Amit

😊❤️

The Brutalist (2024), dir. Brady Corbet

@adityar_13 Omg you gonna love it. Start with Shoplifters, Monster, Nobody Knows... Every film of his are beautiful. 🥺😭

@Amit4Films Not yet

Need asian film recs gng

@_pranay_24 💀💀

@Amit4Films kyaa socha batao pls?

disk ka size increase karne ke chakkar mein disk hi clean ho gyi😭

The most destructive piece of internet lore ever created is the phrase: "If they wanted to, they would." ​It sounds empowering, but it is actually deeply narcissistic. It assumes that a person’s actions are dictated 100% by their desire for you, while completely ignoring their capacity. ​A partner can desperately want to give you the world, but if they are fighting a silent financial war, battling burnout, or dealing with a health crisis, their capacity is at zero. Measuring a stressed partner's love strictly by their ability to "perform" is a lethal mistake. "If they wanted to, they would" is the fastest way to lose a fiercely loyal partner over a temporary lack of bandwidth.

@illustrationrec Damn

The Shape Of The Water Green Book Anora Oppenheimer Parasite Nomadland CODA Everything Everywhere All At Once Moonlight One Battle after Another

@Awildmustang_ Ohh wow

this is only the beginning baby 🍒

Always in owe of beautiful idol sculptures. 🥰🙏🏻

@adityar_13 What happened?

@arafat_atreides 😂😂

icl part 1 of bahubali is still better😭 (pt 2 is still good)

I'm getting too woke!!! 😔🙏🏻

Every single movie of Robert Pattinson is an apology for twilight.

Now I truly get why some tribes in Africa eat mosquito burgers. Saale 5 minutes se 4-5 macharr kaan k pass gaane gaa rahe hai. Sone do mujhe. 😭😭

So Real 🤓

@Amit4Films Goddess

Leonardo Dicaprio is completely unrecognisable in the first image of 'WHAT HAPPENS AT NIGHT'.

Ignite and undo him????? GAAAAAAAAAAYYYY

When things are put into perspective, human existence, along with its ideologies, civilizations, cultures, and religions, feels far too insignificant when set against the immensity of the cosmic order. I asked ChatGPT to map the entire history of Earth into a 24-hour timeline, and the following was the response: "If Earth’s 4.5 billion year history were compressed into 24 hours, then at 00:00 the Earth forms, around 04:00 the first life appears, by 20:30 complex life emerges, between 22:40 and 23:40 dinosaurs dominate, at 23:59:56 humans appear, and by 23:59:59 all of recorded human history unfolds. Every religion, philosophy, opinion, and all of human progress, past and present, exists within this final fraction of a second." Human existence comes in the last second. The last second. Once you actually sit with that, something fundamental shifts from within. Religion, one of the most talked about and debated topics in human history, especially the kind that leans heavily on moral codes, starts to feel… limited, or even shallow, if I may use that word. Not necessarily wrong, but very small, and to be brutally honest, insignificant in scope. As if it were trying to frame absolute truths inside a reality we barely understand. It begins to look less like something universal and more like a human attempt to impose order and morality. On this account, I can not help but agree with what @authoramish once said(though in a different context): "You have to have supreme arrogance to say, I know what the truth is." The problematic part is not the fact that it is an attempt at understanding the entirety of the cosmos. To be honest, I do not even think that is the objective. Had that been the case, the focus would have been on every life form, from an amoeba to an ant, from a grasshopper to a lion. Why is all the emphasis on humans? This anthropocentrism is what feels too narrowed, too limited, as a philosophy and perspective. But that is a discourse for some other day. What is, however, problematic is the certainty and the conviction with which ignorance is being propagated. And this is where, I believe, science does better. It is at the very least humble enough to acknowledge its limitations and say that it might not know. And it is not just religion. The same thing starts happening across the board. Philosophies, ideologies, cultures, traditions, opinions, they all begin to feel lighter than they present themselves. Not necessarily meaningless, but not nearly as deep, absolute, or even important as we assume, not even close. What changes is the sense of proportion. We think we are central, or at least important in some lasting way. But this perspective strips that away. We are recent. We are brief. We are irrelevant. And we are insignificant. And there is nothing to suggest we are anything more than that, absolutely nothing at all. It is hard to fully explain the feeling. It is not nihilism, because things still matter in everyday life. My contention is not that nothing at all matters, of course human experience cannot be negated. Two things can be true at the same time: the insignificance of humans at a cosmic scale, as well as the lived experience of being human. The point, therefore, I am trying to make is that the seriousness attached to these constructs starts to fade. If I had to put it simply, human existence starts to feel too small to be taken as seriously as we take it. In essence, we've taken ourselves a bit too seriously, for we are far too insignificant, cosmically.

@LaptimeSolitude She is back with banger.

@Amit4Films Jennifer Lawrence is instead!