Akash

arrest everyone

Adidas just mass-released a $500 running shoe that is banned from every sanctioned race on the planet. And it sold out in minutes. The business logic is smarter than it looks. World Athletics caps stack height at 40mm for road racing shoes. The Prime X Evo sits at 50mm. That extra 10mm of Lightstrike Pro Evo foam means the shoe physically cannot be worn in any official competition. Adidas printed that fact on the marketing materials. They're selling illegality as a feature. The shoe helped Sibusiso Kubheka run 100km in 5:59:20, the first person to ever break six hours at that distance. A record that does not count in any official record book because the shoe violates the rules. Adidas spent years of R&D to break a record that technically doesn't exist. Here's why that's the play. The Prime X Evo isn't the product. The Prime X Evo is the commercial for the product. Every running publication on Earth wrote about this shoe for free. Millions in earned media. The actual revenue shoe is the Adizero Adios Pro 4 at $250, which uses a legal version of the same foam technology, sits under the 40mm limit, and ships in real quantities. The $500 price tag and lottery release aren't margin optimization. They're a scarcity engine that turns a running shoe into a streetwear drop. You're buying a concept car that happens to fit on your feet. Adidas found the loophole: you can build whatever you want if you never claim it's for competition. The regulations assumed shoe companies wanted to win races. Adidas realized winning the marketing race pays better.

there are some things that are only impressive because they came from two human hands

The pope is right.

Making a person feel loved is more important than telling them you love them.

Keep it simple‼️

Good art and architecture are a kind of optimism.

I try not to get intimidated by intelligent people, I listen to them and learn from them instead. I genuinely love being around people I can learn from, truly smart people, not self acclaimed “smart” people who are just loud and arrogant. I admire intelligence because it inspires me to become better. I love the idea of continuously seeking knowledge, asking questions, observing, listening, and learning. I actually don’t mind seeming naive sometimes because it helps me gather more knowledge. I always want to know more, understand more, and grow more.

Genocide.

Participating just to cook juicers for an easy bag is genius

Russia got sanctioned by governments controlling Visa & Mastercard… and people are shocked Russia stopped depending on them? China built UnionPay for the exact same reason years ago. This is basic state logic, not a Marvel villain plot. But when Russia does something rational, suddenly people forget how geopolitics works.

Best Advice 💯

Bombay, 1885. In a courtroom, a 22-year-old woman listened as a man claimed he had a legal right to her. His name was Dadaji Bhikaji. According to the law, he was her husband. To her, however, he was nothing of the sort. Rukhmabai had been married at the age of eleven. The union had been arranged by her family, as was common for many girls in India at the time. After the wedding ceremony, she returned to live with her mother, expected to join her husband once she reached adulthood. But her life took a different path. After her stepfather's death, her mother married Dr. Sakharam Arjun, a progressive physician who believed in women's education. For the first time, Rukhmabai was given access to learning. She studied English, mathematics, and science, gaining an education that was exceptionally rare for a woman of her era. By the time she reached adulthood, she had made up her mind: she would not live with a man she had never chosen. Dadaji Bhikaji refused to accept her decision. In 1884, he filed a lawsuit seeking the restoration of his “conjugal rights,” asking the court to compel Rukhmabai to move in with him and fulfill the role of a wife. Her response was unequivocal. She did not recognize the marriage as valid. She had been a child, incapable of giving meaningful consent, and she regarded the man as a stranger. Her words caused outrage. In colonial India, child marriage was deeply entrenched in society and supported by long-standing traditions. Challenging the practice meant confronting social norms, religious authorities, and established customs. The case quickly became a national sensation. Newspapers across India and Britain reported on every development. Public opinion was sharply divided. Conservatives accused her of attacking tradition, while reformers saw her struggle as a fight for justice and personal freedom. Rukhmabai refused to remain silent. Writing under the pseudonym “A Hindoo Lady,” she published articles and letters in newspapers, condemning child marriage and criticizing a society that denied education to girls. She described the devastating impact that forced marriages had on the lives of young girls. One of her most famous letters, published in The Times of India in 1885, recounted how child marriage had affected her own life. The letter was reprinted widely and sparked debate far beyond India's borders. Yet public attention could not shield her from the law. In March 1887, the court delivered a harsh ruling. The judge ordered that Rukhmabai must either live with her husband or face six months in prison for contempt of court. Her answer came immediately. She would rather go to prison. The declaration shocked the public. A young woman willingly choosing imprisonment over submission to an unwanted marriage was almost unimaginable at the time. Reactions were swift and intense. Some newspapers attacked her relentlessly, while others rallied to her defense. The controversy reached the highest levels of the British colonial administration. Eventually, an out-of-court settlement was reached. Dadaji Bhikaji agreed to withdraw the case in exchange for financial compensation. Rukhmabai won the freedom she had fought so fiercely to protect. But her story did not end there. Her case had exposed a troubling reality: in India, the legal age of consent was only ten years old. Public pressure and reform campaigns helped bring about legislative change. In 1891, the age of consent was raised to twelve. Although still far too low by modern standards, it marked an important first step toward reform. Then came a new challenge. Determined to become a doctor, Rukhmabai pursued medical studies. After facing obstacles in India, she was admitted to the London School of Medicine for Women. With support from reformers and charitable organizations, she traveled to England to continue her education. She studied there for six years. In 1895, she returned to India as a qualified physician, becoming one of the country's first female doctors. The girl who had been forced into marriage at eleven had become a respected medical professional. For decades, she dedicated her life to treating women and children, improving women's healthcare, and advocating for girls' education. She never married again. When asked why, she reportedly replied with characteristic wit that she had already had enough experience of marriage to last a lifetime. Rukhmabai died in 1955 at the age of ninety-one, having witnessed profound changes in both India and the status of women. For many years, her name remained largely forgotten. Today, she is remembered as a pioneering figure whose courage helped pave the way for reforms in women's and children's rights. It all began in a courtroom, when a judge presented her with two choices: obey or go to prison. She chose freedom.

Zohran Mamdani is 34 years old. YOUNG PEOPLE CAN LEAD EFFECTIVELY. You don't have to be 70 with "life experience" to do a good job.

Spending more time with books than with people for almost half of a life turned out to be one of the greatest advantages for the second half of it.

South African scientists are leading an international team in working toward a food-secure future by developing better beans! Get the full story here: goodthingsguy.com/sa-scientists-…

BREAKING: Pope Leo XIV makes historic apology for Holy See's own role in legitimizing slavery and for failing to condemn it for centuries. apnews.com/article/pope-a…

UAE population ~1.15 crores Singapore population ~0.60 crores Maharashtra population ~12 crores Maharashtra may surpass Singapore or UAE in total GDP size because it has a population of 12+ crore people. Singapore has world-class roads, ports, governance, healthcare, and one of the highest per capita incomes in the world. UAE cities like Dubai and Abu Dhabi have globally recognized infrastructure and public services. If Maharashtra wants to truly match them, focus should be on: - Air pollution - Cleanliness - Traffic and urban planning - Public healthcare - Education quality - Corruption and bureaucracy - Job creation Crossing another economy in size is a headline. Improving people’s everyday lives is the real achievement.

🫶👋