Andrew Sanchez

7.2K posts

Andrew Sanchez banner
Andrew Sanchez

Andrew Sanchez

@ASanchez_PS

Hospitalist @BIDMC_IM Teaching/Learning Dx @HarvardMed❓, Co-host @Dx_Atypia 🦓 🐎, @CPSolvers Academy🕵🏽‍♂️, @YaleIMed @ColumbiaPS @UF 👨🏽‍🎓

Boston, MA Katılım Mayıs 2009
1.7K Takip Edilen8.5K Takipçiler
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Papa Heme
Papa Heme@Papa_Heme·
I am on vacation. Time to unwind, enjoy nature, and stare at a computer screen doing MOC. @MorieGertz
Papa Heme tweet media
English
9
2
57
4.5K
Andrew Sanchez
Andrew Sanchez@ASanchez_PS·
🏥 Teaching Service Day #4 🏥 Most common causes of acute cardiomyopathy/CHF in the hospitalized patient?
English
1
0
1
1.5K
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Saketh Vinjamuri
Saketh Vinjamuri@saketh_vinj·
Every square tells a story - a new schema, a sharpened illness script, a diagnostic pivot, a moment of uncertainty transformed into insight. A constant reminder that the best part of medicine is learning together. @CPSolvers Academy 😇
Saketh Vinjamuri tweet media
English
0
2
9
459
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Papa Heme
Papa Heme@Papa_Heme·
Hematologic chest pain Good luck cardiologists 55 yo male presents to ER with progressive SOB over the last few weeks and now acute chest pain. Troponin and BNP markedly elevated. WBC 39,000, Eos 37,000, Hgb 11, Plt 160 Karyotype below. Diagnosis? Fusion gene? Treatment?
Papa Heme tweet media
English
13
15
82
16.5K
Andrew Sanchez
Andrew Sanchez@ASanchez_PS·
🏥 Teaching Service Day #3 🏥 Humbling causes of orthostatic hypotension? What are the cognitive traps of o-hTN diagnosis?
English
1
0
9
1.9K
Andrew Sanchez
Andrew Sanchez@ASanchez_PS·
🏥 Teaching Service Day #2 🏥 What types of conditions result in acute hypotension with relatively minimal volume loss (e.g. no history of massive vomiting, massive diarrhea)? Large volume loss → hypovolemic hTN Minimal volume loss + [substrate?] → mixed hTN
English
2
2
13
2.7K
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Brian Locke, MD MSCI
Brian Locke, MD MSCI@doc_BLocke·
Disambiguating "errors" from "imperfect outcomes" would do so, so much to improve the diagnostic "error" literature in medicine. In poker, you can play your hand well and still lose the hand. Same in medicine. If you're talking about how providers behave, you must judge the "quality of play". If your point is how well systems work, you can talk about the other... but you must define whether your counterfactual is omniscience or something achievable - and frame conclusions appropriately.
English
1
2
9
1.5K
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Vinson Yew
Vinson Yew@Dokutah_Vyew·
GOATed this is why AI can never completely replace UpToDate, somebody needs to interpret the trials and describe how they might change practice in a readable way
Vincent Rajkumar@VincentRK

Here is the inside story on how @UpToDate does what it does. From my experience as an author/section editor for UpToDate for 20 years, here is how it works. It’s amazing! Every day a team of people @UpToDate scour the top medical journals (and major meeting abstracts) for articles of importance. In my case they pertain to myeloma and related disorders. Any article that is felt to be important is sent to a expert MD medical editor at UpToDate who reviews the paper. If the information is felt to be important, the relevant chapter is updated with this content, summarized in a few sentences in Word track and then sent to the author of the chapter who is a top expert in the field. As an author I have to review the update in detail and then make a decision whether to include the new information, and whether the way it has been incorporated is correct or needs to be edited. Once I make a decision, it is then reviewed by an expert section editor. For 15 years for me, the section editor was Dr. Robert Kyle! (Currently I’m the section editor and we have about 6 experts serve as authors on over 40 chapters pertaining to myeloma and related disorders). The section editor independently decides whether the author made the right call and either approves or we have a back and forth till we agree. The updated chapter is then reviewed again by the expert MD editor at UpToDate and then posted. For important phase III trials or FDA approvals we usually make the update within a week. Sometimes by the next day! With so many important papers, every week there are 2-3 updates pertaining to my chapters that go through the above process! It’s hard work but it keeps me ridiculously current. And more importantly it keeps the content accurate and current. This is not random addition of new information. It’s vetted information that’s added. Every UpToDate chapter is also peer reviewed annually. Each chapter also undergoes an annual author and editor review to make sure that the overall content and flow is good and to delete content that may be no longer important or accurate. The extraordinary process and rigor involved is why it’s such an invaluable irreplaceable resource. It is AMAZING and hard to replicate. UpToDate is easy to navigate. But the newly launched UpToDate Expert AI takes it to the next level! It makes the entire content available to query just like you query a top ranked LLM. But it’s not searching the random internet or a stack of published articles. It’s primarily trained and derives vetted and adjudicated UpToDate content. It will not randomly hallucinate. It will not list 10 options for treatment newly diagnosed myeloma but will give you what experts currently feel is the best option based on the latest evidence. All answers are referenced and pointing to specific content sections in UpToDate (which also has links to source material). So you can immediately get all the background information if you need more detail. Working with UpToDate has helped my career immensely. For the last 20 years it has been impossible for me to not know about every important study related to myeloma and related disorders as they get published! For 20 years, I have received a precise summary of every important article published in my field. More importantly I am forced to read them, review the source material, and make a judgment call. As a result I remember this stuff. A gift indeed!

English
0
5
17
3.3K
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Ryan O'Keefe
Ryan O'Keefe@ROKeefeMD·
@ASanchez_PS x.com/ROKeefeMD/stat… Most know at this point, but usually don't need to cover anaerobes unless there are non-oxygenated areas where they might grow, such as an abscess, cavitation, or empyema!
Ryan O'Keefe@ROKeefeMD

Aspiration pneumonitis is an important mimic of pneumonia, and it can be hard to distinguish between the two. Here's a brief thread to help you sort them out and approach treating aspiration pneumonia! - Thread - 1/7

English
0
3
8
964
Andrew Sanchez
Andrew Sanchez@ASanchez_PS·
🏥 Teaching Service Day #1 🏥 Lots of good cases from today, but favorite topic that came up was the many clinical faces of aspiration. #MedTwitter, what are your essential aspiration pearls?
English
1
2
18
2.3K
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
Society of Thoracic Radiology
Chest Computed Tomography Findings in Unilateral Pulmonary Fibrosis Secondary to Chronic Hypoperfusion.” A recent article on an interesting phenomenon. Any cases in the wild? tinyurl.com/mr9rpkwm
English
0
2
6
558
Andrew Sanchez retweetledi
RadioGraphics
RadioGraphics@RadioGraphics·
Not all pulmonary emboli are thrombotic. NTPE includes septic, tumor, fat, air, and iatrogenic causes—often mimicking PE but needing different management. Imaging clues and clinical context are key for timely diagnosis. @BrighamRad @BWHRadEdu bit.ly/4d20C2N
RadioGraphics tweet media
English
0
15
80
6.6K