Brandolorian
366 posts




BREAKING🚨👀: NICK FUENTES REFUSES to COMMENT on recent CLASH Between CLAVICULAR and CHADCHAMPION (NICK DOES NOT DEFEND @Clavicular0) 😳 follow: @CChadChampion

Even Indian actresses do not feel safe from Indians.


It’s actually crazy how subversive and fake this little queer is. Calling men faggots for wanting to get married and have kids.


Tucker attacks Nick again but has to backtrack immediately when Tyler Oliveira says Nick is right about many things


This is, obviously, strategically naive. Every coherent political movement in history has required a center of ideological gravity, whether a person, a text, or a doctrine, that people can rally behind and be measured against. When you dissolve that center in the name of inclusivity, you get a fog. You get grifters, opportunists, and ideological tourists all claiming the banner that once meant something, while pulling in contradictory directions, with no mechanism to adjudicate between them. “America First” as a phrase means nothing without its content. Nick Fuentes means something specific when he says it. If nobody owns the label, then the label owns nobody, and then it becomes a marketing slogan rather than a political commitment grounded in physical reality. Movements that refuse to define themselves get defined by their enemies or colonized by their worst representatives. This is what you represent. You and everyone else who has attempted time and time again to usurp a movement of meaning, out of jealousy, out of lust for financial or social power, or out of pure stupidity, always fail because nothing will be able to conquer something. What you are representing is nothing. Calling passionate believers in something and by extension, someone, “cultists” is the laziest possible form of political analysis. I wouldn't even call it political analysis. It says nothing about the actual arguments, the actual policy commitments, or the actual loyalty in question, and it just pathologizes intensity. By that logic, every soldier who fought under a banner he didn’t personally author was a cultist. Every Catholic who defers to Rome is a cultist. Every Marxist who appeals to Marx is a cultist. Every man who wanted Washington as King at the founding of our nation was a cultist. The word is doing zero intellectual legwork. It’s a way of feeling superior to people without engaging them with intellectual honesty.






Richard Spencer on why having a clean shave is Aryan Inner Moralization



In this clip, @BeardsonBeardly goes after some boomer-tier slop, proposes a new filter rule for who can be a Groyper, and roasts @GoUncensored (retard). Bonus cameo from me too. Come on guys, we need a fixed version of the America First United conference!











