Amu M

This broer that was twerking at Madlanga Commission of Enquiry representing James Bond dished him just like that? He milked James Bond dry or he realised it’s not a winnable case? Or the broer was doing marketing, to Pepereza too much on TV in order to get more clients? Anyway I hope James Bond got his appetite back ✌️

The Border Management Authority has achieved its latest major breakthrough by intercepting a truck trying to smuggle explosives valued at R1 million into our country at Beitbridge. These particular explosives are often used in cash-in-transit heists and illegal mining. Vigilant BMA officers became suspicious and worked with SARS to use the advanced scanning technology at Beitbridge to detect a hidden compartment containing the illicit goods. The driver was arrested after attempting to flee and further SAPS investigations are underway. Day after day, we are making our country safer by restoring the rule of law at our borders! 🇿🇦

kissing is so intimate and nasty.. i love that shit

Dear God. 🧎🏿❤️🙏🏿

My biggest flex at 26🥺👌🏾

Focus ❤️

@Amu_Maponya 😂😂

🇿🇦 As citizens, we firmly believe that Adv Johnson should NOT hold the authority to charge ANY citizen of this country when she herself has breached the Code of Conduct for public servants, including participating in a recruitment process that resulted in the employment of her husband and is alleged to have provided misleading testimony under #oath .🚨 Public institutions must uphold the highest standards of #ethics , integrity and accountability. When credible #concerns are raised about the conduct of those entrusted with public power, these concerns must be addressed decisively and transparently. ⚖️ Remove Adv Johnson from #IDAC. ✍🏾 Please sign the petition: c.org/njJbG4Wwnw #Khumalo #Mkhwanazi 🇿🇦

@Amu_Maponya Yep very much so

@Bizlifestyle4 Iyabonakala though

This broer that was twerking at Madlanga Commission of Enquiry representing James Bond dished him just like that? He milked James Bond dry or he realised it’s not a winnable case? Or the broer was doing marketing, to Pepereza too much on TV in order to get more clients? Anyway I hope James Bond got his appetite back ✌️

Baby Girl claim it ❤️❤️

Anyone interested in learning psychology through X? Some knowledge to boost yours♥️

@Bizlifestyle4 He is ne?

@Amu_Maponya Lol that lawyer is a crook

We are in trouble guys, is this the new kissing? I'm soo behind 😭😭😭😭😭

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the founder of the Pakistan People’s Party and former Prime Minister, was executed in 1979 after a highly controversial legal process. In 2024, the Supreme Court of Pakistan issued an opinion stating that Bhutto did not receive a fair trial and acknowledged that the original proceedings failed to meet the requirements of due process. This is known as lawfare, the use of legal systems and institutions to damage a political opponent. In Bhutto’s time, the goal of the Pakistani military regime was his physical and political removal. In modern democracies like South Africa, the goal is often political disqualification. Because under the South African Constitution, a specific court sentence can disqualify someone from being a Member of Parliament, this gives the opponents of a politician room to use the courts to stifle him. Naturally, Julius Malema has argued that the court cases against him are intended to drain his party’s resources and distract him from political organising. This is not dissimilar to the strategy effectively deployed by Pakistan against Bhutto, keeping him tied up in various legal manoeuvres. Similarly, as Malema faces sentencing, his legal team is actively arguing that the prosecution is a “kill” attempt, which is a very similar language to Bhutto’s supporters, arguing that the law is being used to try and “behead” the leadership of the EFF. Unlike 1970s Pakistan, South Africa’s judiciary has a much stronger reputation for independence, which makes it difficult to make a case of lawfare being carried out in its chambers. However, most importantly, the risk, as with the Bhutto 2024 “mea culpa”, is that when courts are used to settle political scores, the legitimacy of the law itself takes a hit, because if the public begins to see a judge’s verdict as just another political vote, the “neutral” ground required to continue pretending you have a democracy starts to erode. In Bhutto’s case, it took 45 years for the court to admit it was wrong. In Malema’s case, the drama is still unfolding in real-time, testing whether the South African legal system can remain a neutral arbiter or if it will be swallowed by the political noise. Now, Malema’s opponents point out that he did fire the weapon and that this is a crime. Period. They say this as if it removes all doubt about it being politically motivated. But people who reason like this are deliberately and cynically missing the point because lawfare is precisely when real events are selectively prosecuted and pursued with a vigour disproportionate to how similar cases are handled. So, the question about Malema’s firearm charge case is not whether he discharged a rifle or not. The real revealing question is that of all the things that happen, why this, why now, why him? And the answer is quite clearly political. This is unfortunately an impossible case to make in a South African courtroom, which is, of course, part of the point. Just ask Jacob Zuma and Ace Magashule.

kganthe bo "I’m here for you" bakae ? kenale stress .

May the sex that you're planning to do in this weather lead to pregnancy 🙏

Good morning beautiful souls ☕️🫶🏿🫶🏿Happy new week 💖May God's grace locate us and our loved ones 😇 Have yourselves a productive day ahead ✨️ Please be kind to one another 🙏🏿 😊

If I don’t understand your tweet,you will get a retweet. If I understand it ,I’ll go the extra mile to engage your tweet. 📌📌📌

IN 2023, I will walk by faith not by sight 💝 I will rise above the challenges that once held up captive! I will discover the ME that God created me to be🌸 Learn a skill. Build intimacy with God 🙏 May 2023 be the year that I DO More , BE More... ACHIEVE More😍❤️‍🔥🔥💃💐