Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Muslim 🇸🇩
3.7K posts
Muslim 🇸🇩
@Alelislam
Between Ahlul Sunnah and you Khawarij and Asha’irah are the books and Athar of the Salaf
Katılım Şubat 2022
88 Takip Edilen362 Takipçiler
If Nasir al Fahd, AMJ, OBL, Alwan etc
are Ahlul Sunnah may Allah kill me so that I dont see the blessed day of Arafah coming soon
If the Sunnah is with al-Albani and Ibn Baz and their students like AbdulAziz al-Rayyis may I see Arafah and be a real Tallib and guided worshipper
English
Ibn Hazm looked up to Ibn Abd al-Barr and used to write to him questions
He even said Kitab al-Tamhid was the best book written
Some say he studied under Ibn Abd al-Barr but this is disputed
ابن أبي زيد الهندي@wannabemuhadith
malikiyyah are scared of him
English
Khawarij doing this never even target important people
Even Kuffar have been shooting their CEOs and target people better AT LEAST
But you Jews kill random harmless poor people and civilians who have no power and cant harm nobody
It’s like 100% of you are dumb or something!
English
How does a “shaykh” make Takfir on referees for koora 😂 thats not ever Haram forget Shirk what is up with Khawarij
So anyone who makes laws in any circumstance is a Kaffir a father a business man a teacher anyone with authority is a Kaffir
But theyre not Khawarij right
English
You guys should stop saying free Nasir al Fahd, if he was free and no longer in jail, you guys would have to declare him misguided, scholars must be in jail to be scholars!
Thoughts on making Takfir on those who referee a game of football? Takfir over something Mubah?
English
Whether you guys Like it or not, you can cope all you like the Maliki madhhab is one of the strongest madhhabs in Islamic history. It produced some of the greatest scholars in fiqh, kalam, usul, and hadith, such as al-Baqillani, Qadi iyad, al-Qarāfī, and al-baqillani
Even Abu hasan al-ashari was described as Maliki by scholars like Ibn asakir and Ibn farhun in their books.
And ibn Abi zayd was an ashari.
The madhhab was so influential that major scholars wrote books trying to refute it. Muhammad al-shaybani wrote al-hujjah Ala Ahl al-madinah against Maliki usul, yet maliki scholars answered back so strongly that qadi Ismail al-maliki reportedly wrote a reply close to 200 volumes.
This is why the Maliki madhhab mogs. Strong fiqh, strong usul, strong mutakallimun and centuries of scholarship. Talk to the hand.
English
@mjhdlover because based on your aqeedah you must takfir them but uthaymeen didnt so theres clearly a major manhaj difference between your scholars and ahlul sunnah
even your scholars takfired them but uthaymeen while knowing them
personally PRAISED them
English
@Alelislam Who’s talking about Saudi are you daft?
You’re the one coping cuz he clearly contradicts your false beliefs.
You can’t both be correct either he ( one of your five ) is correct or you and the madkhalis cult are.
His applying it a whole different topic.
English
You mean the same scholars you pick and choose what you take from?
Muslim 🇸🇩@Alelislam
This is why I say Khawarij have no Ulamah Everyone they look up to goes back to a group of scholars whom are the Jama’ah of this time (the big 5) But if you see theese scholars Manhaj in Takfir, Dawah, dealing with rulers, it closelyAl resembles our scholars, not theirs
English
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweetledi
What the brother posted is a translation of this page
Imam AbdulLatif bin AbdulRahman bin Hassan al-Najdi the teacher of Imam Muhammed bin Ibrahim
Gives examples of Tashree’ al-Aam and Tahkim and Tahakum and mentions it is KUFR DUNA KUFR unless they do Istihlal
Jad 🇸🇾@jado375
View of the Najdi Shaykh ʾAbd al-Laṭīf bin ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Āl al-Shaykh on making man-made laws a reference point (tahkim) abuiyaad.com/a/abd-al-latif…
English
@BrotherUnknown0 Im limited with like 20 words because i dont want to give elon 4 dollars
Muslim 🇸🇩@Alelislam
Muhammed bin Ibrahim VS AMJ AMJ: Saudi rulers ever since 1902 were Kuffar Imam Muhammed bin Ibrahim that Khawarij pretend to follow: Saudi RULES BY SHARIAH which was authored in 1979 His Manhaj was passed down from him till todays scholars who Khawarij call bootlickers
English
“The big 5”
Man categorized his scholars like the wildlife of Africa.
Muslim 🇸🇩@Alelislam
This is why I say Khawarij have no Ulamah Everyone they look up to goes back to a group of scholars whom are the Jama’ah of this time (the big 5) But if you see theese scholars Manhaj in Takfir, Dawah, dealing with rulers, it closelyAl resembles our scholars, not theirs
English
AMJ/Nasir al Fahd/Alwan are the jamaa’ah.
Muslim 🇸🇩@Alelislam
Since the time of Sahabah Khawarij never followed the Jama’ah and split from the scholars and Sahabah and followed misguided scholars instead That resembles today following people like AMJ/Nasir al Fahd/Alwan whos whole Manhaj is totally different from that of the major scholars
English
Since the time of Sahabah Khawarij never followed the Jama’ah and split from the scholars and Sahabah and followed misguided scholars instead
That resembles today following people like AMJ/Nasir al Fahd/Alwan whos whole Manhaj is totally different from that of the major scholars
English
The group of Ulamah every single person these guys look up to, have shortly studied under or looked up to these scholars making them the main branch of Ilm
Cut them off you cut off the Sanad to the rasul ﷺ in your Aqeedah & followed the Ruwaybida
Ilm is inherited not created
English
The Jahl of Khawarij
It means AhlulSunnah
Many Hadith explain there will always be a group upon truth and a Jama’ah (those following the companions in Aqeedah)
Imam Ahmed and Bukhari even explained the meaning of these Hadith to refer to AhlulHadith/scholars
أبو سدرة@slicingpaper
Since when do we label scholars are “the Jama’ah”????
English
@mjhdlover its the other way around, you will do anything to takfir muslims even if it means you must takfir scholars to stay cinsistent with your ruwaybida mashaykh
that is why many amj followers takfir ibn baz and their likes
English
@Alelislam It’s crazy how you’ll defend these tawagheet at the expense of your scholars.
English
Madkhalis really believe that Saudi scholars would declare their rulers to be kuffar if they believed so.. that’s how deluded they are.
As great as some of these scholars are it’s highly unlikely they would make takfeer of them as we saw what happened with Sheikh hamud al uqla.
mk@mk_muwahid
Ahmad Musa Jibril refuted by the one who he says is the most knowledgeable in ‘Aqidah alive today! It is truly astonishing that these people are upon a Manhaj without a single senior scholar ever preceding them. Rather they have blatantly opposed the Manhaj of the Imams of Najd, and I would love to speak about it in detail, but it is not my place.
English
Also AMJ fans have a lot of differing in Takfiring the scholars no point in showing a Tazkiyah of a scholar you dont even consider Muslim
And if Tazkiyas of Ibn Baz are a testimony to firmness then shaykh Rabee should be first since ibn baz even had him teach at his masjid
English
This is why I say Khawarij have no Ulamah
Everyone they look up to goes back to a group of scholars whom are the Jama’ah of this time (the big 5)
But if you see theese scholars Manhaj in Takfir, Dawah, dealing with rulers, it closelyAl resembles our scholars, not theirs
مسلم@FirmlyUponHaqq
Ibn Baz famous tazkiyah to Shaykh Ahmad Musa Jibril and his father حفظهما الله. "both of them are known to me for virtue, knowledge, good conduct, and activity in calling to Allah. I advise those sent on scholarship in America, and Muslims in general, to benefit from them."
English