Aliens on ETH

@ElonMuskPD @Canbartu_eth Aliens are real

ALIENS 👽

955 days ago / Sep-15-2023 They didn’t invade. They deployed. $ALIENS is not a contract — it’s a signal. People thought they were buying a token. When the creator found the truth… he was gone. Not dead. Taken. $ALIENS is still live. If you hold it, they already know.

@PronkOnBase @Canbartu_eth

@Canbartu_eth @Aliens_OG_ETH 🤣 that tax bs ain’t going nowhere bro. Come back to the trusted contract. We sending it to 100s of millions. Only time I’ll say it to you.

Thats the oldest $ALIENS token in the world @Aliens_OG_ETH ca: 0xb725bEAC028DB65e52e4E8eC4a2036E819C95756

Have you figured out who the Alien is?

Aliens OG has landed on the ETH blockchain 👽🚀 Not just a meme — it’s a signal from another dimension. Early believers loading, community growing, and the mission is clear: take over the space. dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd2B…

@yhbryankimiq Supercycle is real

I THINK WE WILL SEE THE SUPERCYCLE IN 30 DAYS. 100%

@Aliens_OG_ETH Og ca:0xb725bEAC028DB65e52e4E8eC4a2036E819C95756

Aliens are real

@dogeofficialceo $ALIENS

dogecoin:native

@elonmusk You’ve spotted us

Grok Imagine prompt: Add some aliens

@DimaZeniuk Aliens, definitely aliens

this is the og on chain #ETH $ALIENS 0xb725beac028db65e52e4e8ec4a2036e819c95756 2023-09-15 12:48 UTC 0xc77867d630dbe567d219a86fddbe7ef1f0670fdc← you 2023-12-17 08:51 UTC+92d 20h after OG

#aliens everywhere

$ALIENS

@jessepollak AZUL

Azul.

@Paknodes @Gautamguptagg @0G_Foundation @michaelh_0g @ghcryptoguy There won't be a second checker because they are scammers

@Gautamguptagg @0G_Foundation @michaelh_0g @ghcryptoguy Come on, bro, FUDDing on 0G LABS's every post won't give you any reward; instead, wait for the season 2 checker. You can see how many things they have accomplished in a short time, and they are still working on many more, so I guess they should be given some time. Thanks

At 0G, we are deeply grateful to our 23 exchange partners who supported our launch on Day 1. Their contributions and partnership have been invaluable, and we remain committed to building long-term, win-win collaborations with our ecosystem partners. Unfortunately, we must address a serious issue with one partner — Bitget. This is not a statement we wanted to make, but after exhausting private channels and multiple attempts to resolve the situation, we feel it is our responsibility to bring transparency to the community. Web3 cannot mature into the foundation of a new financial system if it is built on broken promises. Integrity and accountability must be the standard, not the exception. What Happened -> Since July, we have been in active discussions with Bitget regarding a large, long-term staking campaign (90 days or longer). -> On September 15, both parties confirmed mutual understanding of this position. -> On September 18, we finalized the contract, which clearly outlined the staking allocation, with a structured breakdown of campaign design and APY. Bitget approved these final terms and confirmed readiness to proceed. However, despite multiple follow-ups and requests, Bitget continues to fail to fulfill the promises they made to sign. However, to date, the contract has only been signed by our director. -> On September 20, less than 48 hours before token launch, Bitget sent over a marketing document that included an airdrop — directly contradicting both the agreed-upon terms and the unsigned agreement. The 0G team immediately responded, making it clear in writing that the information was incorrect and re-sharing the detailed 90-day staking token allocation breakdown to avoid any ambiguity. -> Despite our objections, Bitget ignored our response and unilaterally launched a Launchpool and airdrop campaign using the allocated tokens, in violation of the originally agreement. What was supposed to be a 90-day staking campaign was reduced to a 3-day Launchpool — undermining the spirit and integrity of the original design. Why This Matters This is not just about one campaign — it strikes at the foundation of Web3. 1. Breach of trust: If agreements can be ignored, partnerships across the ecosystem lose their meaning. 2. Community harm: Misusing tokens for unapproved campaigns confuses and misleads users, damaging confidence. 3. Industry standards: Web3 cannot mature on broken promises. Integrity and accountability must be the baseline, not the exception. Our Response Given the seriousness of this violation, we are taking the following actions: 1. Legal action: Our counsel, Fenwick & West, has issued a legal demand letter to Bitget. 2. Industry call to action: We are asking our investors and partners — including Alliance, Orange, Hack, Delphi, Bankless, Stanford Blockchain Association, Foresight, NLH, Mirana, Dao5, Dispersion, and others — to pause sending projects to Bitget until this issue is resolved. 3. Note for ecosystem partners: Bitget has shown that agreements can be broken, and we urge projects to be vigilant in protecting their eegament and commitments. Our Requests to Bitget To restore trust and accountability, we request Bitget to: 1. Immediately cease any promotions of unapproved airdrop and launch pool campaigns using our name or tokens. 2. Buy back the entire amount of 0G tokens that were diverted to the airdrop/Launchpool campaigns and either redeploy them strictly according to the original staking agreement or provide equivalent cash value. 3. Commit to ending these practices with other projects and demonstrate adherence to future agreements. Closing We did not want to escalate this matter, but integrity and trust are non-negotiable for 0G. We hope this transparency helps the industry move forward with higher standards, and we remain committed to building Web3 on a foundation of fairness, accountability, and collaboration. Thank you for your support and understanding.