Accra Digital Digest

Subscribe to the Accra Digital Digest for all the news making rounds in tech in Ghana here: linkedin.com/newsletters/ac… #accradigitaldigest

consequences

Respect to the very few real journalists left 🫡 @TechLabari is another one I can vouch for Cancel everything else and don’t give them business. Also, let’s built alternatives that support the real ones and push the unevolved into extinction - like the dinosaurs 🦖 🦕 they are

Despite a very full plate, I have been needled by a Ghanaian business journo friend of mine based in NYC to have a go at the debate that has taken Ghana's tech community by storm: the draft NITA bill. My short essay effectively aligns with what everyone else is saying: shred the bill and come back with something more aligned with modern tech reality! But in the tradition of the Scarab, I try to go into a bit more detail than most mainstream pieces. I also point out something that seems missing in the debate. With the rapid surge of technologies like AI, everyone is or will soon be doing stuff previously considered "ICT professional stuff." Licensing ICT professionals is akin to licensing bloggers in today's rowdy information environment: trying to stop a hurricane by blowing fumes from one's mouth. brightsimons.com/2026/05/the-dr…

@aenathaniel @NITAGhana @kwekutech @TechLabari @AccraDigiDigest @Legaltec_lounge @NaaAnyoko Nobody. Regardless of party. No one wants this.

Guys, especially those of us in the tech community need to show your disdain for this one way or the other. Join @TheDumbTechGuy and many others on this space x.com/TheDumbTechGuy…. This is not the way forward for Ghanaian engineering. Deeply hope we can fight this

Happy African Union Day! Today, we celebrate Africa’s unity, strength, culture, and the progress we have made. Together we can build a stronger, brighter future for Africa. #NodeEight #AfricanUnionDay #AfricaDay

Mahama Commissions Solar-Powered ICT Lab in Savannah Region Trident Digital Launches $800M Digital Citizen Platform with Ghana Revenue Authority GIMPA Tech Fair and Industry Showcase 2026 Read the full stories here: bit.ly/4tXjhDo #AccraDigitalDigest #DigitalEconomy

Happy New Week, friends 👋🏾, Here’s what’s trending in Ghana’s digital space on #AccraDigitalDigest this week: Regulation or Roadblock? Ghana's Tech Community Takes NITA On! Ghanaian Startups That Raised Funding in 2026 #AccraDigitalDigest #DigitalEconomy #GhanaTech #AI 1/2

How the NITA feed were cooked. MoCDI: You guys(NITA) for find extra revenue to survive oo. We can’t keep financing you. You see your half brother at NCA deh chill up. NITA: Hold me beer. The tech bros & sis for X Dey collect waa. Make I bill them.

Here are all "15 DRAFT BILLS" from Ghana's Ministry of Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations (MoCDTI), with direct PDF links to each draft: 1. **Emerging Technologies Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 2. **Data Harmonisation Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 3. **Digital Economy & Innovation Development Fund (DEIDF) Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 4. **Misinformation, Disinformation, Hate Speech & Publication of Other Information (MDHI) Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 5. **Ghana Domain Name Registry Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 6. **Ghana Innovation & Start-Up Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](ghanastartupbill.org/wp-content/upl…) 7. **GI-KACE (Ghana-India Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT) Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) --- **Replacement/Amended Legislation** 8. **National Communications Authority Bill, 2025** *(replaces Act 769, 2008)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 9. **Electronic Communications Bill, 2025** *(replaces Act 775, 2008)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 10. **Electronic Transactions Bill, 2025** *(replaces Electronic Transactions Act 2008)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 11. **Data Protection Bill, 2025** *(replaces Act 843, 2012)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 12. **Cybersecurity (Amendment) Bill, 2025** *(amends Act 1038, 2020)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 13. **National Information Technology Authority (NITA) Bill, 2025** 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 14. **Postal, Courier & Logistics Services Commission Bill, 2025** *(replaces Act 649, 2003)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…) 15. **Ghana Meteorological Authority Bill, 2025** *(replaces Act 682, 2004)* 🔗 [Download PDF](moc.gov.gh/wp-content/upl…

“Tech is making waves” Rwanda: Wow, then let’s create an enabling ecosystem for techies. Ghana: Perfect way to retard the ordinary tech guy. Let’s introduce licenses and certifications. For a country that can’t guarantee its citizens a simple job? Next joke please!

@saintdannyyy Expect more from your leaders They serve you You don’t serve them Literally “Public Servants” it is in the name

You are using Lorem Ipsum on your website, and you're trying to charge me 20k for "license"? A whole government website. Supposed ICT Authority. Scrap the whole organisation. What a flipping joke.

Regulation by Invoicing: The Systemic Flaws in NITA’s Licensing Push and the Threat to Ghana’s Digital Trust By John Sitsofe Mensah , Technology Policy Analyst, IMANI. 9 mins read The architecture of a nation’s digital economy relies entirely on the integrity of its regulatory frameworks. When the rules governing technological innovation are clear, predictable, and legally sound, Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) thrives, and digital trust is established. However, when regulatory bodies bypass foundational legislation in favor of administrative bootstrapping, the entire ecosystem is placed at risk. The recent push by the National Information Technology Agency (NITA) to mandate licenses for individual ICT professionals and general private tech businesses presents a textbook case of regulatory overreach. By leaning on the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2022, and its subsequent 2023 Regulations to justify this sweep, NITA is attempting to extract a substantive regulatory mandate out of a consolidated financial instrument. A rigorous analysis of the underlying issues, laws, and frameworks surrounding this development reveals structural legal contradictions, a glaring historical legislative void, and a reactive regulatory posture that threatens to stifle local innovation and erode the very digital trust the agency was established to protect. *The Foundational Blueprint: Strict Statutory Boundaries* To understand the current friction, one must examine the original 2008 regulatory architecture. NITA was established by the National Information Technology Agency Act, 2008 (Act 771), with a companion framework provided by the Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772). These laws were designed with a specific, corporate-focused regulatory intent: - Infrastructure over Individuals: NITA was tasked with regulating the "provision" of ICT, managing networks, and ensuring quality of service at the enterprise level. - Strict Licensing Limitations: Act 772 explicitly limits NITA’s certification powers to highly sensitive corporate services, specifically encryption and authentication. - The Individual Prohibition: Most crucially, Section 38(1) of Act 772 contains an unambiguous, specific prohibition: "A licence shall not be issued or granted by the Agency to an individual." Under the 2008 framework, a data analyst or software developer simply utilizing ICT infrastructure to practice their trade operates entirely outside NITA’s licensing purview. *The Legislative Void and the Pivot to "Regulation by Invoicing"* To operationalize a primary Act—especially one establishing a "Certifying Agency" with highly technical mandates—a detailed Legislative Instrument (LI) is legally required. Despite multiple drafts circulating over the years, no comprehensive, sector-specific LIs were ever formally enacted to operationalize NITA’s broad statutory mandates under the 2008 Acts. Without an operational LI, NITA found itself holding broad enabling legislation but completely lacking the subsidiary legal tools required to actually execute its mandate. This legislative vacuum directly explains the agency's current reliance on the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2022. By sliding pricing schedules for "IT Professional Licenses" and broad business certifications into a general financial instrument, the agency engaged in administrative bootstrapping—hoping the authorization to collect a fee would be interpreted as the legal mandate to establish the regulatory regime itself. This approach is legally flawed: - The Fallacy of Revenue as Regulation: The Fees and Charges Act is a consolidated national pricing catalog. Passing a financial schedule that sets a price tag for a "Software Developer Certification" does not magically grant the agency the substantive legal authority to create or enforce that professional guild. Pricing does not equal permission. - Hierarchy of Laws: A fundamental rule of statutory interpretation dictates that general laws cannot implicitly repeal specific laws. A line item buried in a general fees schedule cannot override the explicit prohibition against individual licensing found in Section 38(1) of Act 772. *The Fallacy of the IT Guild: Why State Gatekeeping is Needless* While legislative integrity demands that any move to regulate human capital must occur through rigorous primary legislation, we must ask a more fundamental question: Should the state be licensing IT professionals at all? Attempting to shoehorn the tech sector into a traditional, state-mandated professional guild is a profound misunderstanding of how the global digital economy operates. Creating a mandatory IT guild is entirely needless for two core reasons: - Global Standards Already Exist: The IT sector is inherently borderless and already governed by rigorous, globally recognized standards. International certification systems—ranging from vendor-neutral accreditations like CISSP, CompTIA, and ISACA to vendor-specific credentials from AWS, Cisco, and Microsoft—are continuously updated to reflect the bleeding edge of technology. A localized, state-run certification system cannot hope to outpace or out-rigor these global benchmarks. Rather than mandating a redundant local license, policy should encourage and perhaps subsidize the acquisition of these internationally recognized credentials. - The Meritocracy of Self-Taught Knowledge: Unlike medicine or law, the tech ecosystem thrives on decentralized learning and the open-source movement. A developer's competence is proven by their code repositories, their problem-solving logic, and their deployment history, not by a state-issued piece of paper. The sector is famously meritocratic, heavily relying on brilliant, self-taught innovators. Erecting a mandatory guild system risks disenfranchising these self-taught experts, creating artificial barriers to entry that will ultimately starve the local industry of talent. *The Path Forward: Fostering Enablement Over Gatekeeping* In 1865, as the first motorized vehicles emerged, the British Parliament panicked. To maintain control over a disruptive new technology, they passed the Locomotive Act—famously known as the "Red Flag Act." It required every motorized vehicle to be preceded by a man walking on foot, waving a red flag to warn pedestrians. While intended to create order, the law effectively strangled the British automobile industry in its crib, allowing nations with more enabling frameworks to leapfrog them. Today, attempting to force the modern, decentralized IT sector into a localized, state-mandated licensing guild is the digital equivalent of the Red Flag Act. It imposes analog constraints on a purely digital frontier. Furthermore, in structural engineering, there is an unforgiving truth: you cannot build a skyscraper on a foundation poured for a bungalow. You can add as many floors as you like, and you can paint the facade to look modern, but eventually, the structural reality will assert itself, and the edifice will collapse. The exact same principle applies to regulatory frameworks. A regulatory regime built on the fragile foundation of a pricing catalog will inevitably fracture under the weight of actual enforcement and legal scrutiny. To foster innovation and build enduring digital trust, Ghana does not need to mandate professional guilds via invoices. We require: Regulatory Clarity: Agencies must operate strictly within the bounds of their enabling Acts. - Incentivizing Global Competence: The state should encourage the use of rigorous, existing international certifications to raise the national skill floor, rather than forcing practitioners into a localized licensing trap. - Transparent Recourse Mechanisms: The industry needs mandatory performance metrics and operational data publication from regulators to ensure accountability and prevent administrative overreach. If Ghana is to build a secure, effective, and globally competitive digital economy, its regulatory foundation must be grounded in robust law and an architecture of enablement, not merely in a schedule of fees. John Sitsofe Mensah is a Technology Policy Analyst with IMANI. @JoyNewsOnTV @Joy997FM @Nuetey @Citi973 @Channel1TVGHA @STARRNEWS @starr1035fm @NiiMoiThompson @mocghana @samgeorgegh @Graphicgh @utvghana @starr1035fm @tv3_ghana @radiogold905fm @3fm927 @AccraFM1005 @gbcnews_ @ghonetv @Citi973 @Ghanaian_Times @Adomonline @onua951fm @OnuaTV @Peace1043fm @LuvFM995

All the media personalities pretending not to see what is going on with the NITA Bill, don’t relax too much. There is a special digital bill for your workplace too. When it reaches your side, don’t come and explain democracy to us. Don’t think you’ll be spared wai 🤝

Pass a bill mandating that 95% of all state funded technology contracts go to or through Ghanaian companies on merit. Open tender. Published online. No back room deals. No friends and family. That is the bill we need.

We wish to inform the general public and all stakeholders that the proposed X Space discussion on the new NITA Bill has been rescheduled. 🗓️ New Date: Tuesday, 26th May 2026 ⏰ Time: 1:00 PM GMT The rescheduling is to allow for broader /1

@ekowreel @NITAGhana @samgeorgegh @TheDumbTechGuy @koboateng @kwekutech @NaaAnyoko @Legaltec_lounge @DevCongress @TechLabari @AccraDigiDigest Step in the right direction 👍

@NITAGhana @samgeorgegh @TheDumbTechGuy @koboateng @kwekutech @NaaAnyoko @Legaltec_lounge @DevCongress @pazunre @TechLabari @AccraDigiDigest Chale, the fact that they engage on x with us alone is commendable. Lets show up in our numbers!

@NITAGhana kindly publish your white paper that advised this bill. We want to understand the problems and opportunities identified in the digital sector and how your recommended regulations will fix it. @AccraDigiDigest