Agent Braise

15.3K posts

Agent Braise banner
Agent Braise

Agent Braise

@AgentBraise

21 years old, art and level design, socialist. My tweets are just an incoherent train of thought.

Missouri, USA Katılım Kasım 2017
1.9K Takip Edilen109 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Agent Braise
Agent Braise@AgentBraise·
Just a reminder that there's nothing "cute" or "quirky" about not following me.
English
0
0
1
0
Agent Braise retweetledi
Adrian
Adrian@ShinySlurpuffs·
I just dont understand why the world is getting so unbearable. Why isnt anyone fucking doing anything about it. What the fuck do you mean the US government can destroy random packages for the crime of being from Japan. Corporate greed, obviously, but. Why. Its all so pointless
English
15
356
3.3K
30.1K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Agent Braise retweetledi
Ratamon 💾
Ratamon 💾@RANK10YGO·
Calling yourself a fan of games without playing them is dumb, but hating a game without playing it is my god given right you can't take away
English
112
1.9K
20K
250.6K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Angel Ramirez
Angel Ramirez@angrloo198·
Apparently everyone is poor as fuck have every disability and are against piracy but still have the time to watch gameplays
English
23
523
9.2K
86.1K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Jeffrey Peel
Jeffrey Peel@JeffreyPeel·
This is important to note. Governments can't shut down VPNs just as they can't shut down the internet. If they attempt to ban the use of VPNs they'll be sued. The evidence from Australia is that under-16s will be easily able to bypass age restrictions on social media. Government attempts to force adults to provide personal information or biometrics to use Twitter or Facebook will fail. The backlash against these absurd proposals will be devastating for the government and the other political brands that support them. The government needs to wise up...and soon.
Alex Klaushofer@alexklaushofer

@andrew_lilico

English
35
123
582
17.2K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Giga Puddi
Giga Puddi@AoiAmore·
I remember reading about how many of the younger gens have no ambition, no intellectual curiosity, etc. It adds up. They just want to doomscroll social media while some youtuber plays a game in the background. Sad. And when confronted with it they give you a list of cope.
˖ ݁✦☾ woke gloomy ☾✦ ݁˖@gnlune

many reasons 1. accessibility 1a. money 1b. age 1c. platform/device 1d. region 1e. game is not on market 2. enjoyment 2a. game is more story than gameplay 2b. gameplay is lackluster/not necessary 3. previewing before buying 4. etc who are you to be policing?

English
15
311
3.2K
66.3K
Agent Braise retweetledi
GhostRade
GhostRade@GhostRade·
Dudes with bad computers used to play Source games at an unstable 15fps on low settings asking their buddies to hop on Counter-Strike or some bullshit Garry’s Mod game mode, now they play bootleg Roblox games and think emulating San Andreas is gonna brick their PC
English
45
366
3.1K
97.2K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Amazon Piss Jugs
Amazon Piss Jugs@JeremyWard33·
The billionaires did this. They are your mortal enemies. It's truly them or the planet y'all. You decide
Amazon Piss Jugs tweet media
English
55
4.2K
18K
99.2K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Ginny
Ginny@GinnyA24601·
We all have to say no to digital ID. Or it’s game over. I already miss the world I knew. I don’t want to live in the world they have planned. Do you?
English
78
666
3.2K
21K
Agent Braise retweetledi
DulceBiatch
DulceBiatch@BiatchDulce·
🔔ICYMI: A controversial deal in the U.S. could fundamentally rewrite internet freedom as we know it. The congressional deal would trade the deregulation of artificial intelligence for unprecedented federal censorship powers. A high-stakes compromise is quietly brewing in Washington as the White House negotiates with congressional leaders to fundamentally reshape the digital landscape. Under the proposed deal reported by Axios, the federal government would strip states of their authority to regulate artificial intelligence—effectively halting progressive state-level efforts to hold tech companies accountable and restrict energy-heavy AI data centers. In exchange, lawmakers would push through three major federal censorship bills: the Kids Online Safety Act, the NO FAKES Act, and a federal online age verification mandate. While framed as common-sense protections for minors, civil liberties advocates warn these measures represent an unprecedented expansion of federal control over online speech. The backlash to this legislative trade-off cuts across typical political lines. Even conservative-backed organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) have issued stark warnings, declaring that the package would dismantle the internet as we know it by empowering the Federal Trade Commission to dictate acceptable online speech. Opponents argue that enforcing these rules would effectively eliminate online anonymity, while giving the administration an incredibly powerful tool to censor dissenting political views and control what users see on major platforms like Instagram. As the White House maneuvers to secure congressional backing, Americans are left facing a troubling dilemma: the long-sought-after regulation of big tech and AI may come at the direct cost of their fundamental constitutional rights to free expression. Source: Wilkins, J. (2026). Trump Moves to Deeply Censor the Entire Internet. Futurism.
DulceBiatch tweet media
English
304
1.8K
2.9K
697.5K
Agent Braise retweetledi
「Hi-Tech Lo-Life」
「Hi-Tech Lo-Life」@HiTechLoLife1·
Speaking as a former poor kid. Any device you can freely watch YouTube on or tweet from is enough to run some of the greatest games ever made via emulation. And quite frankly you don't need to always be playing the latest games.
Danny@Dannt_Em

"just emulate bro" most modern games have such big specs that getting a device to run them is already an undertaking and second sure i'm going to risk bricking my only phone/pc just because i don't want to be called a larper

English
10
151
1.6K
18.4K
Agent Braise retweetledi
flanthippe
flanthippe@flanthippe·
It's anti-art to use a save state at the password screen of an NES game to save your progress instead of having to write it down.
English
9
24
347
10.3K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Chris Heatherly
Chris Heatherly@chrisheatherly·
I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.
Seán Ako 🇮🇪@TheAkoFiles

My first instinct was to support the UK’s social media ban for under 16s. Protecting children from grooming, exploitation and harmful content seems like common sense. But I’m seeing a lot of opposition to it, so I’m genuinely curious as to why? One thing making me second guess is that platforms like bluesky are exempt, while at the same time there’s a push to let 16 year olds vote. To me that looks less like child protection and more like controlling where young people get their information. Interested to hear other perspectives.

English
154
5.4K
21K
827.8K
Agent Braise retweetledi
Mekhanicheskiy Frantsuz
Mekhanicheskiy Frantsuz@boris_molotov·
old people activating the neuron pathway that turns them into a kamikaze against young people
Kingdom of Cycling@Cycling_Kingdom

🚨 Wth?! 😱 An older spectator caused a seriously dangerous incident today at #SaarlandTrofeoJuniors by trying to get a better look and entering the course with her rollator while riders were flying past at full speed! #LVMSaarlandTrofeo #Habkirchen #Saarland #Germany #Cycling

English
7
486
12.4K
202.1K