Andreas Glöckner

@dirkuwulff @C_Laudenbach @KavithaRang Congratulations on this interesting work. Null findings are important too - and great that you publish your work at our societies @SJDM_Tweets & EADM OA journal.

🚨 New article 🚨 Can experienced-based simulations help communicate financial risks? Replicating and extending a study by @C_Laudenbach and colleagues, this article with Tomás Lejarraga and @KavithaRang concludes that the benefits of experienced-based simulations are limited. Article: doi.org/10.1017/jdm.20…

@robert_bohm @ashcherb @hb_hooman @susafiedler Very nice paper. Congratulations.

🚨 NEW PUBLICATION 🚨 in Judgment and Decision Making: "Evaluating science: A comparison of human and AI reviewers" together with @ashcherb, @hb_hooman & @susafiedler Link to #OpenAccess paper: doi.org/10.1017/jdm.20…

@lakens @ConstantinSpath @sajedeh_rasti It was great talking to you - and great idea to coordinate - let's go for a meeting in Cologne next year. I am very much looking forward to that!

@AndreasGlockner @ConstantinSpath Completely true! It as so great to meet you, and we will stay in touch! Maybe @sajedeh_rasti and myself can drop by in Cologne somewhere next year to *coordinate* our plans for research :)

@lakens reminding us that we need a more coordinated approach to science and perhaps more important: no matter how much you know about meta-science, conducting rigorous research is (and will always be) hard work #metarep2024

I am thrilled to announce that together with @susafiedler we got the funding to move theory specification in social psych forward as part of @meta_rep . We are offering a position in the project - please apply and spread the word. psychjob.eu/de/job/postdoc…

@lakens @sajedeh_rasti @meta_rep Yes, I will be there. Looking forward to talk to you in Munich.

@lakens @sajedeh_rasti Great that the issue is tackled from different groups. Let's stay in touch. That could be the next big thing. Just got funding for a project as part of @meta_rep to formally specify all classic theories of social psychology - we will use the consensus approach for a case study.

It has been very funny to see people respond to my recent argument that some research practices logically follow from a philosophy of science. Imagine how these people would feel if they read Popper, who wrote a whole book about the 'logic of scientific discovery'.

@lakens It is crucial to discuss theory of science to make our science better. Popper was important, criticisms by Kuhn, Feyerabend, Lakatos pointed out important issues too. We suggest complementing Popper by adding explicit consensus building processes journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.59…

New paper published; partially funded by @meta_rep. doi.org/10.1037/dec000… We compare the performance of probabilistic reasoning content models against a benchmark using a generic deep learning network model.

@BorsboomDenny @FrederikAust @GolinoHudson @giladfeldman We moved Judgment and Decision Making to cambridge in 2023 with the same publishing model and it worked out well so far. Only very few have to pay (if earmarked publishing funds are available).

@FrederikAust @GolinoHudson @giladfeldman Cambridge is not a for profit organization. Their mission is not to make as much money as possible, but to spread science. I cannot see through everything, but they aren’t operating on a scandalous 20-40% profit margin like Elsevier and Springer: infrastructure.sparcopen.org/landscape-anal….

Unbelievable. Prestige and reputation cost us 2 billion US$ a year. The things we could have done and achieved with this money. I can't believe we just accept this and go along with this as if this is normal. This is not normal. 😔

@kaidi_wu @jayvanbavel As long as a universal theory claims that the theory holds everywhere and you might, based on some other theory, suspect that this is wrong, it is justified to conduct such research. Just don't "repackage" it. We see e.g. huge differences in cooperation btw nations

@jayvanbavel This is rampant in cultural psychology as well: Let's test every theory on a different cultural/racial group, with the only reason being "we don't know if this works for another culture".

This is a must read for every psychologist: There is disturbing absence of theory from developmental psychology research I've noticed the same thing in social psychology Paul Bloom blames the advisors, who "apparently run labs where the only motivation for running studies that anybody discusses is to get papers accepted by conferences and published in journals" smallpotatoes.paulbloom.net/p/a-lot-of-dev…

@jayvanbavel Platt 1964 provided the classic solution in his strong inference approach: ask yourself which theory could potentially be falsified with the study before conducting it. For doing this, theories have to be well specified, for which improvements have been developed recently.

@Noah_van_Dongen Congratulations, this is extremely important work for moving the field forward. To make this easier digestable, we can also avoid the differential equations in a first step and use a set of hempel Oppenheimer propositions and derive all conclusion that follow sensu Popper.

Our paper introduces a framework for evaluating explanations in psychological science. By representing theories as formal models and capturing phenomena as statistical patterns that are observed across studies, we aim to clarify how theories explain these phenomena.

It's out in Psychological Review! In this paper, we propose a method for testing whether theories explain empirical phenomena. Thanks @BorkRiet, @AFinnemann, @JonasHaslbeck, Han, Jill, @RuitenZeven, and @DennyBorsboom for making this possible! tinyurl.com/52h6e42f

@a_romano90 @ScienceAdvances Congratulations to this important paper and great to see it out. We typically only think about ingroup favoritism in this domain - good to know that in competitive situations the opposite effect holds.

Today more than 10.000 people worldwide used our webpage lnkd.in/d32dTZF that provides personality-specific advice to handle the current situation #COVID19 - within half a day! We are amazed by this great interest and hope that this contributes to…lnkd.in/dUgc4Y7

@mbialek82 @SocialPsychBull @irsp_rips @Meta_Psy @JSPP_PsychOpen @PsychOpen @ZPID @DOAJplus @SJDM_Tweets The 2017 IF of Judgment and Decision Making is 2.5. We currently observe a substantial increase in submissions and there will be a call for Associated editors and reviewers soon. Please consider to contribute your time.

@SocialPsychBull @irsp_rips @Meta_Psy @JSPP_PsychOpen @PsychOpen @ZPID @DOAJplus @SJDM_Tweets publishes Judgment and Decision Making, that is also open access, no fees, and its If oscillates around 2

Just a reminder: we should not put a price-tag on ideas and public knowledge! Show your support to your local OA journal (accept invitation to review, read, cite, send us your ms) + @irsp_rips @Meta_Psy @JSPP_PsychOpen @Psychopen @ZPID @DOAJplus #NoAPC #OAWeek #OAWeek19

@chrisdc77 @RegReports We have made positive experiences in the last year with @RegReports as well #jdmresearch - particularly noticable was the great willingness of even most prominent reviewers to help with constructive comments. Great format, highly recommended.

The standard of Stage 1 @RegReports I've been editing (by 1st-time authors) has really climbed over the last year. Far fewer desk rejections due to vague hypotheses & methods, or poorly formed research Qs. Knowledge & expertise seem to be spreading nicely among the community

Preliminary program of the 17th Conference of the German Social Psychology Section (Fachgruppentagung Sozialpsychologie) in Cologne is online now. Registration is still possible until Aug 31, 2019. #FGSP2019 #SoCCCo conftool.org/fgsp2019/sessi…

@MoneyMindMerle @AlinaGutoreva Looking forward to #SPUDM2021 in Warwick.