Alex

6.7K posts

Alex banner
Alex

Alex

@AlexJimenez333

Just be better.

Valencia, España Katılım Eylül 2011
261 Takip Edilen322 Takipçiler
Alex retweetledi
MisterChip (Alexis)
MisterChip (Alexis)@2010MisterChip·
‼️H I S T Ó R I C O‼️ Alacaraz y Sinner se van a enfrentar en la final de Monte Carlo, estableciendo un registro SIN PRECEDENTES en la historia del tenis masculino... ¡¡¡HAN GANADO LOS ÚLTIMOS 20 TORNEOS EN LOS QUE HAN PARTICIPADO AMBOS!!! Madrid 2024: gana Andrey Rublev y empieza la racha... 01 Roland Garros 2024: Alcaraz 02 Wimbledon 2024: Alcaraz 03 Cincinnati 2024: Sinner 04 US Open 2024: Sinner 05 Beijing 2024: Alcaraz 06 Shanghai 2024: Sinner 07 ATP Finals 2024: Sinner 08 Australia 2025: Sinner 09 Rome 2025: Alcaraz 10 Roland Garros 2025: Alcaraz 11 Wimbledon 2025: Sinner 12 Cincinnati 2025: Alcaraz 13 US Open 2025: Alcaraz 14 Paris 2025: Sinner 15 ATP Finals 2025: Sinner 16 Australian 2026: Alcaraz 17 Doha 2026: Alcaraz 18 Indian Wells 2026: Sinner 19 Miami 2026: Sinner 20 Monte Carlo 2026: Alcaraz o Sinner (final mañana) 2 años completos sin dejar ni las migajas al resto. Es una jodida locura. Lo más parecido a esto... 15 seguidos de Federer-Nadal entre marzo de 2005 y agosto de 2006 14 seguidos de Borg-McEnroe entre marzo de 1979 y junio de 1980 13 seguidos de Lendl-McEnroe entre enero de 1984 y mayo de 1985
MisterChip (Alexis) tweet media
Español
69
896
6.4K
435.8K
Alex retweetledi
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage. I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale. Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal: "If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded." I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point. Let me explain what I meant by nationalization. I meant it. I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion. The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies. I am talking about the other companies. Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract. The company that got the contract was OpenAI. OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway. Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product. I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can. The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same. The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books. Here is the thing I want you to understand. I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product. The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur. The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat. I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up. The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes. What I described is already happening.
English
2K
4.2K
20.7K
5.4M
Alex retweetledi
Danny
Danny@DjokovicFan_·
Andy Roddick: “We just witnessed greatness. To do this at 38 years old — 14 year age gap — if anyone asks Novak Djokovic about retirement they should fired.”
English
37
560
7.4K
195.8K
Alex retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Children sliding down a snowdrift as tall as an apartment building in Kamchatka, Russia, after the massive snowfalls of the past days.
English
158
1.6K
12.6K
686.6K
Alex retweetledi
The Tennis Letter
The Tennis Letter@TheTennisLetter·
Alex de Minaur. What in the name of the Tennis Gods was that. Defense out of this WORLD. 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
English
121
1.2K
16.1K
891.9K
Alex retweetledi
Ilia Topuria
Ilia Topuria@Topuriailia·
17 - 0 🌹
3.7K
25.6K
204.5K
8.9M
Alex retweetledi
Germán R. Abril
Germán R. Abril@gerebit0·
Aún sigo aquí.
Español
18
409
2.7K
140.1K
Alex retweetledi
Carlos Alcaraz
Carlos Alcaraz@carlosalcaraz·
Cómo ha ido vuestro domingo? 🥲
Carlos Alcaraz tweet media
Español
5.9K
19.4K
231.4K
4.7M
Alex retweetledi
Eurosport.es
Eurosport.es@Eurosport_ES·
🔥🇪🇸 ALCARAZ INMORTALIZA UNA 𝐎𝐁𝐑𝐀 𝐃𝐄 𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐄 AL TENIS 🧠♥️🥚🥚 @carlosalcaraz se lleva la final más larga de la historia en París para convertirse en bicampeón de #RolandGarros ante Jannik Sinner 🧡 Has vivido la épica en @Eurosport_ES y @StreamMaxES
Español
33
541
1.6K
108.2K
Alex
Alex@AlexJimenez333·
La final de 2008 tiembla.
Español
0
0
0
28
Alex retweetledi
Eurosport.es
Eurosport.es@Eurosport_ES·
👽 Es murciano y 𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒐 😳 Ahora mismo, Alcaraz todo lo que toca lo convierte en oro #RolandGarros
Español
5
34
175
14.5K
Alex retweetledi
José Morgado
José Morgado@josemorgado·
Simply THE BEST SPORT IN THE WORLD. Period.
English
139
1K
9.6K
385K
Alex retweetledi
José Morón
José Morón@jmgmoron·
Gael Monfils es un ESPECTÁCULO 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 Llega a todo.
Español
33
275
3.1K
161.4K