Anthony Galan
189 posts
















The Massie-Khanna law does not provide for DOJ adding "context" to any file or release of files. It has 2 primary components -- 1) the documents that must be released, 2) information that may be redacted. The documents to be released include "all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorneys’ Offices" There is no reference to "context" to be added to any such record before it was released. The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material." The statute does not allow for redaction of those names nor does the statute provide that explanations for how investigatory materials were gathered or used should be required. How many thousands more DOJ attorneys does Massie think should have been employed to save idiots like him from himself? Massie's mistake in falsely claiming the four gentleman were pedophiles is a product of the legislation Massie wrote and championed. Massie should resign.


The problem is DOJ illegally redacted names without explanation and then refused to give context for the names once they redacted. This is why @RepThomasMassie and I have been pushing for the full release of the files with context and protecting survivors. Thanks for your reporting.




















Pam Bondi refuses to look at Epstein survivors during a hearing on the Epstein files.


Bondi is so unbelievably cooked. She’s a disgrace. Chief law enforcement officer and head of the entire Department of Justice is saying law enforcement and justice doesn’t matter because the stock market is at highs.













