认为,我们现在最不需要的, 就是一场远在9500英里之外的战争。 我认为那是我们最不需要的。我们现在做得很好。 如果事态发展到那一步,美国会保卫台湾吗? 我不想这么说。 我不会这么说。 只有一个人知道答案。你知道是谁吗? 就是我。只有我一个人知道。 习近平主席今天问了我这个问题。 我说,我不谈这个。 他今天问你的? 他问你会不会派兵,会不会这么做? 他问我会不会保卫台湾。 我说,我不谈这个。”
李老师不是你老师@whyyoutouzhele

特朗普与习近平合照环节,有美国记者向特朗普问及“台湾”。 特朗普沉默不语。随后和习转身离开。

中文
394
244
3.1K
2.5M
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
美国来个免签
中文
0
0
0
25
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
不展示武力是不行的
留刀不留刃@AK4772352947

众所周知自近代以来日本一直称呼中国为支那。。。。 中华民国成立后曾要求日本改称中国,但遭到日本拒绝。在这里我无意像祥林嫂般哭诉近代中国有多惨,日本如何欺压中国。毕竟二战中国才是战胜国,而新中国以来,日本也已改称中国。。。。。 长话短说。。。 我想说的是虽然日本已经不再称呼中国为支那,但却在称呼东海·南海时,用了东支那海·南支那海。。。只不过支那一词用的不是汉字而是表音的片假名シナ! 再看英语称呼,日本用的是国际惯用的East China Sea,South China Sea!既然如此日本为何不标记成东中国海·南中国海呢?为何一定要耍小心机呢? 有的人会说,那是习惯了,而且只是地理名称,用得着上纲上线吗?是这样吗?讹误战争刚开始不久,日本媒体铺天盖地控诉鹅侵略。某一天日本媒体几乎在同一时间将乌克兰的地名从原来一直习惯沿用的俄语改成了乌克兰语!最典型的例子就是基辅———俄罗斯民族的发源地精神圣地之一,从原来的俄语kiev改成了如今的ki—v!随后奇迹般的,日本整个国家从政府内阁国会到媒体电视网络民间,从左到右,一夜之间全改了过来! 也就是说,只要想改,很轻易就能改过来! 问题就是不想改!虽然国名从支那改成了中国, 但我就是要留个尾巴恶心你, 就是要以此潜移默化日本下一代和在日华人。。。。 你不知道吧?你不抗议吧?你默认了吧? 在此恳请中国政府以及驻日大使重视起来。。。。 为了国家名誉, 为了中日永久的友谊, 为祖国的山河正名! @ChnEmbassy_jp @VOICE_OF_PRC

日本語
0
0
0
11
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
@bbcchinese 哈哈哈,问港人台湾人,BBC这辈子有了🤣这就是为什么美国对华认知偏差,智库都是台湾人是吧,他们比日本人韩国人还烂
中文
0
0
3
1.2K
BBC News 中文
BBC News 中文@bbcchinese·
美国喜剧电影《穿着Prada的恶魔2》周四(4月29日)在亚洲多地上映,在正式上映前,该电影因被质疑歧视亚裔、强化刻板印象,而在中港台、日韩等地区引发讨论,并出现抵制声浪。BBC中文记者在台北与香港街头询问观众对此的看法。
中文
148
8
247
170.6K
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
@tianzige4 前车之鉴都多少了😂苹果不长记性?
中文
0
0
6
998
田字格
田字格@tianzige4·
印度加快推进苹果反垄断案,罚款或达380亿美元 。 当年苹果把中国部分产能转移到印度,说是去风险,恐怕没想到印度就是最大的风险😂
中文
105
41
388
78.5K
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
一整天就会谴责,没尿。别告诉我最后还是日本主动发起攻击。在很多人眼中,首先发起攻击其实就已经赢得人心了,都讨厌窝囊废。
中文
0
0
0
15
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
真是够了,废物一个
中文
0
0
0
7
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
中国人真的是很倒霉,在哪国生活都不舒适。
中文
0
0
0
8
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
@yeahwu404 管中国内地人有什么用?香港人台湾人才是黑你最严重的倒是管起来呀,是做不到吗?
中文
0
0
0
2K
1024
1024@1024DevHub·
中国IDC运营商面临在四月全面清理“翻墙”业务的重压 据知情人士提供的信息,中国大陆部分机房已收到指令严格清查“违规跨境访问”业务。4月1日开始的专项整治行动明确指出需整改的违规行为就是“翻墙”。不同于此前通知中使用的“流量转发”、“对等流量”、“网络安全隐患”等较为含糊的措辞。 最新的指令要求“坚决杜绝违规翻墙访问行为继续发生”。未能整改到位的机房将面临“永久关停”和“追偿”。 大部分“机场”使用的都是国内入口,受此影响,许多“机场”已上调费用、关闭注册、开启直连。管控比以往任何时候都要严格,从业人士只得寄希望于政策在以后某个时刻回归宽松。
中文
94
67
813
548.6K
sss retweetledi
Trumplus(互关)
Trumplus(互关)@trumplus2024·
@Leon14650704 秦汉收留长江以南百越,所以现在百越乱华。现在中国最大威胁就是在台在港在东南亚,认英王爷爷美国爸爸日本哥哥,勾结欧美日,搞独毒赌诈的那几千万浙闽粤桂琼百越胡化(欧美化)后代,影响华夏至今。
中文
3
1
1
354
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
@wangjianghuiCN 还政绩斐然呢,培养大殖畜还差不多。香港人也是奇怪,被白人歧视的一生,反而去舔白人
中文
0
0
4
674
汪江徽
汪江徽@wangjianghuiCN·
邓小平说:我今天下午就可以夺回香港。 撒切尔夫人说:你可以,但全世界都会认识到中国的真面目,一切会撤离香港,你会失去很多。你不能说你不喜欢某个合约,之后就毁约。你如果废除了这一份,别人不会再相信你签署的其它合约。我们在香港政绩斐然,人们可以比较我们和中国做法的不同。
中文
244
271
2.3K
875.4K
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
说什么话都没有用,中国不主动出击,打烂他们的嘴,他们的嘴就永远受政治社交媒体影响人云亦云的说着话,无论是白人还是日本人还是其他世界的人。
中文
0
0
1
19
sss
sss@3NNWYYM·
他们最后的问题的答案非常明显是犹太人。因为欧洲历史上发生了超级多驱逐犹太人的事件。很明显这是一条复仇之路。自己建国但是毁掉仇敌。
渡边君@JiaweiShen2568

Jiang Xueqin(中文译名江学勤,海外常称其为 Professor Jiang),是 2024-2026 年在 YouTube 及全球社交平台爆红的加拿大籍华裔地缘政治分析师、教育学者,也是 YouTube 频道Predictive History(预测历史) 的主理人。 他的出圈源于 2024 年 5 月发布的一段课堂分析视频,其中提出的三大核心预测,在 2025-2026 年陆续应验前两项,引发全球舆论轰动: ①预测美国前总统特朗普将在 2024 年大选中胜选,重返白宫; ②预测美国将联合以色列对伊朗发动军事打击; ③核心预判:若美伊冲突长期化,美国将在这场消耗战中遭遇战略失败,甚至动摇石油美元体系与全球霸权根基。 2025 年特朗普正式就职、2026 年 2 月底美以对伊朗发动军事打击后,这条旧视频被全网疯传,YouTube 单日播放量突破 400 万。他被《新闻周刊》(Newsweek)等海外主流媒体专题报道,被称作 “中国的诺斯特拉达穆斯”,还受邀登上美国头部政治访谈节目《Breaking Points》做连线分析,成为西方舆论场最受关注的华裔地缘政治分析师之一。 王路飞安利的这个访谈,我放个中文版各位凑合看,DeepSeek翻译不知道有无错漏。没有时间一一校对还请各位担待。

中文
0
0
0
24
Syan ¥Z
Syan ¥Z@yuxiang09456469·
@YLDLZN 她还写着非常讨厌巴基斯坦人,她竟然不知道巴基斯坦人跟印度人都是一个吊样,就大小阿三的区别
中文
3
0
184
8.8K
伊利丹
伊利丹@YLDLZN·
一个澳洲女生夸自己中国男友,让一个嫁给阿三的国女破防了。
伊利丹 tweet media伊利丹 tweet media伊利丹 tweet media
中文
28
15
543
141.2K
sss retweetledi
二爷Alex
二爷Alex@Alex8282019·
中国救助了70个台湾人从中东返回上海,民进党没有一句感谢,说是认知战;日本帮了两个台湾人,民进党感恩戴德。你就说这得有多贱吧。
二爷Alex tweet media二爷Alex tweet media
中文
380
122
3.4K
368.1K