jake

507 posts

jake banner
jake

jake

@8inchsk8er

Ontario Katılım Mart 2016
374 Takip Edilen90 Takipçiler
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@TherealAD45 The only brett worth holding is the OG Brett on Base. Stupid scammers can stfu
English
1
0
0
9
AD
AD@TherealAD45·
If youre buying boys club tokens the only one you need is $BRETT not the one on base, so bots please dont like this post, the real brett is on ethereum with the rest of the guys. Ethereum:0x240D6FAF8c3B1A7394e371792A3bf9D28DD65515 dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x16a…
English
5
11
49
1.9K
jake retweetledi
Cartoon Vibes
Cartoon Vibes@cartoonvibes26·
R.I.P. Ted Turner (1938–2026) 🕊️💔 A true television pioneer whose vision helped shape modern media and generations of animation fans around the world. From founding CNN to bringing Cartoon Network into millions of homes, his impact on entertainment and pop culture will never be forgotten. ❤️ Thank you for the memories, legend. #TedTurner #RIP #CartoonNetwork #Animation #Legend #Television
Cartoon Vibes tweet media
English
314
6.1K
32.3K
813.1K
jake retweetledi
Cos 🥚
Cos 🥚@_cosmas_·
$BRETT is quietly priming for a Giga run Many of you will fade and continue to ignore an obvious free ride You really think the #1 Crypto exchange in America won’t funnel 10s of billions into their ecosystem when the time is right? 2.3B ATH without CB or BASE in full swing. 10s of Billions are on the horizon DONT GET LEFT OUT AGAIN 👏👏👏
English
9
27
233
4.5K
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@ragzyart Pepe and Brett still have some billions in their future fo sho!!! LFG 😎👍
English
0
0
1
59
Ragzy X
Ragzy X@ragzyart·
$PEPE was called a scam $BRETT was called a scam $TROLL was called a scam solana:GvV7sFu6FHJsSVXfpG7xqFnWar3c7YkcC74rqe7Bpump was called a scam bullish on scams 📈
English
35
24
237
5.3K
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@ragzyart Honestly i think PEPE will EASILY hit 12b again. 50b mcap easy during the next big rally to ATH or even close to ATH.
English
0
0
1
196
jake retweetledi
Ragzy X
Ragzy X@ragzyart·
IMAGINE selling $PEPE or $TROLL at 2mil mc 🤣 bc you don’t know a shit meme from something with actual value not all memes are equal understand why $PEPE went to 12 billion understand why $TROLL is headed in that direction 2 of the most iconic memes & CAs coded with lore
English
25
29
280
7.3K
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@ragzyart What exchange/platform are you using to swap tokens on TON? where can i go to get into TON memes?
English
3
0
2
114
Ragzy X
Ragzy X@ragzyart·
my discord is up 10X on top $TON memes
Ragzy X tweet media
English
17
2
92
4.1K
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@gamestop @CrashiusClay69 I gave up playing fortnite, such a time and money suck.... But ngl if they put a Brett character skin into the game i'd go back and pkay as Brett for awhile in a heartbeat hahaha 😂👍
English
2
0
0
17
GameStop
GameStop@gamestop·
Need some green? Trade your Xbox or PS5 for $420.69 cash from 4/20 to 4/22.
GameStop tweet media
English
182
174
1.4K
293.3K
jake retweetledi
Sassygal
Sassygal@Sassygal1971·
Sassygal tweet media
ZXX
197
495
2.4K
14.7K
jake retweetledi
Crash
Crash@CrashiusClay69·
Been going on walks more and getting in the sun Helps a lot more than u think to get out there and walk I find it boring af But it makes u look more lean
GIF
English
77
44
495
24.3K
The White Whale
The White Whale@WhiteWhaleLabs·
If we are truly evaluating coins/tokens based on the questions I raised in my original post, here are a list of my favorites. Naturally, this list is no where near conclusive. Do not be offended if I left off your favorite coin. 1. bitcoin:native . The original vision was for payments. As has happened countless times throughout human history the market saw a better use case in a finite store of value product. More gold can be mined. More oil can be found. More fiat dollars printed. But BTC will always be BTC. 2. hyperliquid:native - for me this qualifies. It does have broader utility (staking to reduce fees on trading, with tiers to appease even the smallest of traders). True, its only utility for Hyperliquid traders but combined with the structural design of massive buybacks it pushes it up a category for me. I do NOT count the "utility" of paying gas fees on HyperEVM as this is a case where $50 in tokens is a lifetime of gas for most people. I also do not count the other uses of the token as utility as those use cases are not scaleable to a broader audience. But real life discounts for traders plus an aggressive buyback mechanism = category bump for me. 3. $AERO - this is a strong ownership of flow type token. A caveat: you need to lock, vote, actively participate to extract the maximum potential from owning this coin. Bigger caveat: do the math. Is expected ROI from your share of 100% of protocol trading fees a "good buy" at current prices, or is this a 10 year ROI path. But structurally, it fits the bill. 4. $TUNA - Disclosure: I'm one of the largest holders/stakers. 100% of protocol revenue distributed to stakers. Ask the same question as AERO. Does current protocol revenue give you a earnings path considering current token price. Not really. My $TUNA bet has always been a forward thinking one based on my own financial projections on the business, knowing their tech, knowing their team, and most importantly knowing their founder who is one of maybe a dozen good, honest people in all of crypto. 5. $GMX - I've never traded this one but if I'm being fair, it does qualify. Staked GMX earns a share of protocol fees and there exists a protocol buyback mechanism. But again, just because revenue is actually shared doesn't make it a good buy. It's time to break out the calculator and do some math. There are others but you get the idea. Why did I leave out ETH? The recent reduction in gas fees. I still consider it a Blue Chip asset. ETH will always be Queen to BTC's King status. In summary: BTC has seen global adoption as a store of value with a finite supply. HYPE has scaleable utility to the average trader + aggressive buybacks. AERO shares revenue, but you're signing up for a job. TUNA has the cleanest approach with 100% of revenue given to stakers, but is a bet on the future revenue increase of the protocol. GMX has an interesting mechanism of partial revenue share plus buybacks. All should be evaluated based on current market price, realistic ROI potential + timeline. You would not buy a stock just for the dividend rate if you expected your losses in a stock's price to outweigh your dividend earnings. The same should be applied in crypto.
jake@8inchsk8er

@WhiteWhaleLabs Not ask the obvious dumb dumb question, since i know how people latch onto hype trains... But could you give some examples of cryptos that have been GOOD examples in recent past? In a pool of swirling crap, are there any that historically have been examples of what you speak of?

English
17
3
72
10.7K
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@WhiteWhaleLabs This is fantastic, and i'm honoured my question was valid enough for a follow up post! 😄 I was hoping Aero would be in there somewhere tbh haha... How do you feel about MORPHO out of curiosity? Alot of people compare it to Aero
English
2
0
4
311
jake
jake@8inchsk8er·
@WhiteWhaleLabs Not ask the obvious dumb dumb question, since i know how people latch onto hype trains... But could you give some examples of cryptos that have been GOOD examples in recent past? In a pool of swirling crap, are there any that historically have been examples of what you speak of?
English
2
0
4
11K
The White Whale
The White Whale@WhiteWhaleLabs·
We evaluate coins all wrong. We love to talk about protocol revenue like we’re analyzing stock market tickers. “Look at the fees.” “Look at the revenue.” “Look at the fundamentals.” Cool. But these are not shares of a company. Most protocols do not pay dividends. Most tokens do not entitle holders to cash flow. Most “governance” is an illusion of shareholder rights, except without the shareholder rights. So why are we larping as TradFi analysts? If a token captures no revenue, controls no meaningful value, and gives holders no enforceable economic claim, then protocol revenue may be great for the protocol, great for insiders, great for validators, great for market makers… But what exactly is it doing for the token holder? That is the question nobody wants to ask. “Utility” gets thrown around the same way. Utility for whom? Utility for the average holder? Utility for the protocol? Utility for the team? Utility for liquidity providers? Utility for insiders who already own the supply? Utility only for the scarce few B2B customers? Because "utility" without broad usage is not a scaleable argument for adoption. A protocol can be useful while its token is structurally useless. A chain can have activity but yet gas fees are so low it doesn't even matter if everyone uses that chain. Not when a $50 purchase of the native coin can be a lifetime of gas fees for the average user. A governance token can have billions in FDV while giving holders the sacred right to vote on proposals that insiders, foundations, delegates, and whales already effectively control. That is not ownership. The real question is not, “Does this protocol make money?” The real question is: Does the token own anything? Does it control anything? Does value actually flow back to the asset? Is there a structural reason the token must appreciate if the protocol succeeds? Or are you just donating exit liquidity to people who figured out token design better than you did? The next phase of crypto valuation needs to move past surface-level “revenue” hype and start asking harder questions about ownership, control, value capture, dilution, supply structure, and who actually benefits when the machine works. Because in crypto, the protocol can win while the token holder loses. And once you see that, you stop asking, “What does this protocol do?” You start asking, “What does this token own?” If a token: Does not act as a scarce store of value Does not have a case for mass-market utility Does not share revenue with holders Then: Be aware you are only bidding on the belief that other bidders will come after you to make the price go up. If you find yourself doing mental gymnastics about what a token actually is in order to justify your bullish posture, it may be time to reevaluate your trade thesis. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋
English
50
25
183
12.9K
Ragzy X
Ragzy X@ragzyart·
GM Vegas ♠️♦️ I’m building something epic… see you soon 🍔👀 @TheBitcoinConf
Ragzy X tweet media
English
45
6
211
5.3K
jake retweetledi
jake retweetledi
The White Whale
The White Whale@WhiteWhaleLabs·
Here’s a thought to meditate on: Bitcoin doesn’t have a price. It has an exchange rate. Against whatever fiat you’re quoting against. 🫡🐋
English
30
13
192
13.3K
jake retweetledi
axe
axe@5yuffbbb88105·
People calling $Brett dead aren’t doing the math. $Floki Inu went from 1B to 30M last bear market and made new all time high after $Brett is earlier No major CEX listings No native Base token One of the biggest airdrops hasn’t happened yet Main liquidity isn’t even here.
axe tweet mediaaxe tweet media
English
32
74
456
48.4K
jake retweetledi
Crash
Crash@CrashiusClay69·
@erozcapital Brett is one of the last memes standing it will inevitably pump hard in the next wave when attention is on Base and memes once again
English
38
57
458
9.1K
jake retweetledi
Crash
Crash@CrashiusClay69·
If I never tweeted again The real G’s already got what you needed from me to make 100x-1000x in the next wave without me Teach a man to fish/think Some of you know you’ve already won
English
158
74
825
37.8K