⭕️Faerie ❤️@LiquidFaerie
Look, mate, you’re twisting history like it’s elastic. Herzl did use words like “colonial” and talked about a “Jewish Company” in The Jewish State. But he wasn’t hiding some grand empire plot. Back then, “colonial” just meant organised settlement, often to escape persecution.
He was pitching practical ways to save Jews from pogroms in Europe. That’s not the same as Belgium chopping up the Congo for rubber.
He floated Argentina as one option, sure, and later the British offered a spot in East Africa, called the Uganda Scheme. It was meant as a temporary refuge for Jews getting slaughtered in Russia. Herzl saw it that way, a stop-gap to buy time.
The Zionist Congress debated it hotly, many walked out in tears because it wasn’t Zion. They rejected it. The focus stayed on the ancient Jewish homeland in Judea. Not some random land grab.
Jews aren’t settlers in the classic sense. They’ve got a continuous tie to that land for over 3,000 years, language, archaeology, the works. They weren’t sent by a mother country to exploit it. They bought land legally under the Ottomans and British, built farms and cities from swamp and sand, often facing attacks.
Self-determination after centuries of exile and massacre. That’s the core.
Calling it “explicitly settler colonial” ignores the desperation driving it. Imagine being a Jew in 1890s Russia, watching your neighbours murdered. You’d grab any chance for safety, and most clung to the dream of going home, not playing mini-Rhodesia.
Herzl spoke Rhodes’ language in that one letter to appeal for help. Smart move, not a confession.
Israel exists now because people fought for it, survived wars started by neighbours who rejected any Jewish state.
Zionism got the job done. It’s not an ongoing “ideology” of conquest. It’s a country with people living their lives. Pretending otherwise just dodges the simple fact: the Jews came back to our ancestral patch. Full stop.