Alex

923 posts

Alex banner
Alex

Alex

@AlexASchue

Tech company founder on machine lifecycle economics; fmr professor of politics/economics/statistics; once wrote about the political economy of expressive choice

New York, USA Katılım Temmuz 2015
1.6K Takip Edilen213 Takipçiler
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@mungowitz All that makes sense (now), but curious why “papers never made sense, anyway”, when working in an industry teaching to write academic papers?
English
1
0
1
160
Michael Munger 🏖️🔪👨‍🍳
I stopped assigning papers in 2016. All the assignments are video content. I give multiple in-class exams, with blue book essays. And I assign debates and in-class work, with videos of the "lectures" to be watched back in the dorm. Hot take: papers NEVER made sense, anyway.
Timur Kuran@timurkuran

AI just killed higher education’s old teaching model. We need smaller classes and oral defenses for every paper—implying more faculty time, hence more professors. Since banning AI is unenforceable, written work alone can no longer be trusted.

English
8
7
40
6K
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@MVJohnson Yes, I know, and you've had Zawinul and Pastorius on ML, too, so I was being appreciative when I mentioned Weather Report. I love the ML recommendations.
English
0
0
1
10
Martin
Martin@MVJohnson·
@AlexASchue I like Weather Report and saw them on the tour that resulted in that recording. Black Market was a ML choice a few weeks ago.
English
1
0
0
50
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
I was thinking of @MVJohnson today. Because I listen to his morning listening recommendations whenever I can. And then, earlier today, I listened to my all-time favorite album, Weather Report, 8:30. And think he should, too.
English
2
0
2
45
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@mungowitz It’s contrails. He’s trying to con us into thinking he’s a higher power.
English
1
0
1
23
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
No story feels as exciting as a long-established hard boundary melting away as if it had never existed. And no narrative as inspiring as an insider’s one explaining what it took to make this happen.
Steve Magness@stevemagness

What in the world did we just see! The 2 hour marathon barrier has been broken. Three guys went under the old world record... Sabastian Sawe just ran 1:59:30 with crazy negative splits, closing the last half in 59:01....faster than the American Record in the half. One of the most mind blowing performances we've seen. How did we get here? Every breakthrough is a mixture of belief and progress. It takes folks daring to see what's possible, surrounding themselves with a quality team and doing the work to give themselves a shot. You've got to bet on yourself in a big way. When asked whether he believed he could run a sub-2-hour marathon before the race, Sawe answered with one word: "Yes." Let's get the obvious out of the way. Performance enhancing drugs are the legitimate question mark to every breakthrough. So Sawe did as much as he could about taking that off the table. He and his team asked to be tested all the time. His sponsor put up 50K to the Athlete Integrity Unit. The tests are run independently, no advance notice. Over a 2 month stretch, he went through 25 drug tests. There's always a doubt. There has to be given what we know. Hopefully there's transparency in the results. But hats off to Sawe for addressing it: "I want to prove that I am clean when I set foot at the start line." But how'd we actually get here where two guys went sub 2 in the same race? 1. Shoe tech We've had a revolution in shoe technology that boosts running economy. For years shoe companies said their shoe would make you faster and was mostly marketing. Until 2016, when it actually did. Initial research showed a 3-4% saving in economy, while subsequent work has shown it's highly variable. Now, it's a matching game. Find the perfect shoe for your form and you can get a big boost. Normally, it takes years of lots of miles and strength training to boost economy. But now we get that instant boost that not only helps boost performance but often leaves us feeling less beat up in the later stages of the marathon. So we get a little bit less hitting of the wall... 2. The fuel For a long time, fueling was limited by biology. You can only take in and process so much. Then in the 2000s, researchers found if we mixed sugars, we can boost intake because they're processed differently. Then recently, Maurten found if you use a hydrxogel, you boost utilization without GI distress anymore. We've gone from pushing 60g/hr to 120g/hr in a few decades. Again...less bonking. 3. Depth A few decades ago, you spent your career racing on the track and then once your speed started to fade a bit you went to the marathon. Now, many skip right to the marathon. That's where the money is. And with the economy boost from the shoes, you can make that jump quickly. More depth of talent means more competitors in their prime pushing barriers. 4. Belief Even with the shoes and tech, a few years ago sub 2 hours seemed a long way off, until Kipchoge pushed that barrier in a series of time trials. Yes, they weren't official races and had contrived pacing. But it absolutely shifted everyone's thinking on what is possible. A generation of runners saw Kipchoge go for it. Our prediction of what is possible changed. It's mind blowing how far we've come in such a short time. What once seemed decades away, just got smashed twice in the same race. Hats off to Sawe, especially for addressing the scourge of doping and showing folks what is possible with a lot of hard work, some crazy belief, and some fortuitous advances.

English
0
0
0
27
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@JonahDispatch Same, though not as scary as when the fembots took their faces off. I could not sleep.
English
0
0
1
8
Alex retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
The average American today lives better than John D. Rockefeller did in 1926. That is not an exaggeration. It is a fact. Rockefeller could not fly across the country in five hours. You can for $200. He could not video call his family from another continent. You do it for free. He had no antibiotics, no MRI, no air conditioning in July. He could not carry every book ever written in his pocket. You are reading this on a device that does all of that and more. Americans throw away 30-40% of their food. Not because they are wasteful, but because food is so abundant that waste is affordable. Your car has climate control, navigation, and safety systems that did not exist at any price a century ago. Your home has heating, cooling, refrigeration, and entertainment that emperors could not have imagined. None of this was voted into existence. None of it was redistributed from the rich. It was created by free minds operating in what remains of a free market. Every comfort you enjoy today is the product of a man who thought, invented, produced, and traded voluntarily. This is what the remnants of capitalism still deliver, even while it is being dismantled. Imagine what a fully free society could build.
English
356
2.4K
11.6K
420.3K
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@mungowitz I could not fail to disagree with you less.
English
0
0
0
15
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@RichardHanania @keithdorejel To say it’s an international relations book, so therefore it can’t be a public choice book is like saying it’s an international relations book, hence it can’t be using quantitative methods. You can disagree with the book, fine. You cannot disagree on the basis of genre.
English
0
0
0
303
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
@keithdorejel I published an academic book on public choice theory! You can maybe try two seconds of googling before tweeting.
English
8
1
306
12.8K
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@mungowitz A problem with your existence (and I’m not intimating there’s only one) is that it teases out guilty pleasures that, previously, one had decided to keep quietly private. And happily so. But no. First Falco. And now this. I had never intended to share. youtu.be/kHMrLpDHXc0?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
1
51
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@mungowitz Yes. We should. Here, and also in every other article or statement we ever published.
English
0
0
0
26
Alex
Alex@AlexASchue·
@mungowitz Especially since even the Oxford comma would not have saved her plight.
English
0
0
0
48