Sabitlenmiş Tweet
追日逐光
2.3K posts
追日逐光
@ASI_7888
#crypto 个人投资笔记，热衷一级市场alpha。#Bitcoin #AI #WLFI 这个市场的机会多得像海里的鱼，关键是得有耐心才能钓到大家伙！ （#RACA 0.00005-0.01） （#Parcl #NFT U本位10-2000）（ #WLFI 0.015-？？ 寻找下一个100X ， 业余图表分析师。
香港 Katılım Şubat 2021
1.8K Takip Edilen927 Takipçiler
还在盯盘玩PvP互割？醒醒吧，真正的华尔街老钱已经快把RWA板块的池子塞爆了。
我刚去拉了一遍年初到现在的链上数据，走势简直离谱。今年初 #RWA 整个板块的总市值才140多亿美金，3月份直接干到了236亿，今天看已经强逼304亿大关了！短短一个季度，百亿级别的净流入，你们见过哪个赛道在熊末牛初能有这种抽水机一样的吸金能力？
拆开看细分资金去向更吓人。现在冲进来的根本不是散户，全是机构的合规热钱。美债和货币市场基金（MMF）这块直接吃掉了168亿美金，绝对的一家独大。紧接着是黄金大宗的62亿和私募信贷的45亿。发现了吗？华尔街那帮西装暴徒根本看不上什么空气土狗，他们正在用最暴力的资金量，把现实世界的无风险收益率强行搬到链上。
很多人还没反应过来这意味着什么。今年下半年的主升浪，真正的超级风口根本不在那些虚无缥缈的叙事上。合规、生息、美元通道，这才是主线。上百亿的外部流动性已经进场了，随便溢出一点就能造出几个千亿市值的巨兽。
别天天盯着那点几百万市值的盘子做波段了，抬头看看天上正在下的钱雨吧。跟紧大资金的建仓方向，今年谁能拿下合规美债的通道，谁就是真正的王。
中文
@allen4924160433 @mscryptojiayi 整个市场哪个代币没有下跌？大饼都跌了百分之五十，哪个山寨不是百分之八九十的回调，熊市流动性退出导致的价格下跌，你指望项目方卖车卖房给你兜底？
中文
我实在忍不住了，毕竟一个是我客户一个是我前老板
但是Justin的策略这就是标准的天才PR方式而已。
即，把对手拉成用户对立面，把自己利益变成用户利益，然后模糊客观事实，利用吃瓜群众的情绪当成谈判的唯一筹码。
———我此时内心也忐忑哈哈 😂——
无争议的背景：
1. WLFI黑名单Justin在去年（不在我服务周期时）@EricTrump 已经说的很清楚是因为他发现Justin违反了他们合同，也就是Justin承诺不卖币的问题。 对他的操作是合同的双边责任和惩罚
感兴趣的人可以去查当时HTX做WLFI高apy吸储活动，大量WLFI token转到BN的故事。 写当时事情的post还是很多的呢
最后WLFI因为这位“超级投资人”的行为震怒。Justin对此回复说近千万美金代币转到交易所然后是测试而已 🥹。
之后Justin尝试为了平和拉拢尝试后期让项目方给解锁自己承诺将再购买1000万美金。 当然目前没有公布购买记录
2. 因为违反合同，所以WLFI把justin关联账户黑名单。 这可和其他用户利益无关，千万不要代表整个web3用户利益。
3 不是不让卖币，是违反合同在先。 如果这个不实， @justinsuntron 老板赶紧打官司。 社交媒体维权寻求声援没有用
4. 没有一家公司愿意公开技术权限钱包权限。 谁公开谁就对基本安全意识没有基础了解，我相信我前老板这么聪明自己公司绝对不会这么做。那你为什么喊WLFI这么做？
5. WLFI官方发会诉讼，是官方行为。并不是某个控制社交媒体小人物可以决定的事情。官方代表可以参考 @EricTrump 等bio上写着WLFI的人物
——— 😨 —————-
总体来说，我理性吃瓜，不愿为市场情绪牵着鼻子走更不愿最后自己成为别人陷阱的燃料。
每个人价值观不同， 我的价值观是坚决不助纣为虐。
哪怕我知道我保持沉默对自己才有利，我也清楚我发声会面临什么样的风险。
但我仍想自由的发言，客观的讲我看到的情况
最后的最后，有钱人动则100M美金的纠纷一定是官司纠纷。 建议证据提交然后对峙法庭，最后可以让大家根据法庭证据来理性吃瓜。
在此前，我希望我们行业少点撕逼要研究目前流动性这么差如何更好发展。 我作为一个散户，每天我逛tweet是想要看看行业进展，行业机遇。结果每天都是比娱乐圈还乱的剧本杀
H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞@justinsuntron
I am calling on World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi to publicly disclose who controls the single guardian EOA and the 3/5 multisig that govern the WLFI smart contract. Every investor has the right to know who holds the power to freeze their assets. Here is what on-chain records show: A single guardian EOA — which also sits on the multisig — blacklisted my wallet. That same address is the sole owner of a second guardian Safe with a threshold of 1. This means one person — one single individual — has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder's assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature. Who is that person? The community deserves an answer. Let me be clear about what this structure means: community governance and voting are meaningless. Every proposal, every vote, every claim of decentralized decision-making is theater. Real power — the power to freeze, to move funds, to control the protocol — sits with one anonymous EOA and a 3-of-5 multisig that answers to no one. The entire governance framework has been hollowed out from the inside. A project that claims to stand for decentralization and financial freedom cannot concentrate this level of power in a single anonymous address. If the WLFI team has nothing to hide, they should have no difficulty identifying who controls these keys.
中文
@worldlibertyfi @ZachWitkoff Regarding Proposal 53266, the Gold Paper originally stated a 12-month lockup starting from the TGE (Oct 2024). However, the current text says the 2-year cliff 'takes effect from the date this proposal passes.' This is a blatant time reset and a breach of the initial contract. Question: Will the team commit to hardcoding an absolute calendar date (e.g., October 2026) for the cliff's end into the smart contract? Yes or No? If not, you are forcing early supporters into an indefinite lockup trap.
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
For early supporters: All 17,043,666,558 locked early supporter tokens move to a 2-year cliff followed by a 2-year linear vest. Full allocation retained. Zero burn. Holders who do not affirmatively accept the new schedule remain locked indefinitely under existing terms.
English
@worldlibertyfi @ZachWitkoff Regarding Proposal 53266, the Gold Paper originally stated a 12-month lockup starting from the TGE (Oct 2024). However, the current text says the 2-year cliff 'takes effect from the date this proposal passes.' This is a blatant time reset and a breach of the initial contract. Question: Will the team commit to hardcoding an absolute calendar date (e.g., October 2026) for the cliff's end into the smart contract? Yes or No? If not, you are forcing early supporters into an indefinite lockup trap.
English
Regarding Proposal 53266, the Gold Paper originally stated a 12-month lockup starting from the TGE (Oct 2024). However, the current text says the 2-year cliff 'takes effect from the date this proposal passes.' This is a blatant time reset and a breach of the initial contract. Question: Will the team commit to hardcoding an absolute calendar date (e.g., October 2026) for the cliff's end into the smart contract? Yes or No? If not, you are forcing early supporters into an indefinite lockup trap.
English
For early supporters:
All 17,043,666,558 locked early supporter tokens move to a 2-year cliff followed by a 2-year linear vest. Full allocation retained. Zero burn.
Holders who do not affirmatively accept the new schedule remain locked indefinitely under existing terms.
English
@sleap_io @staynexcom So, do NFT holders not receive token airdrop rewards?
English
@ASI_7888 @staynexcom The Sleap.io platform remains unchanged for now, and all existing perks for NFT holders continue as they are.
What makes this even more exciting is the potential ahead as part of Staynex, there may be additional perks and benefits introduced in the near future.
English
⚠️UPDATE: $STAY TGE → 23 April
We recognize that we’ve revised timelines previously, and we truly appreciate the continued support and patience from our community.
Over the past weeks, we’ve taken a significant step forward with the acquisition of Sleap.io, strengthening our product, expanding our European market footprint, and integrating additional live booking infrastructure into our ecosystem.
Our priority is not speed, but quality of execution and long-term sustainability.
Staynex enters #TGE with:
🤝A combined and enhanced traveller experience across #Staynex and #Sleap’s live booking platforms
📈Proven real-world users and transaction activity
⚙️An integrated #token utility model
We’re in the final stretch now.
23rd April 2026 💫
A stronger start. A bigger runway. Together 🌍
#web3 #crypto
English
@worldlibertyfi Does the 2-year cliff start from the initial Token Sale (Oct 2024) or from the date this proposal passes? We demand an exact Calendar Date (e.g., Oct 2026) and a hardcoded smart contract timestamp to be explicitly written into the final voting text. No vague terms!
English
@staynexcom @staynexcom Have Sleap NFT holders been completely abandoned? What are we supposed to do with the NFTs we bought with our hard-earned money?
English
