Andreas de Hoop
2.9K posts

Andreas de Hoop
@AndreasdeHoop1
Pseudoniem account uit veiligheidsoverwegingen. Geen trol of dubbele agenda (just saying). Foto = fictief, ik ben veel knapper in RL (duh)
de maan Katılım Temmuz 2021
60 Takip Edilen76 Takipçiler

@alinavisooo_net We live now in 2026 AFTER .....? There's your answer
English

@AtheistPhoenix The Testimonium Flavianum by Flavius Josephus tells that Jesus was resurrected - he was NOT a worshipper of God.
The resurrection of Lazarus was one of the reasons the Jew chased Jesus to kill him.
John 5:28,29 - big resurrection will come very soon
Matthew 24 worth reading
English

So, what’s your best evidence for the resurrection?
No Bible verses now!!
That’s the claim
Where’s the evidence?
Truth Avenger@levine2001
@D_Preacher_1 For me, it has been all evidence. (I was an atheist in my youth and through college, and agnostic for several years afterwards. It was a slow evolution and learning process - both science and history today backing up what was written thousands of years ago.)
English

@TawhidTakes @Truth_matters20 The "goal" of 66, 73 or 81 books are all the same: God has a name, worship only him and not statues, there will be no hell or heaven, there will be life after death but in a restored earth with no war, illness or death. John 5:28,29.
English

Love this quote because it refutes itself.
Where in the 66 books of the Bible does it say there are 66 books? Nowhere. That canon was decided by church councils centuries after Jesus. Catholics have 73 books. Ethiopian Christians have 81. The number 66 is a Protestant invention.
So by MacArthur’s own standard, the 66-book canon isn’t from God either. Because it’s not in the 66 books.
While we’re here, the word “Trinity” isn’t in those 66 books. “Bible” isn’t in those 66 books. “Sola Scriptura” isn’t in those 66 books. Jesus never once said “I am God, worship me” in those 66 books.
You posted this thinking it was a flex. It’s an own goal.
English

@davidicke You are right about Turkey however, mountain Ararat is divided in borders. I'll give you the clue: the ark is found, but don't look in Turkey but into Armenias part of Ararat.
English

@davidicke The ark is already found a decade ago by a Dutch guy. Gerrit Aalten and his Chinese explorers were inside the ark.
Gerrit used to live in region Utrecht where I have spoken to him face to face. He raised as JW and after he returned from Ararat I spoke to him.
English

Don't be silly, mate. The Old Testament 'Noah' myth was plagiarised from much earlier flood stories that can be found around the world including Sumer in Mesopotamia. There was no 'Noah' as there was no wooden ark full of animals 'two-by-two'. A made-up story can't be sitting in Turkey.
Oliver Burdick@oliverburdick
BREAKING: Noah's Ark is literally just sitting there in Turkey and people still don't believe the Bible is true.
English

@Riya333S @samrac92 That's the problem of USA: "Everything/ everyone belongs to us."
I'm on holiday in Florida, @samrac92 asks "What multi billionaire does your country have?"
@Riya333S will say: "easy, @AndreasdeHoop1 is Miami citizen" 🤣🤣🤣
English

@JohnZuyderduyn Heel veel sterkte!!
Johannes 5:28, Openbaringen 21:4
Nederlands

@ChelsElaina I would love to find one that makes 40k USD a month. Yes yes yes
English

@D_Preacher_1 Like a big bang isn't? 🤣🤣
Have a good one, enjoy
English

@iamAtheistGirl So John, Luke and Matthew didn't know Jesus? Wow!!! Newsflash
English

christians cannot handle the truth about their own religion
i didn’t write the history
i just bothered to learn it
Atheist Girl@iamAtheistGirl
and no one who wrote the bible actually knew him
English

@LumLotus And it's okay to chalm the streets with Arabic prayers on speakers?
English

Bells are used to clear devils out.
RadioGenoa@RadioGenoa
In Dearborn, Muslims are annoyed by church bells.
English

@ChatterBox_Muse @brandilwells Fact check: church says "Jesus died on a cross"
Fact: stauros was the Greek word used for his dead. Stauros is a pole/stake, not a cross.
English

In historical-critical and academic scholarship, this image and the accompanying headline are recognized as a well-known hoax and internet urban legend that has circulated since roughly 2012.
1. Fact Check: The "1500-Year-Old" Claim
The claim that this book is 1,500 years old is factually incorrect.
The Date on the Page: In the actual manuscript (which was seized from smugglers in Turkey in 2000), the inscription at the bottom clearly says it was written in the "1500th year of our Lord" (1500 AD). Viral internet posts misinterpreted "Year 1500" to mean "1,500 years old."
The Script: Scholars who specialize in Syriac and Aramaic have pointed out that the handwriting is in Neo-Assyrian, a script that was not standardized until the mid-19th century. This suggests the book may actually be less than 200 years old.
Spelling Errors: The text contains numerous basic grammatical and spelling errors that would be unlikely for a trained monk or scribe of the ancient world.
2. The "Gospel of Barnabas" Content
The headline claims the book says Jesus was not crucified. This refers to the Gospel of Barnabas, but there is a major discrepancy:
Authenticity: Virtually all secular and biblical historians agree that the Gospel of Barnabas is a medieval forgery (likely from the 14th–16th century). It contains historical anachronisms, such as mentioning wine stored in wooden casks (which were not used in the region at the time of Jesus) and a centennial jubilee that only existed in the Middle Ages.
The Theological Agenda: The text serves as a polemic that aligns with Islamic views of Jesus (seeing him as a prophet, not the Son of God, and claiming Judas was crucified in his place). However, it also contradicts the Quran by claiming Jesus was not the Messiah.
3. The "Vatican In Awe" Claim
There is no record of the Vatican being "in awe" or "in shock" over this discovery.
Standard Procedure: The Vatican frequently requests to see rediscovered manuscripts for scholarly cataloging, which is a routine academic process rather than a sign of panic.
The Council of Nicaea Myth: The meme often claims this book was "suppressed" at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. However, even if the book were 1,500 years old, it would have been written in the 500s AD—long after the Council of Nicaea had already taken place.
English




















