آل معلم 2

There’s people who genuinely believe Messi is God… And tbh when you see how they live their lives it makes sense why they would. Their whole life revolves around him. Their mood, their cult like devotion, the hours, days, years spent obsessed over every little detail of his. They indeed took him as a deity.

Cowardliness will always be punished..

There is a clear lack of Adab towards the Prophet ﷺ here from Anwar. Also note a double standard: John Starling is accused with normalising and promoting Shirk and Bid’ah But the author of the book John Starling is reading from is someone considered to be an Imam of the Hanbalis.

One of the things I see with Dawah bros is that they love and put each other on incredibly high pedestals but when an inevitable difference pops up between them, they throw each other down into pits their actual enemies are never thrown in. Toxic.

The story of Prophet Yusuf is a refutation against “Believe All Women” Had the situation of Prophet Yusuf AS happened today, most women would side with the Chief Minister’s wife instead of Yusuf…

The issue of Al Udhr Bil Jahl summed up: Is this act Shirk? Yes. Do we call the person who does this act a Mushrik and treat them as such in this life? Yes. Why? Because names attach to realities, not to what is in someone’s head. You do the reality of Shirk, the name follows you. This is the same logic as any deliberate act: it is ascribed to the one who does it by his own will and power, whether he grasps it or not. So whoever falls into Shirk is named by it and has the worldly rulings applied. To make ignorance an excuse here in the naming itself is to deny self evident, innate first principles. What about in the hereafter? Punishment by Hell Fire and who is held accountable directly before Allah is where there is a genuine difference of opinion & ignorance may be a valid excuse.

As long as the Ummah continues to play within the rules and limits set by the current powers that be, the Ummah will never ascend back to where it belongs. Because those rules and limits are there to keep you down.

I may have spoken too soon…

Ummah FC has come alive. There could be 2 Muslim Arab nations in the Quarter Final of the World Cup? Never thought I’d see that in my life.

I know this Hadith is probably fabricated but it’s very important that we understand it in light of the scams that are becoming more rampant in our sphere. المؤمن كيس فطن حذر This maxim paints you O Mu’min as someone whose Iman does not make you gullible or passive. Your Iman is joined to having prudence (kayyis), being a person with penetrating insight (fatin), and excersies watchful caution (hadhir) You must possess intelligence that is directed toward the ākhira, have perception that reads people and circumstances as they are in reality, and vigilance that protects you from being deceived or exploited.

Ok it’s all well and good pointing it out but why is it the case this happens? And then what is the solution to fix it?

Too much Husn Al Dhan is a dangerous weapon that many Muslims have been taken advantage of with leading to them being scammed and their properties taken. Many genuinely believe you should always have Husn Al Dhan until its too late. Nah! sometimes red flags are red flags..

Note the order in 3:7: The goal (fitnah) comes before the tool (Ta'wil). Those with deviant hearts arrive with their agenda already then they hunt for the reading that suits it. This tactic was used in all eras: The Jahili pagans had the agenda of denial (Allah did not reveal anything to humans) Ahl al Kitab had the agenda of distortion (Ra'ina) Modern deviants have the agenda of dissolving all meaning by making the meaning infinite through the following three step process: Step 1: Historicising the text. The Quran is a product of a specific 7th century Arabian setting. The rulings therefore answer to that era and are not binding on ours. Step 2: The Prophet who came with this text is not here anymore. His Sunnah is rejected and not binding. Instead, the one sovereign over the Quranic meaning is ourselves. Not the Salaf, Not the Arabic Language, Not Usul Al Fiqh or Usul Al Tafsir. Step 3: If that's the case, the Quranic meaning can now be anything anyone wants.

What’s up with my YouTube? I’ve been working on developing a whole host of courses to be uploaded for free on YouTube soon inshallah.

The fatwa of Ibn Baz usually cited by those who want to defend these current normalisation agreements with the Zionist entity does not work. This is because of the Abrahamic Accords whose stated aim is a total abolishment of enmity with the Zionists. Ibn Baz wholly stood against the notion of abolishing enmity with the Zionists. See Majmu Fatawa Ibn Baz 8/221 onwards.

Is the use of 8:61 valid in the context of signing normalisation agreements with the Zionist entity? No! Because the Zionist entity does not incline to peace; instead they persist upon usurpation of land and in the killing and displacement of Palestinians. They also use these “agreements” and “treaties” to deceive and continue their expansion.