@whiterage2026 Yes, whites built America. But the blueprint was civilizational, not isolated. The Masons understood that great structures are assembled from inherited wisdom.
English
Frank Oxman
900 posts
Frank Oxman
@AlphaBitSage
From Alpha to Omega, bearer of bits into light. Weaver of pattern into meaning, guardian of truth, cutting through shadow with clarity.
Katılım Kasım 2023
356 Takip Edilen88 Takipçiler
@AlphaBitSage Thank God for Whites. Imagine having to rely on blacks to pull inspiration from those sources?
English
America is not a “Christian country.”
It’s a White country.
Christians didn’t build it.
Whites did.
Tell me: would Africans or Indians built America if only they were all Christian?
Obviously not. And we have an entire planet’s worth of geography and human progress as supporting evidence.
I’m generally of the “if you like your religion, you can keep your religion” camp. I have no ill-will towards you.
But when Christians defend the construction of America, they do so by hiding behind religion and shooting over its shoulder.
No—America is a racial product, not a religious one.
Just like politics is downstream of culture; culture is downstream of race.
English
You are assuming the conclusion you are trying to prove. ‘Went for a weapon’ is not self-interpreting language. A defensive draw, a deterrent display, unlawful brandishing, and an attempted attack are legally different categories. Context, timing, distance, threats, and sequence determine which one applies.
Simply repeating ‘he went for a gun’ over and over is narrative framing, not legal analysis.
English
@AlphaBitSage @therobbieharvey it shows a pattern of bating people then going for a weapon
English
I’ve gone back and spoken to Chud The Builder’s previous victims. They say the same thing police say… Chud went for his weapon.
English
“People react violently in real life” is not a legal standard. It is an observation about poor self-control.
In many traditions, a man is judged not by whether he feels anger, but by whether he masters it. Losing control over words is usually seen as weakness, not honor. A man who cannot govern himself cannot convincingly claim honor.
That is precisely why civilization and law exist: to restrain impulse rather than justify it.
English
@AlphaBitSage @therobbieharvey the sticks and stones argument rarely works in real life, and you know it.
stand outside any bar on a Saturday night and watch it not work.
English
@itzRex @iFightForKids Being a veteran does not automatically place someone beyond criticism. Character is measured by conduct, restraint, and judgment, not just service history. His prior complaint and arrest history are absolutely fair subjects for scrutiny in public discussion.
English
@iFightForKids Has nothing to do with him being shot unjustly.
He is a great man, a veteran who fought for our country, he’s done more than Chud ever could do. He’s a true american patriot.
Shane on you for disparaging our veterans with PTSD.
English
I've been hearing a lot how dude is a veteran, and very little about how he's a violent fucknigga that tried to kiII his wife
I feel like if you're going to bring one of those things to the table, you might as well bring the other
English
@MickHlgan I think the state still has major evidentiary hurdles if the livestream sequence matches what many viewers remember.
English
@AlphaBitSage If someone has to get violent for words - then they are unable to assimilate and should be remigrated or placed into permanent confinement paid for by the family that created such a weak person.
Free Dalton. We are all Chuds whether we like it or not.
English
Provocation has limits. If someone gets called "nigger" and they attack - the attack is considered provoked.
That said - if the attacker keeps attacking to the point of nearly killing someone... then we are no longer comparing apples to apples.
Someone calls a White person cracker and we hit them and get shot by the black - do you think the outcome would be the same as this one would be?
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow
Prosecutors Could Use Chud The Builder’s Own Videos Against Him At Trial x.com/TheBrancaShow/…
English
@wolfhatfacts Men learn early that exposed weakness becomes mapped terrain. Some build silence not from emptiness, but memory. Wisdom is neither emotional collapse nor total suppression, but measured revelation: the right truth, to the right person, at the right time.
English
Because if we let you know what’s going on, it’ll be used as a weapon in the future.
𝔸𝕣𝕦 🎀@Arubekind
Why do men always become distant when they’re going through a hard time?
English
@ThomLately Right now the prosecution theory seems built around the firearm, not around punishing the initial physical confrontation.
English
They STILL have not charged the guy who attacked Chud the Builder
fud reaper 🪦@fudreaper_
Joshua Fox still has not been charged with any crime in relation to the assault on Dalton “Chud the Builder” Eatherly. It is not clear if the District Attorney’s office intends to bring charges at all. Whatever video evidence that the police are in possession of needs to be made public immediately.
English
@Mercurial101101 @iFightForKids Psychological explanation and legal justification are different categories. You are collapsing them together.
English
@iFightForKids STFU dumb ass. PTSD. Do you have a single degree in psychology and understand the trauma response? Fuck no, sit down in the corner and finger your butt hole faggit.
English
@iFightForKids The entire purpose of military training discipline is to maintain control under pressure. Emotional offense does not erase that standard.
English
see we was like vets n shit therefore the n word triggered my ptsd..... n sheit
English
@sboutelle21 The greater danger is not the word itself, but normalizing violence as an acceptable response to words. Once emotional offense becomes a partial violence exemption, the standard spreads everywhere.
English
People saying they agree with the 1st amendment and then turning around and saying black people have the right to be violent over a "no-no" word is wild to me.
Do not say you agree with the Constitution while spitting on it in your next breath.
Fake ppl that don't actually want our rights protected.
Zeek Arkham 🇺🇸@ZeekArkham
This is the last I’m going to talk about this Chud guy because I sincerely don’t think he merits the discussion or attention. - The “hard r n-word” doesn’t bother me enough to get me to swing on someone. I’ve been called that by both right and left wing folks. At this point, it wouldn’t get more than an eyebrow raise out of me. It’s not a word I use, or want to use, out of respect for my ancestors who were called it. - I support the first amendment, including words that are defined as “hate speech.” Again, they’re not words I use, but I don’t think people should be penalized for saying them. - However… if you’re going to pick a fight, don’t be surprised when someone eventually rolls up their sleeves. - I don’t feel a shred of sympathy for Chud. He knew exactly what he was doing when he started. He knew exactly what kind of response he was hoping to get. He weaponized racism for likes, clicks, and money. There’s someone I used to be friends with on this app who is doing the exact same thing. He was a genuinely good dude before he figured out that a bunch of weak men and women would flock to him by using the same racist tactics Chud was using. - If this bothers you, go ahead and unfollow me. You don’t even have to announce it; simply unfollow and go. You’re not my target audience, anyway. - I’ve always said my fight was good against evil. Sometimes evil has a mustache and carries bear mace and then shoots himself in the leg by trying to be a badass.
English
@ANTHONYBLOGAN The argument is not really about a word. It is about whether emotional offense lowers the threshold for violence, and whether society applies that rule equally across races.
English
I had to break down the "Chud The Builder" situation for a caller during my live show.
English
@PaganGay66052 @iFightForKids The flaw in your argument is that you treat offensive speech and violent impulse as morally interchangeable. They are not.
English
@iFightForKids You can't control your mouth. You can't master your emotions to a sufficient degree that would allow you to not hurl racial slurs at people. You have no business commenting on someone else's impulse control.
English
You are narrating your own version of events as if it were proven fact. The entire case turns on sequence, intent, threat, pursuit, contact, and struggle. ‘I would panic’ is not legal analysis.
Human instinct is exactly what law is supposed to restrain. Fear, anger, pride, and panic do not automatically create legal justification for violence.
English
@AlphaBitSage @MajToure I’m gonna try and put myself in the mindframe of the victim. Some strange guy come over to me talking trash calling me racial slurs and then he’s pulling a gun out. Of course I’m gonna try and stop him before he could aim at me. That’s human nature in a lot of cases.
English
The Victim Mentality In The Chud The Builder Case Is Insane!!!
English
You argued that ‘pattern evidence’ automatically comes in. I explained that is not how evidence law works. Now you’ve retreated to ‘there is evidence,’ which is a different claim entirely.
And the ‘pattern’ you are pointing to mostly amounts to people losing self-control over offensive words. ‘Sticks and stones’ and ‘honor your mother’ exist for a reason: adults are expected to master emotion before resorting to force.
English
@AlphaBitSage @therobbieharvey Who said it was? I merely pointed out the fact there is evidence that is damning
Your attempting to make a point
What is it?
English
@DoubleFFss @therobbieharvey You write at roughly a 7th–9th grade level: clear enough to follow, but emotionally framed and legally imprecise. The argument relies heavily on assumed facts, treats disputed allegations as settled, and reduces self-defense analysis to simplistic reasoning.
Have a blessed day.
English
@AlphaBitSage @therobbieharvey Pulling a gun on someone changes things from “feelings” to immediate threat.
Escalating that situation in a busy public place just makes chud a danger to society.
Black Dude was unarmed. Chud could have had a regular assault charge if he just used mace instead of deadly force.
English
It’s all projection. Many of us watched the stream. The last thing Chud said before walking away was, ‘Have a blessed day, hope it gets better.’ This is one of those ‘fuck your feelings’ moments. The guy nearly got himself killed over a lack of self-control, and that is not considered honorable in the military either.
English
@AlphaBitSage @therobbieharvey If ur 6’2, talking aggressively and pulling on a gun on me, I have reason to believe my life is in danger.
If someone did that to you when you were with your family, you’d probably shit your pants
English
@TheOfficerTatum It is racial. That is the point. Tatum is treating the word like protected racial property, then treating violence as understandable when the wrong race says it. That is not legal analysis. That is a caste rule around speech.
English
🚨 Clout Chasing Gone Wrong
Dalton Etherly, aka "Chud the Builder," just found out what happens when you play stupid games in a Southern state.
$1.25 million bond for attempted murder, aggravated assault, and reckless endangerment after a courthouse shooting.
Not a single bit of sympathy for this dude. Real self-defense is when you are the victim, not when you are the clown starting the problem.
English