Adalbert_sir

@LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_ BANNED, BLOCKED, PAYOUT DENIED, REJECTED AND ACCOUNT CANCELLED. I never wanted to make a public post like this, but after what happened with my @InstantFunding_ accounts, I believe prop firm traders deserve transparency. My accounts were terminated, payouts rejected ($12k+), all related accounts breached, and I was permanently banned over alleged “copy trading” and “shared IP” violations. However, I do NOT accept these allegations as justified, especially considering how the entire situation was handled. The alleged violations were supposedly detected months earlier, yet: - no warning was issued, - no clarification was requested, - no restriction was applied, - and I was still allowed to continue trading and purchasing additional accounts normally. FACTS TO CONSIDER: 1. If the alleged violation was detected on March 2, 2026, why was I not notified immediately instead of being allowed to continue trading for months? 2. If this was truly considered a serious breach, why were my accounts allowed to remain active, profitable, and payout-eligible until significant profits were generated? 3. Why were newly purchased accounts also breached even though they were opened after the alleged incident and had no prior warning or investigation communicated to me? 4. Why was there no prior manual review, clarification request, or trader communication before rejecting all payouts, breaching all accounts, and applying a permanent platform ban? At this point, it honestly feels like the company simply wanted to remove a highly profitable trader rather than resolve the matter fairly and transparently. What makes the situation even worse: - I was removed and blocked from the Discord community, - blocked from further communication, - and denied access after requesting fairness and clarification. Is this really how profitable traders are treated? I fully respect the need for prop firms to enforce rules and protect their business. But enforcement without transparency, communication, or timely action destroys trust between traders and firms. I am publicly requesting that the CEO and management team review this case fairly and release the profits I genuinely worked for. Any further discussions about policy interpretations can happen afterward. Trust is everything in the prop firm industry. And honestly, platforms like PropFirmMatch ( @PFMSupport )also have a responsibility to help build transparency and trust in this space, because many traders trusted companies like Instant Funding through the reputation and exposure those platforms helped create. I am sharing this publicly so other prop traders can understand the risks involved and so the company can hopefully improve its review and enforcement process moving forward. Please @PropFirmMatch review the screenshot bellow for approval my claim.👇👇👇👇 @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmsCmpd @propfirms @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF @Khldfx @LewisAquaFunded @FundedNext @FundedHive @Abisheckraj7 @astucefx @garrytan @ifcryptocom @payoutjunction @Ssandar3 @AveMisha @GeorgeInstant @wannabechamp @avikkfp @PropTradeSavvy

Exercise for better health #sport #forex #investing #viral #trend

Lewis CEO PLEAE GIVE ME MY +12K USD . @LewisM_IF @Khldfx @InstantFunding_ @Alpha_Futures_ @AlphaCapitalUK @GoatFunded @SharkFundedfirm @Pipstonecapital @theMMXMtrader @FortuneMMXM @JeRRyMMXM @1111Crypto_ @DumbMoneyHunter @Khldfx @rdrsmc @vedictrades @ishaansaini22 @collapse_FX @ICT_Concepts @PropFinderApp @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmsCmpd @propfirms @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF @Khldfx @LewisAquaFunded @FundedNext @FundedHive @Abisheckraj7 @astucefx @garrytan @ifcryptocom @payoutjunction @Ssandar3 @AveMisha @GeorgeInstant @wannabechamp @avikkfp @PropTradeSavvy

FACTS TO CONSIDER: 1. If the alleged violation was detected on March 2, 2026, why was I not notified immediately instead of being allowed to continue trading for months? 2. If this was truly considered a serious breach, why were my accounts allowed to remain active, profitable, and payout-eligible until significant profits were generated? 3. Why were newly purchased accounts also breached even though they were opened after the alleged incident and had no prior warning or investigation communicated to me? 4. Why was there no prior manual review, clarification request, or trader communication before rejecting all payouts, breaching all accounts, and applying a permanent platform ban? At this point, it honestly feels like the company simply wanted to remove a highly profitable trader rather than resolve the matter fairly and transparently @Alpha_Futures_ @AlphaCapitalUK @GoatFunded @SharkFundedfirm @Pipstonecapital @theMMXMtrader @FortuneMMXM @JeRRyMMXM @1111Crypto_ @DumbMoneyHunter @Khldfx @rdrsmc @vedictrades @ishaansaini22 @collapse_FX @ICT_Concepts @PropFinderApp @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmsCmpd @propfirms @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF @Khldfx @LewisAquaFunded @FundedNext @FundedHive @Abisheckraj7 @astucefx @garrytan @ifcryptocom @payoutjunction @Ssandar3 @AveMisha @GeorgeInstant @wannabechamp @avikkfp @PropTradeSavvy

@LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_ BANNED, BLOCKED, PAYOUT DENIED, REJECTED AND ACCOUNT CANCELLED. I never wanted to make a public post like this, but after what happened with my @InstantFunding_ accounts, I believe prop firm traders deserve transparency. My accounts were terminated, payouts rejected ($12k+), all related accounts breached, and I was permanently banned over alleged “copy trading” and “shared IP” violations. However, I do NOT accept these allegations as justified, especially considering how the entire situation was handled. The alleged violations were supposedly detected months earlier, yet: - no warning was issued, - no clarification was requested, - no restriction was applied, - and I was still allowed to continue trading and purchasing additional accounts normally. FACTS TO CONSIDER: 1. If the alleged violation was detected on March 2, 2026, why was I not notified immediately instead of being allowed to continue trading for months? 2. If this was truly considered a serious breach, why were my accounts allowed to remain active, profitable, and payout-eligible until significant profits were generated? 3. Why were newly purchased accounts also breached even though they were opened after the alleged incident and had no prior warning or investigation communicated to me? 4. Why was there no prior manual review, clarification request, or trader communication before rejecting all payouts, breaching all accounts, and applying a permanent platform ban? At this point, it honestly feels like the company simply wanted to remove a highly profitable trader rather than resolve the matter fairly and transparently. What makes the situation even worse: - I was removed and blocked from the Discord community, - blocked from further communication, - and denied access after requesting fairness and clarification. Is this really how profitable traders are treated? I fully respect the need for prop firms to enforce rules and protect their business. But enforcement without transparency, communication, or timely action destroys trust between traders and firms. I am publicly requesting that the CEO and management team review this case fairly and release the profits I genuinely worked for. Any further discussions about policy interpretations can happen afterward. Trust is everything in the prop firm industry. And honestly, platforms like PropFirmMatch ( @PFMSupport )also have a responsibility to help build transparency and trust in this space, because many traders trusted companies like Instant Funding through the reputation and exposure those platforms helped create. I am sharing this publicly so other prop traders can understand the risks involved and so the company can hopefully improve its review and enforcement process moving forward. Please @PropFirmMatch review the screenshot bellow for approval my claim.👇👇👇👇 @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmsCmpd @propfirms @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF @Khldfx @LewisAquaFunded @FundedNext @FundedHive @Abisheckraj7 @astucefx @garrytan @ifcryptocom @payoutjunction @Ssandar3 @AveMisha @GeorgeInstant @wannabechamp @avikkfp @PropTradeSavvy

@LewisM_IF YOU WILL REJECT TRADERS PAYOUT , BAN HUGE AMOUNT AND BLOCK WHEN TRADERS ARE PROFITABLE? I can't say instantfunding company is not Good at all corners but they do bad for traders when it comes to payout, I reached on my big payout amount ever and got blocked, banned rejected and all account canselled due to reasons happened in March as they stated in they approach message. CEO lewis , why you blocked me, why you did at my $12k+ payout? Why sir? You need to keep survive at my sweat? Brothers and sisters if this campany can't even consider this fact below 👇, then you are not safe too. FACTS TO CONSIDER: 1. If the alleged violation was detected on March 2, 2026, why was I not notified immediately instead of being allowed to continue trading for months? 2. If this was truly considered a serious breach, why were my accounts allowed to remain active, profitable, and payout-eligible until significant profits were generated? 3. Why were newly purchased accounts also breached even though they were opened after the alleged incident and had no prior warning or investigation communicated to me? 4. Why was there no prior manual review, clarification request, or trader communication before rejecting all payouts, breaching all accounts, and applying a permanent platform ban?

FACTS TO CONSIDER: If the alleged violation was detected on March 2, 2026, why was I not notified immediately instead of being allowed to continue trading for months? If this was truly considered a serious breach, why were my accounts allowed to remain active, profitable, and payout-eligible until significant profits were generated? Why were newly purchased accounts also breached even though they were opened after the alleged incident and had no prior warning or investigation communicated to me? Why was there no prior manual review, clarification request, or trader communication before rejecting all payouts, breaching all accounts, and applying a permanent platform ban? At this point, it honestly feels like the company simply wanted to remove a highly profitable trader rather than resolve the matter fairly and transparently. @theMMXMtrader @FortuneMMXM @JeRRyMMXM @1111Crypto_ @DumbMoneyHunter @Khldfx @rdrsmc @vedictrades @ishaansaini22 @collapse_FX @ICT_Concepts @PropFinderApp @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMatch @PropFirmMedia @PropFirmsCmpd @propfirms @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF @Khldfx @LewisAquaFunded @FundedNext @FundedHive @Abisheckraj7 @astucefx @garrytan @ifcryptocom @payoutjunction @Ssandar3 @AveMisha @GeorgeInstant @wannabechamp @avikkfp @PropTradeSavvy

@Abisheckraj7 @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF @collapse_FX @FXCK932 @BlazeMMXM @deva_mmxm @vedictrades @ishaansaini22 @PropTradeSavvy @Maventrading They banned me and rejected $12k+ in pending payout

Scam alert 🚨 🚨🚨🚨 @InstantFunding_ scammer 🚨🚨 @LewisM_IF scammer 🚨🚨🚨 2nd payout rejected Guys, recently I bought a funded account from an instant funding company called IF Micro. I traded only one trade per day for 5 days — overall just 5 trades in total. After requesting my payout, my second payout got rejected. They are saying it was “one-sided betting.” How is that possible when I only took one trade per day? I am only trade in gold if gold selling. I see only sell trade so how I can enter the buy trade in sell market. 🚨🚨 If needed, I’m ready to explain every trade I took and why rejecting my second payout for this reason makes no sense. @theMMXMtrader @FortuneMMXM @JeRRyMMXM @1111Crypto_ @DumbMoneyHunter @Khldfx @rdrsmc @vedictrades @ishaansaini22 @collapse_FX @ICT_Concepts @PropFinderApp @PropFirmMatch

@Abisheckraj7 @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF Bro, trade responsible to all rules published to the company website FAQs regarding to account modals, I guarantee you will received payout approved. Look tomorrow I will get $9400 from payout

And finally, I got paid out from @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF, and there was no warning at all. But I still have some questions. Question 1: Who is working on your risk team? I’m asking because it feels like your risk team has zero real trading knowledge. They only look at sell or buy direction without understanding actual market trading. Even traders with one year of experience would understand this better. Question 2: Who created the auto-reject robot/system in your company? That system also seems to have zero trading knowledge. It may make sense to detect one-sided trading on lower timeframes like 1-hour or 4-hour charts. But if I take only one sell trade per month for five months — just five trades total — and you still call that one-sided betting, that is ridiculous. It makes no sense. Question 3: This is for the owner of the company. If you truly want to grow into a trusted funding company like FTMO, then trust is the most valuable thing. Don’t reject traders unfairly. Copy the good standards, not bad practices. And understand one thing. A good trader — someone disciplined and skilled — may see a funded account as their last chance to change their life. Some traders work for years just to get one opportunity. If you support real traders fairly, they will trust your company. They will promote your platform, share your website, support your team, and help your brand grow naturally. But when payouts get rejected for cheap reasons like this, people will start questioning your company. Social media is public. Everyone can see how you treat traders, and it damages trust in your brand. If an auto-robot rejects payouts incorrectly, then your risk team should manually review and verify the case properly. That is their responsibility. A real risk team should understand trading before making serious decisions. I know you may not reply to this, but I’m sure your team will see it. I think you seriously need to review your risk team because they are damaging the reputation of your company. The decisions they are making show a lack of real trading knowledge. Even the person who created this auto-reject system seems to have no proper understanding of trading behavior. If this continues, one day your company will gain a very bad reputation in the trading community. Trust is everything in this industry, and once people lose trust, it is very hard to recover. A company’s name is built over years, but bad decisions can destroy that reputation very quickly. Traders never forget how they were treated. And one more thing — I already posted that your company looks like a scam, and I will not remove that post. Once something is posted online, it stays there permanently. That becomes your company’s problem, not mine. I never wanted things to reach this level. If traders are treated fairly and payouts are handled properly, there is no reason for people to speak against your company publicly. But if these kinds of unfair actions continue with other traders too, more people will speak up. If traders tag me and share similar experiences, I will also come forward and explain exactly what happened today. Trust is everything in this industry, and traders never forget how they were treated.

@FundedHive Mt5 mt5 mt5

What do you think FundedHive is still missing? 🐝 We’re building Hive for traders, with traders. Your feedback, ideas, and suggestions help us improve every part of the experience 📈 Drop the one feature, improvement, or change you’d love to see next at FundedHive 👇🔥

@Krishana_xau @FundedHive 200%

@FundedHive FundedHive is most innovative and traders friendly propfirm... I can clearly see this prop firm future... In next 2 years your the no.1 in the industry

The prop firm industry needs innovation. 👀 Profitable traders deserve more than just payouts… they deserve more ways to monetize their skill, track record, and consistency. 📈 Something big is being built at Hive behind the scenes. 🐝🔥 The next evolution of prop trading is closer than you think.

@InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF My account 8090977 was cancelled and $4,301 payout denied over a trade that lost only -$724 (0.72%) on a $100k account. Decision based on an unstated “execution-time SL rule” not in public rules. I want a justice from you. Thanks @LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_

This week has been packed with action: from major economic events to 3 brand new Instant Funding launches, and our traders didn't waste a second 🔥 Congratulations! 🎉

@InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF My account 8090977 was cancelled and $4,301 payout denied over a trade that lost only -$724 (0.72%) on a $100k account. Decision based on an unstated “execution-time SL rule” not in public rules. I want a justice from you. Thanks @LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_

Team, we're officially 82,000+ traders strong 💜 When we started building Instant Funding, clear rules, lower prices, real transparency, we had no idea what the community would look like. Today, it's you. 82,000+ of you, from every corner of the globe. Thank you for being here. The best is still ahead 😉

@InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF My account 8090977 was cancelled and $4,301 payout denied over a trade that lost only -$724 (0.72%) on a $100k account. Decision based on an unstated “execution-time SL rule” not in public rules. I want a justice from you. Thanks @LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_

3 days left ⏳ Code GIFT275 to get 33% off + a reward you pick: 33% off your next purchase, 35 PlusPoints, or a free IF1 account up to $5,000 🎁 Your move. Use GIFT275 🚀

@InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF My account 8090977 was cancelled and $4,301 payout denied over a trade that lost only -$724 (0.72%) on a $100k account. Decision based on an unstated “execution-time SL rule” not in public rules. I want a justice from you. Thanks @LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_

Here's some magic of numbers for you: 33% off, 3 ways to win. If you've been hesitating, consider this your sign 🪄 Use code GIFT275, and pick a reward that fits your next move: 🎁 Going big? Take 33% off your next purchase — that's where the savings stack up most 🎁 Want flexibility? 35 PlusPoints save you up to 50% on a future order 🎁 Got your eyes on a free $5,000 IF1? A $50K IF Micro is a community favorite available at $214 with the 33% off Your choice. Use GIFT275.

@LewisM_IF @LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_ My account 8090977 was cancelled and $4,301 payout denied over a trade that lost only -$724 (0.72%) on a $100k account. Decision based on an unstated “execution-time SL rule” not in public rules. I want a justice from you. Thanks @LewisM_IF

Thoughts?

Has anyone heard of these sprint accounts? You get an account for like 2, 4 or 8 hours long 0.5% max loss, profit target is something 2.5% If you reach 2.5%, you get that profit immediately. $25k challenge for around $100 & $10k challenge for around $60 Thats $625 profit on a $25k Would you buy this? whats your thoughts? Is this controversial to trading?

@LewisM_IF @LewisM_IF My account 8090977 was cancelled and $4,301 payout denied over a trade that lost only -$724 (0.72%) on a $100k account. Decision based on an unstated “execution-time SL rule” not in public rules. I want a justice from you. Thanks @LewisM_IF @InstantFunding_

@InstantFunding_ Thanks again for this. @InstantFunding_ @LewisM_IF did professional work for me. I liked you @InstantFunding_ team

Five traders. Five countries. $67,000+ in top payouts in March 🌍 This is what our community looks like in motion. Congrats to the top five, and to everyone who got paid this month. You know who you are 🔥

@InstantFunding_ You pay bro. Thanks

Almost $1,000,000. One month. Team, you are insane 🔥 April's leaderboard is still blank. What are you waiting for? Make your mark.

@Jaaphar_mhd @InstantFunding_ They deserve it, I got best experience from them.

@InstantFunding_ Traders believe in you let continue grinding

Hey team. We need to talk. You may have noticed that something’s… gone. Two-Phase Max is no longer on our website 🥀 That’s not an accident. We're building something new, but we're not ready to share details yet. When we are, you'll hear it first. In the meantime — if you're thinking about picking up an account, now's a good time. GIFT275 gives you 33% off, and every purchase earns 10% back in PlusPoints. Stack them now. You might want them later 👀 More soon ⏳