Amy Findlay

387 posts

Amy Findlay banner
Amy Findlay

Amy Findlay

@AmySFindlay

Katılım Şubat 2017
973 Takip Edilen100 Takipçiler
Amy Findlay
Amy Findlay@AmySFindlay·
@AdeleScalia Yikes I read that first as "boob" which is what I need...Been there, done that, hair too fine and curly.
English
1
0
1
108
Adele Scalia
Adele Scalia@AdeleScalia·
Okay who’s getting a bob this spring/summer? I’m getting the itch.
English
13
0
16
1.9K
Comfortably Smug
Comfortably Smug@ComfortablySmug·
How often do you wash/have cleaned the walls inside your house?
English
424
10
52
100.7K
Chicago Tribune
Chicago Tribune@chicagotribune·
From the Editorial Board: We worried at the outset of this war that Trump didn’t really have a plan beyond the bombs in Iran. After Wednesday night’s speech, our concern only is amplified. chicagotribune.com/2026/04/03/edi…
English
22
4
11
3.2K
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
Movie name ideas for this historic search and rescue operation?
English
210
40
455
19.1K
OSINTtechnical
OSINTtechnical@Osinttechnical·
Trump's chief of staff was "concerned aides were... telling Trump what he wanted to hear instead of what he needed to hear. " -Time The President has begun many recent mornings watching video clips compiled by military officials of battlefield successes.
OSINTtechnical tweet media
English
64
381
3K
280.6K
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
Extremely insightful post.
Gummi@gummibear737

Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot

English
18
151
1.4K
60K
Amy Findlay
Amy Findlay@AmySFindlay·
@chicagotribune Iran has been at war with and attacking the US for 47 years. Where have you been?! Trump is almost beside the point, except that he has had the moral fortitude to act.
English
0
0
9
81
Chicago Tribune
Chicago Tribune@chicagotribune·
Commentary: The United States is in the position it’s in today because Trump’s predilections on Iran have failed consistently since his first term. Every assumption he’s carried has been dead wrong on every level. chicagotribune.com/2026/03/31/col…
English
26
1
8
3.5K
Christine Flowers
Christine Flowers@flowerlady61·
Um, he’s also an anti Catholic bigot. Wow, unfollowing her 😂 Is there NO ONE worthy of listening to?
English
2
0
4
606
Scott Morefield
Scott Morefield@SKMorefield·
If we had just minded our own business regarding the Middle East over the last 75 years instead of constantly meddling, if we had never built a base, never sent an operative, never gave money, never did a single purposeful thing to cause instability or attempt to overthrow a regime we didn't like for one reason or another, if our involvement had been relegated only to friendly trading with partners willing to trade, the world would be exponentially safer than it is right now. I am a proud American and believe this country has done far more good than bad in its history, but it is an irrefutable fact that our actions in the Middle East have made things worse, not better, than they would have been in our absence.
English
383
86
583
37.5K
Dr Taylor Marshall™️
Dr Taylor Marshall™️@TaylorRMarshall·
My confirmation name is “John” after Saint John the Apostle. I chose him because he had his head on Christ’s heart at the Last Supper, and I cared for the Virgin Mary. Who is your confirmation Saint and why did you choose him or her?
English
553
57
1.1K
41.1K
Amy Findlay
Amy Findlay@AmySFindlay·
@Osint613 Kind of sounds like you're rooting for US to fail.
English
0
0
0
426
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
IRGC Aerospace Force Commander Moosavi: Today, we attacked the residence of American pilots and aircrew in Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia, with a drone and a missile, and struck a gathering of 200 people. Now, to the list of casualties and damages for Trump and Hegseth, apart from the AWACS, tankers, and fuel depots, a list of casualties and injuries to the flight crew has also been added.
Open Source Intel tweet media
English
150
79
590
153.7K
Kelsey (Wicks) Reinhardt
Kelsey (Wicks) Reinhardt@catholickelsey·
Something happened this morning in Jerusalem that I cannot let pass without comment.   On the day Christians worldwide call Palm Sunday—the opening of the most sacred week of the liturgical year—Israeli national police stopped Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.   Let me be precise about what this means. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre stands on the ground of the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. It is the most sacred site in Christendom. And the Latin Patriarch, the highest Catholic authority in the Holy Land, was turned away at its door.   Not at the head of a crowd. He was not leading a procession. He and three priests, a private delegation, were well within every restriction Israel's Home Front Command established for public gatherings.    "For the first time in centuries," the Christian Patriarchs of Jerusalem declared today in a joint statement, "the Heads of the Church were prevented from celebrating the Palm Sunday Mass at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre."   For the first time in centuries.   I believe in Israel's right to security. I believe in the legitimacy of sovereign nations to make prudential decisions about public order, especially in wartime. And I want to be very clear: the security challenges Israel faces are real, and the Christian community is not indifferent to them.   But this is precisely where a distinction must be made: one that the Christian Patriarchs themselves articulated with precision, and that even the United States Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, did not hesitate to make publicly.   Ambassador Huckabee, who is by any measure a friend of Israel, called today's decision "an unfortunate overreach" that is "difficult to understand or justify." He noted what the joint statement also made clear: the Home Front Command's own guidelines restrict gatherings to fifty people or fewer. The Patriarch's delegation numbered four.   Four people. Private. Without ceremony. Below every threshold. The Israeli government's stated explanation (that the Patriarch was barred for his own personal safety) does not hold up under scrutiny. Churches, synagogues, and mosques throughout Jerusalem have operated within the 50-person restriction without incident. The Patriarch and the Custos of the Holy Land had, by their own account, complied with every wartime restriction since the conflict began. They canceled public gatherings, banned attendance, arranged broadcasts for the hundreds of millions of faithful worldwide who look to Jerusalem this week.   What was denied today was a pastor entering a church with an agreement to livestream the Mass precisely due to the imposed restrictions, not a crowd attempting to flaunt security measures.   The joint statement, signed not by one tradition but by the full community of Christian Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in Jerusalem—representing Catholics, Greek Orthodox, Armenian, Coptic, Syriac, and Ethiopian faithful alike—called the decision "a manifestly unreasonable and grossly disproportionate measure" and "an extreme departure from basic principles of reasonableness, freedom of worship, and respect for the Status Quo."    Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, one of Israel's closest European allies, called it "an offense not only to the faithful but to any community that respects religious freedom" and summoned Israel's Ambassador to Italy. French President Emmanuel Macron condemned the action and affirmed that worship must be guaranteed in Jerusalem for all religions.   These are not Israel's critics speaking. These are Israel's friends.   I want to say something directly to the government of Israel, and I ask that it be received in the spirit it is offered, namely as honest counsel from people who genuinely want Israel to succeed and who understand what is at stake in the Christian world this week. 1/2
Kelsey (Wicks) Reinhardt tweet media
English
13
21
73
3.8K
Amy Findlay
Amy Findlay@AmySFindlay·
@SohrabAhmari Sadly, he may be worse than his predecessor, and that’s saying something.
English
0
0
0
65
Sohrab Ahmari
Sohrab Ahmari@SohrabAhmari·
"Jesus does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, ... saying: 'Even though you make many prayers, I will not ​listen: your hands are full of blood' " (quoting Isaiah). Pope Leo's sermons are quietly devastating. Et dicebat qui habet aures audiendi audiat.
Sohrab Ahmari tweet media
English
62
138
795
32.6K
Amy Findlay
Amy Findlay@AmySFindlay·
@Osint613 How is this relevant, and why in the world would you post anything he said?
English
0
0
0
12
Allie ✞
Allie ✞@allie__voss·
I’m sorry, but if you’re a girl who grew up in the United States in the early 2000s….please be serious No one told you that
Allie ✞ tweet media
English
642
965
37.6K
1M
Amy Findlay retweetledi
Guy Benson
Guy Benson@guypbenson·
No Kings.
Guy Benson tweet mediaGuy Benson tweet media
English
813
5.7K
39.7K
519.4K