British_CItizen_x

53.6K posts

British_CItizen_x banner
British_CItizen_x

British_CItizen_x

@955196

Words are opinion, retweets approval of the message not the messenger.

United Kingdom Katılım Şubat 2014
0 Takip Edilen636 Takipçiler
British_CItizen_x retweetledi
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreat·
Turns out diversity is not our strength
Basil the Great tweet media
English
29
91
355
4.2K
British_CItizen_x retweetledi
Maurice Cousins
Maurice Cousins@MDC12345678·
This is pure bollocks from @ECIU_UK. They are projecting. Meat prices have been getting more expensive due to domestic policy choices lobbied for by green campaigners - chiefly higher energy costs and emissions-driven constraints on production. It is one of the oldes tricks in the book to blame price increases on exogenous factors. It is how obscurantists cover their tracks when the consequences of their own decisions become impossible to ignore. We saw the same with UK food price inflation in the 1970s when the government would blame it on onion fly and carrot rot.
ITV News@itvnews

Lamb costs soared over last three years due to climate change, report says itv.com/news/2026-04-0…

English
2
22
104
2.7K
Farrukh
Farrukh@implausibleblog·
Left: President Trump, "Regime change (in Iran) was not our goal" Right: President Trump, "But we also want regime change (in Iran)" These two speeches were on the same day 🤷‍♂️
English
347
6.7K
25.6K
948.6K
British_CItizen_x retweetledi
Magatte Wade
Magatte Wade@magattew·
You don't need a PhD to understand why people are poor. Poverty goes away when prosperity shows up. And prosperity doesn't fall from the sky or get delivered by a UN truck.  It gets built by entrepreneurs who start businesses, hire people, and create things worth buying.  But those entrepreneurs need somewhere they can actually operate without spending half their life begging for permits and paying fees to people who produce nothing. Countries that get this right get rich. Countries that don't, stay poor.  The whole thing fits on a napkin and yet we've got entire university departments overcomplicating it.
English
106
528
2.2K
39.2K
British_CItizen_x
British_CItizen_x@955196·
✅ Intercontinental traffic is undersea. ❌ No satellites are required for routing. ❌ No satellites are required for timing. ❌ No satellites are required for handoff.
British_CItizen_x tweet mediaBritish_CItizen_x tweet media
Jeremy@ManaByte

Earth isn’t flat, the Moon landing wasn’t faked, and space isn’t some CGI dome. These claims fall apart the moment you look at the technology we use every day. None of it works unless Earth is a sphere in a real cosmos. Start with GPS. Your phone calculates your position by comparing timing signals from satellites orbiting Earth. Those satellites move at precise speeds and altitudes that only make sense in a real vacuum. If Earth were flat or if space were fake, GPS would fail instantly. No navigation, no rideshare apps, no airline routing, no global timing systems. The entire system depends on orbital mechanics that match what physics predicts for a spherical planet. Satellite internet, satellite TV, and weather forecasting all rely on the same reality. We watch storms form from orbit. We track hurricanes across oceans using data from satellites operated by different countries and private companies. These systems agree with each other because they are observing the same real planet from space. If space were fake, every meteorologist, every aerospace engineer, every telecom company, every airline, and every military on Earth would have to coordinate a perfect lie for decades. That is not possible. Now to the claim that NASA fakes photos of Earth. This is one of the easiest conspiracy theories to debunk because NASA is not the only source of Earth images. Not even close. Dozens of countries and private companies have their own satellites that photograph Earth constantly. Weather satellites from Europe, Japan, India, and South Korea all produce their own full‑disk images. Private companies like Maxar and Planet Labs take high resolution photos of Earth every day for commercial clients. Amateur radio operators receive live images directly from NOAA satellites using equipment you can buy online. None of these systems rely on NASA. None of them match a single centralized source. Yet they all show the same spherical Earth from different angles at different times. If NASA were faking Earth photos, every other space agency and every private satellite operator would have to fake them too. They would also have to coordinate the lighting, cloud patterns, storm movements, and surface features in perfect sync. That is not happening. The simplest explanation is the correct one. Multiple independent systems are photographing the same real planet. The Moon landing is even harder to deny once you look at the tech. We still interact with the equipment the astronauts left behind. Observatories fire lasers at the retroreflectors sitting on the lunar surface and receive the return signal at the exact predicted intervals. This is not a theory. It is a measurement that universities and independent facilities repeat all the time. You cannot fake a laser return from nearly 240,000 miles away. Even the internet used to spread these conspiracies relies on space infrastructure. Undersea cables carry most traffic, but satellites handle the rest. The timing, routing, and handoff between systems only work because the satellites are actually in orbit. If space did not exist, the global communications network would collapse. The irony is simple. The technology that flat Earth believers and Moon landing deniers use to post their claims is the same technology that proves them wrong. The evidence is not hidden. It is built into the functioning of the modern world. You can reject the conclusions, but you cannot reject the infrastructure that makes your phone, your internet, your weather alerts, your maps, your flights, and your entire digital life possible. These conspiracies do not just fail scientifically. They fail technologically, mathematically, and logistically. They only survive when people stop paying attention to the systems they rely on every day.

English
0
0
0
25
British_CItizen_x retweetledi
Caitlin Johnstone
Caitlin Johnstone@caitoz·
Seeing New York Times editors say NATO stands for "North American Treaty Organization" on the same day CNN claims Iranians might help the downed pilot who was trying to bomb them because they're happy he's there really illustrates how fucked western journalism is, doesn't it? I mean, this is some serious baby-brained thinking on display here. That New York Times headline made it through MULTIPLE checkpoints before publication without it ever even occurring to anyone to at least do a quick Google search to find out if the A in NATO really does stand for "American", and, if so, why are there so many European countries in it? That CNN analyst really does have such an infantile, children's cartoon worldview on American wars that she thinks the people being bombed by US fighter jets will want to hug them and kiss them and give them presents when they emergency eject into enemy territory. It's kind of amazing that any of the people involved in either of these incidents are working in news media at all. If you've ever wondered why so many Americans are so ignorant about what's going on in their world, it's because for generations these have been the kinds of people informing them about world events. These are the news outlets who've been responsible for creating an informed populace. And their reporting is shared with the entire western world. I constantly criticize the western press for its role in propagandizing the public to manufacture consent for evil wars and normalize an abusive political status quo. You cannot despise these manipulators enough for their role in the world's dysfunction today. But these two incidents highlight the fact that the people running the western press aren't just evil — they're also really, really stupid.
Caitlin Johnstone tweet media
English
76
1.1K
3.9K
103.1K
British_CItizen_x retweetledi
Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
No one voted for: – EU rules back on our food – 76 Brussels regulations quietly re‑imposed – “Marmalade” banned unless the label says “citrus” first. But that’s Starmer’s “Brexit reset”. A country that can’t even name its own jam isn’t taking back control – it’s giving it away.
English
346
525
1.6K
19.5K
British_CItizen_x retweetledi
John Longworth
John Longworth@john4brexit·
What nonsense from those with Brexit derangement syndrome. Rejoin & lose self determination- are you so infantilised that you need technocrats to tell you what to do? Lose trading partners, pay £35 billion plus pa , lose the currency & control of interest rates, have open borders for ever , have protectionist tariffs increasing the cost of living , be dragged into a Euro army etc are you mad?!
Narinder Kaur@narindertweets

❗️FINALLY Starmer says it❗️ “It is increasingly clear that as the world continues down this volatile path our long term national interest requires closer partnership with our allies in Europe and with the European Union.. Brexit did deep damage to our economy” What are we waiting for?? REJOIN REJOIN REJOIN #EU

English
16
123
284
4.3K
anne mcelvoy
anne mcelvoy@annemcelvoy·
Exclusive 🇬🇧🇪🇺 : Britain’s troubled EU reset will be done by early summer – and feature in the King’s speech in May, Nick Thomas/Symonds @NickTorfaen tells me. Details on : 🔴”Hardball” negotiations on youth mobility terms with 🇪🇺 counterpart @MarosSefcovic 🔴 UK won’t back down on demands to lower uni fees for EU students 🔴 Econ alignment talks are going well 🔴 Iran crisis will help @Keir_Starmer survive Story here - and full convo on Westminster Insider podcast out today politico.eu/article/nick-t…
English
39
25
44
80.1K
British_CItizen_x retweetledi